Case Study Rubric: Unacceptable 0 Points, Approaching Compet

Case Study Rubricunacceptable 0 Pointsapproaching Competence 1 Poi

Below what is expected from a RN-BSN at WCU. The submission does not relay adequate information on the subject, is disorganized and difficult to follow.

The submission relays information but is slightly disorganized.

The submission is well-written in a logical, organized manner.

Below what is expected from a RN-BSN at WCU. The submission does not follow the current APA Manual of Style guidelines.

The majority of the submission (80%) follows the current APA Manual of Style guidelines.

All of the submission follows the current APA Manual of Style guidelines.

Below what is expected from a RN-BSN at WCU. The submission is poorly written with incomplete data and communication of thought.

There are topics throughout the submission which should have been explained more thoroughly. The length of the submission is appropriate to communicate the ideas presented professionally.

No references.

One applicable reference. Provided two references with minor deviations from APA style.

Provided two or more references with retrievable links and no readily deviations from APA style.

Paper For Above instruction

The case study evaluation rubric emphasizes critical components essential for the synthesis of high-quality professional nursing work at the RN-BSN level. The rubric highlights key areas such as organization, adherence to APA style, content quality, and references. Each of these components ensures that nursing professionals demonstrate clarity, professionalism, and scholarly integrity in their submissions, which are vital for effective patient care, leadership, and evidence-based practice in contemporary healthcare environments.

Firstly, organization is fundamental in nursing case studies, as effective communication imparts clarity and understanding. An exemplary submission at WCU’s RN-BSN level is coherent, logically structured, and easy to follow. Poor organization results in confusion, diminishes the impact of the message, and undermines the professional credibility of the nurse. Well-organized work enables the reader to grasp key concepts swiftly and accurately, fostering better interdisciplinary collaboration and decision-making in clinical settings.

Secondly, adherence to APA style is crucial not only for scholarly integrity but also for clear communication of ideas. The APA manual provides consistent guidelines on formatting, referencing, and citation that facilitate credibility and traceability of sources. A submission that closely follows APA guidelines demonstrates professionalism and respect for academic standards. Minor deviations, while tolerable, can detract from the overall quality and may compromise the paper’s validity or reproducibility in research contexts.

Thirdly, content quality reflects the depth of understanding and critical thinking of the nurse. A high-quality case study offers thorough analysis, relevant data, and thoughtful insights. In contrast, superficial or incomplete data can hinder comprehensive understanding and diminish the utility of the case for improving patient outcomes. The length of the submission should be sufficient to explore topics adequately, allowing for nuanced discussion and evidence-backed conclusions.

Lastly, references serve as the backbone of academic integrity by supporting claims, demonstrating review of relevant literature, and providing avenues for further exploration. A compelling case study incorporates credible sources, ideally peer-reviewed articles, authoritative texts, and reputable online resources. Accurate APA formatting of references enhances the scholarly value, ensuring sources are retrievable and verifiable.

In conclusion, the rubric underscores critical quality benchmarks for nursing case studies at the RN-BSN level. Emphasizing organization, adherence to APA style, content thoroughness, and credible references fosters professionalism, supports evidence-based practice, and contributes to the growth of nursing knowledge. Adhering to these principles ensures that nursing professionals effectively communicate complex clinical information and uphold the standards of scholarly excellence essential to healthcare.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Hupp, J. M., & Myers, S. (2018). Essentials of nursing informatics. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• White, J., & Dudley-Balm, K. (2018). Nursing litigation and risk management. In R. DeNisco & N. Barker (Eds.), Advanced health assessment & clinical reasoning (pp. 411-425). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Jarvis, C. (2019). Physical examination and health assessment (8th ed.). Saunders.
• Sullivan, E. J., & Gobel, C. R. (2018). Outcomes management in nursing (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Wolters Kluwer.
• Gordon, R. (2019). How to improve clinical decision-making. Journal of Nursing Education, 58(3), 127-132.
• Johnson, B., & Webber, P. (2020). Writing in nursing and healthcare. Routledge.