Case Study: Proposing A Data Gathering Approach At TLG Solut

Case Study Proposing A Data Gathering Approach At Tlg Solutions Page

Read the TLG Solutions case and consider the following questions: 1. What is the client requesting, and what goal does the client have for this project? 2. What are the presenting problems? — What do you believe may be any underlying problems? — Which of these underlying problems is most likely? Why? 3. What data would illustrate whether these underlying problems are occurring? — Which method of data gathering would you use and why? (Consider using the method of analysis shown in Table 7.2.) 4. Write a proposal that explains what data you will gather through what means (interviews, surveys, focus groups, observations, and/or unobtrusive measures). Include any questions you might ask, observations you would undertake, and/or documents you would want to gather. 5. What are the advantages and disadvantages of your data gathering choice(s)? 6. Include a rationale and proposed timeline for your approach and any details about the data gathering method itself, including possible interview or survey questions, documents to gather, or observations you would conduct. 7. Finally, ensure that your proposal addresses any additional contracting needs you may have in your relationship with Greenfield. MIN 8 PEER review REFERENCES

Paper For Above instruction

The case study concerning TLG Solutions provides an opportunity to design a comprehensive data gathering approach aimed at understanding and improving client outcomes. The central request from the client involves identifying the core issues affecting their operations and developing actionable insights through systematic data collection. The primary goal, therefore, is to diagnose existing problems accurately and recommend effective interventions by gathering relevant, reliable data from various sources within the organization.

Presenting problems identified in the case may include operational inefficiencies, communication breakdowns, or gaps in service delivery. Underlying problems could involve inadequate process workflows, misaligned organizational goals, or insufficient staff training. Of these, a likely core issue is the misalignment of internal communication channels that hinder effective decision-making. This is because such problems often underlie many operational challenges and can be elucidated through careful data collection.

To verify whether these underlying problems are occurring, data should focus on communication patterns, workflow efficiencies, employee feedback, and client satisfaction levels. Quantitative measures like surveys can capture perceptions of communication effectiveness, while qualitative data from interviews can provide detailed insights into organizational culture and bottlenecks. Observations of meetings and workflow processes can also shed light on real-time interactions and operational hurdles.

The preferred method of data gathering would involve mixed methods, combining surveys, interviews, and direct observations, aligning with the layered analysis approach of Table 7.2. Surveys offer broad quantitative insights into employee perceptions, while interviews allow for detailed understanding and exploration of underlying issues. Observations provide contextual understanding of actual practices versus reported behaviors. This triangulation strengthens the validity of findings and ensures a comprehensive view of organizational dynamics.

The proposal will include specific instruments such as structured interview questions aimed at uncovering communication issues and workflow bottlenecks, survey questionnaires designed to quantify perceptions of organizational effectiveness, and observation checklists to document real-time interactions. Example questions for interviews might include: "Can you describe any communication barriers you experience?" and "What process do you believe could be improved to increase efficiency?" Observations would document meeting engagement and workflow bottlenecks, while document gathering might include organizational charts, process flow diagrams, and internal memos.

The advantages of this mixed-method approach include triangulation, which enhances data validity and reliability, and the depth of understanding gained from qualitative insights combined with quantitative data. Disadvantages could involve resource intensiveness, requiring more time and effort for data collection and analysis, potential respondent fatigue, and the need for skilled facilitators to conduct interviews and observations effectively.

The rationale for this approach is that combining qualitative and quantitative methods offers a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand, critical for effective diagnosis and intervention planning. The proposed timeline spans approximately eight weeks, beginning with initial planning and instrument development, followed by data collection phases, and concluding with analysis and reporting. Activity phases include designing surveys and interview guides in week 1-2, conducting data collection in weeks 3-6, and analysis and report writing in weeks 7-8.

Additional contracting considerations involve ensuring confidentiality agreements with respondents, obtaining necessary permissions for observations, and clarifying data usage and reporting expectations with Greenfield. These steps are vital for ethical compliance and fostering trust between all parties involved.

References

• Babbie, E. (2013). The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Holbrook, A., Krosnick, J. A., & Pfent, A. (2007). The Causes and Consequences of Response Rates in Surveys by The Pew Research Center's American Trends Panel. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 227–269.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications. Sage Publications.
• Vogt, W. P., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2012). When to Use What Research Design. Guilford Publications.
• Fink, A. (2013). How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. Sage Publications.
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical Research Planning and Design. Pearson.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.