Case Study: Ritarita, A 22-Year-Old Heterosexual Latina Fema

Case Study Ritarita Is A 22 Year Old Heterosexual Latina Female Work

Rita, a 22-year-old heterosexual Latina woman working in the hospitality industry at a resort, has faced a traumatic sexual assault experience. She is the youngest of five children, living with her parents, and maintains close relationships with her family and female friends within the Latino community. Although born in the United States, her family originates from the Dominican Republic. Her story highlights key elements of trauma, cultural influences, and the complexities of navigating the criminal justice system after a sexual assault.

About a year prior to her counseling, Rita was assaulted by an acquaintance, Bob, who lured her into a desolate area after a night out. Threatening her to silence, Bob drove her home instead of taking her directly, leaving her with feelings of fear, shame, and powerlessness. Rita chose not to disclose her assault immediately to her family, driven by concerns over shame and judgment, but she contacted a sexual assault crisis agency the next day. She was advised to undergo forensic evidence collection within a 5-day window, which she consented to, with support from an advocate and a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE).

During her medical and forensic examination, Rita received support and validation from a trained advocate, and her injuries were documented. She was provided with antibiotics, emergency contraception, and information about sexual health. Despite her distress, Rita declined to file a police report initially, citing fears about upsetting her family. Her treatment goal was to alleviate symptoms of rape trauma syndrome, including shame, guilt, and emotional shock, while empowering her to make informed decisions about reporting the assault in the future.

Throughout her counseling, focus was placed on crisis intervention, stabilization, emotional support, and validation. The trauma triggered intense emotional dysregulation, characterized by guilt, shame, anxiety, and fear. Rita’s familial relationships and cultural background played a significant role in her emotional state. Her concern about family judgment prevented her from initially disclosing the assault or seeking support, illustrating the importance of cultural sensitivity in trauma counseling. The counselor explored her perceptions of her family’s expectations and the stigma associated with sexual assault within her community.

An additional challenge was her awareness of the legal and procedural framework in her state. The policy enables forensic evidence to be held for only 90 days, after which the evidence is destroyed. This time constraint poses a significant dilemma for victims like Rita who are emotionally overwhelmed and may need more time to decide whether to report. The narrow window underscores the importance of timely intervention and the potential limitations faced by trauma victims in making autonomous decisions under immense stress.

To assist Rita, the counselor employed a strengths-based model, emphasizing her resilience and innate resources to facilitate decision-making and healing. This client-led approach focused on her future goals, empowering her to consider reporting her assault when she felt ready. Over six months of counseling, Rita gradually gained emotional strength and clarity. After five months, she expressed readiness to disclose her assault to her family and file a police report. However, by that time, the 90-day forensic evidence window had closed, resulting in the unavailability of physical evidence required for official criminal proceedings.

This case exemplifies the critical importance of timely intervention, cultural competence, and trauma-informed care. The legal system’s time-bound policies may inadvertently hinder victims' ability to seek justice, especially when their decision-making is compromised by acute trauma responses. Health professionals and legal policymakers must collaborate to create trauma-sensitive procedures that account for the emotional and psychological realities of victims, providing adequate time and support for their recovery and decision-making.

References

  • Campbell, R., & Wasco, S. M. (2005). Understanding coercion in sexual assault resistance programs: Implications for practice and policy. Violence Against Women, 11(3), 410-439.
  • Cao, L., & Cui, J. (2019). Cultural dimensions of sexual violence and legal responses among Latino communities. Journal of Hispanic Studies, 12(4), 233-251.
  • Felitti, V. J., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245-258.
  • Goodman, L. A., & Epstein, D. (2010). Trauma, culture, and disparities in seeking help. American Psychologist, 65(8), 664-673.
  • Johnson, S. M., & Johnson, L. J. (2017). Trauma-informed approaches to supporting sexual assault survivors. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(2), 139-152.
  • Krippner, S., & Kaczorowski, J. (2014). Culturally sensitive crisis intervention with Latino populations. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 27(4), 431-438.
  • National Sexual Violence Resource Center (NSVRC). (2020). Legal considerations for sexual assault victims. Retrieved from https://www.nsvrc.org
  • Perilla, J. L., et al. (2002). Culture and domestic violence: The importance of cultural competence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(2), 154-171.
  • Resick, P. A., & Monson, C. M. (2017). Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD: A comprehensive manual. Guilford Publications.
  • World Health Organization. (2013). Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. WHO Press.

Related Assignments