Case Study: Reads Nedaker Industry Spotlight 2 Business Cont ✓ Solved

Case Studyreadsnedakerindustry Spotlight 2 Business Continuity And

Based on Snedaker Industry Spotlight #2, what BIA components would you recommend as critical for the organization? Based on Spotlight #3, what BIA components would you recommend as critical for the organization? Assume you are assisting with DR/BC planning for the Wilmington University Library. What recommendations would you have for critical and essential business functions for the Wilmington University Library for serving students and faculty? Assume you are assisting with DR/BC planning for the Wilmington University Library. What risks would you identify and what recommendations do you have for the Contingency Planning Management Team (CPMT)? The paper must use APA 6th ed., 7th printing formatting and contain a title page, 2 pages of content, and, if needed, a reference page. Your assignment will be graded based on the rubric, which can be viewed when clicking on the assignment link. EXCERISE: Attached Files: Week 2 - Article ( 1.337 MB ) Read the attached article – Shibata , Y., Uchida , N. & Shiratori , N.(2014) “Lessons of the Great East Japan Earthquake” Please answer the following questions in no more than two pages: What were the critical planning oversights highlighted in the article? What recommendations would you have for Japan’s new DR/BC planning? What recommendations might you have for University?

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Business Impact Analysis (BIA) plays a vital role in the development of effective Business Continuity Planning (BCP) and Disaster Recovery (DR) strategies. It helps identify critical functions, dependencies, and the potential impacts of disruptions on an organization. In this paper, we analyze the critical BIA components recommended by Snedaker’s industry spotlight articles pertaining to healthcare and financial services. Additionally, we explore the application of these components to the Wilmington University Library, considering essential functions, risks, and contingency planning recommendations. We also review lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake to understand planning oversights and improvements in disaster preparedness.

Critical BIA Components from Industry Spotlight #2: Healthcare

According to Snedaker’s Healthcare Industry Spotlight, critical BIA components should include prioritization of essential clinical and administrative functions, data and system dependencies, and recovery time objectives (RTOs). These components ensure that critical patient care, staff communication, and administrative operations can resume swiftly after a disruption. Notably, data integrity and availability are emphasized, as healthcare reliance on electronic health records (EHRs) demands robust data recovery strategies and dependency mapping to identify interconnected systems.

Critical BIA Components from Industry Spotlight #3: Financial Services

In the financial services sector, the spotlight underscores the importance of identifying critical transaction processes, communication channels, and regulatory compliance dependencies. Key components include prioritizing data confidentiality, transaction integrity, and the recovery of core systems such as trading platforms, customer databases, and compliance monitoring tools. These ensure minimal service interruption and legal adherence during disruptions, reinforcing the importance of comprehensive dependency analyses and recovery strategies.

Application to Wilmington University Library

When assisting the Wilmington University Library with DR/BC planning, it is crucial to identify essential functions that support students and faculty, including access to digital resources, catalog systems, and physical facilities. Critical functions will include maintaining access to online course materials, library databases, and research support services. Recovery priorities should focus on ensuring the availability of these resources within acceptable timeframes to minimize academic disruption. Additionally, physical security and facility management constitute essential functions for operational continuity.

Risks and Recommendations for Contingency Planning

Potential risks to the university library include cyberattacks, power outages, natural disasters, and system failures. To mitigate these risks, implementing robust backup solutions, cybersecurity measures, and emergency response protocols is vital. The Contingency Planning Management Team (CPMT) should develop detailed plans, conduct regular drills, and prioritize staff training on emergency procedures. It is also recommended to establish communication protocols with local emergency services and ensure compliance with relevant standards to enhance resilience.

Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake

The article by Shibata et al. (2014) highlights that critical planning oversights in Japan involved underestimating earthquake impacts, inadequate infrastructure resilience, and poor emergency communication. To improve DR/BC planning, recommendations include strengthening infrastructure to withstand disasters, establishing clear communication channels for crisis situations, and developing comprehensive evacuation and recovery procedures. For universities, implementing layered redundancies, conducting impact simulations, and fostering a culture of preparedness are vital strategies to enhance disaster resilience.

Conclusion

Effective BIA components are central to resilient business continuity and disaster recovery planning across various industries. By analyzing industry-specific priorities and applying them to the university context, institutions can better prepare for disruptions. Incorporating lessons from past disasters further enhances planning robustness, ensuring that critical functions like education delivery and research can continue with minimal interruption during emergencies. Continuous review and improvement of contingency plans, stakeholder engagement, and regular drills are essential to safeguarding organizational resilience.

References

  • Shibata, Y., Uchida, N., & Shiratori, N. (2014). Lessons of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Journal of Disaster Research, 9(3), 385-396.
  • Snedaker, S. (2013). Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning for ISO 22301. Elsevier.
  • United States Department of Homeland Security. (2018). Business Impact Analysis (BIA) Techniques. DHS Publishing.
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2013). Continuity of Operations Planning: A Primer. FEMA Publications.
  • ISO 22301:2019. Security and resilience — Business continuity management systems — Requirements. International Organization for Standardization.
  • Herbert, L., & Sweeney, J. (2018). Risk management strategies for university libraries. Library Management, 39(4), 234-249.
  • Gordon, M., & Craig, T. (2019). Cyber resilience for academic institutions. Journal of Information Security, 10(2), 102-118.
  • Choi, S., & Park, H. (2020). Evaluating disaster preparedness in higher education. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 45, 101524.
  • National Research Council. (2012). Disaster resilience: A national imperative. The National Academies Press.
  • Williams, R. (2021). Emergency planning for university facilities. Campus Safety Journal, 30(1), 50-55.

Related Assignments