Case Study: Schizophrenia 1

Case Study Schizophrenia 1

CASE STUDY: SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 Case study: Schizophrenia Name Institutional affiliation Date Student name: Date: Lesson: Mental health diagnosis: Schizophrenia Client’s name: Calista Signs and symptoms for mental health diagnosis: · Delusions · Suicidal thoughts · Lack of motivation · Depression phases Other case details that need to be known for treatment planning: · Whether the patient was under any form of medication prior to the diagnosis-understanding, the patient's forms of medication and therapy prior to this diagnosis will provide the medical officer with information on how the client’s body reacted to these medications and if these forms of medication lowered the occurrence of signs and symptoms. · Whether family and friends are aware of ways of dealing with her schizophrenic episodes- When family and close friends of the client are informed of the mental condition, they will better understand why these episodes occur and will calmy take measures to help her if they occur in future.

The above information will help the medical officer formulate an overall treatment plan that includes the client's family and friends. Before this diagnosis, any form of medication she was taking might affect future prescriptions. Treatment interventions and reason: · Psychiatric evaluation- psychiatric evaluation will help rule out other causes of the client’s signs and symptoms. · Antipsychotic medications- will help mitigate the signs and symptoms of schizophrenia by controlling the action of dopamine in the brain. · Psychosocial interventions- these are interventions that involve teaching people with schizophrenia how to live everyday lives as much as possible. · Electroconvulsive therapy is mainly for people who do not respond to medical therapy and may also have depression.

The above treatment interventions may be used individually or collaborated for better patient health outcomes. They need to be constantly reviewed as the patient progresses through treatment. Reviews may require that new interventions are implemented or that existing interventions be reduced according to the patient's health outcome. Plato believed that the rulers of the ideal society should be paid no more than four times the lowliest member of that society was paid. In the United States in 1980, CEO compensation was estimated to be 42 times that of average employees; by 2014 it was 303 times.

The $700 billion government bailout of 2008 rescued many major financial institutions whose leaders had steered the United States into the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. While millions of jobs, homes, and retirement savings were lost, senior executives in the financial sector were rewarded with enormous pay packages. The Economic Policy Institute reported in 2016 that the CEO-worker pay ratios of the largest 168 companies in the United States averaged 70 – 1 with some earning more than 300 times the median salaries of their employees. 1. Write a 3-4 Problem-Solution Analysis Paper.

2. In your writing, analyze executive compensation with the ethical toolkit and address the following questions in writing: o How would Milton Friedman want to compensate executives? o How would a utilitarian? o A deontological thinker? o What would be a virtue ethicist have to say about executive compensation? o What would be the response of the ethic of care? 3. 1-inch margins 4. Double-spaced 5. 12-point Times New Roman font 6. Title page with topic and your name 7. References page 8. * Make sure you cite ALL information in the text that is used from another source, paper will be checked for plagiarism upon submission Case Study Student Name: Becky Sample Date: 8/1/21 Lesson #: 29 Mental Health Diagnosis: Paranoia (use the exact diagnosis given within the case study narrative) Client’s Name: Jane Sample Signs and Symptoms for Mental Health Diagnosis: (Write all signs and symptoms listed within the case study.) • Extreme and consistent distrust of others without sufficient basis. • Verbalizes intent to harm self. • Avoids others out of fear of being hurt. • Irrational beliefs and describes visual hallucinations.

Other Case Details Need to Know for Treatment Planning (must explain reasoning): (After reading the case study, ask yourself, what else do I need to know about this client to assist them? In other words, what was not told to you within the case study that you need to know? Remember, do not use the word “I” within your Case Study document.) • Additional information about the client’s support system is needed to help educate the client’s family about the symptoms of mental illness so that they can respond calmly and firmly to the client’s psychotic behaviors. Treatment Interventions and Reason: (After reading the case study, look within the chapter for all the suggested treatment options for that type of diagnosis.

Choose the ones you would use for your client to address their specific symptoms and needs. Be sure to state the reason for using each. In other words, what will you use it to target and for what type of treatment outcome?) • Psychotherapy to explore the nature and depth of the client’s current feelings or ideas of paranoia to help reestablish and maintain reality-based orientation that is free from suspicious thoughts and beliefs. • Refer the client to a psychiatrist for medication evaluation. • Refer the client to a neurologist to rule out cognitive disorders as the cause for paranoia.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment prompts us to conduct a comprehensive problem-solution analysis focusing on executive compensation, utilizing various ethical perspectives, and explore related case studies involving mental health diagnoses for contextual understanding. The core aim is to evaluate the ethical considerations surrounding executive pay disparities, particularly within the context of the United States' corporate landscape, and to examine how different ethical theories inform responsible compensation practices. Furthermore, the case studies on schizophrenia and paranoia offer insights into mental health assessment, diagnosis, and treatment planning, illustrating the importance of holistic and ethically informed approaches in clinical settings.

Understanding executive compensation requires analyzing how diverse ethical frameworks would interpret the justification, fairness, and social implications of high CEO-to-worker pay ratios. Milton Friedman, a renowned economist and advocate of free-market principles, would argue that corporate executives should prioritize maximizing shareholder value within legal constraints — essentially, that their primary duty is to their stockholders. Friedman’s view emphasizes that executive salaries should be aligned with the goal of profit maximization, with compensation linked directly to performance metrics that benefit shareholders (Friedman, 1970). From this perspective, high CEO pay is justified if it results in increased profitability and shareholder returns, with limited concern for income inequality or employee well-being.

In contrast, a utilitarian approach would evaluate executive compensation based on overall happiness and societal welfare. Utilitarians would weigh the benefits and harms associated with large pay gaps, considering whether such disparities promote or hinder societal progress. Advocates of utilitarianism might argue that excessively inflated CEO salaries could undermine social cohesion and morale among employees, leading to decreased overall happiness (Mill, 1863). Conversely, if high executive pay incentivizes innovation and economic growth that benefits society at large, utilitarians might justify such compensation structures, provided they maximize collective well-being and minimize harm (Singer, 2011).

Deontological ethics, driven by duty and adherence to moral principles, would scrutinize executive compensation through a lens of fairness and justice. Kantian deontology emphasizes treating individuals as ends rather than means, which raises questions about whether exorbitant CEO pay treats employees and stakeholders with respect. If compensation practices exploit or undermine moral duties towards fairness, they could be deemed unethical (Kant, 1785). A deontologist might argue that the fairness of pay ratios hinges on transparency, equality, and moral duties to promote equity, regardless of outcome (Reich, 2012).

Virtue ethics focuses on character traits and moral virtues rather than rules or consequences. Virtue ethicists scrutinize whether high executive pay reflects virtues such as justice, temperance, and integrity. Excessive compensation might be criticized for promoting greed and hubris, traits contrary to virtues like humility and temperance (Aristotle, 384–322 BCE). Conversely, virtues might be served if compensation is fair, transparent, and aligned with integrity, fostering a corporate culture rooted in moral virtue.

The ethic of care emphasizes compassion and relational interdependence. From this perspective, executive compensation should consider the well-being of all stakeholders, including employees, communities, and society at large. Excessive CEO pay in contrast to average worker wages may be viewed as neglecting the moral responsibility to care for those most vulnerable in the organization and society (Held, 2006). A care ethic would advocate for more equitable compensation models that promote social cohesion and genuine concern for employee welfare.

Overall, ethical analysis reveals that views on executive pay are complex and multifaceted. While Friedman’s focus on shareholder primacy supports high compensation if profitable, utilitarians seek a balance that maximizes societal happiness. Kantian deontology underscores fairness and moral duties, virtue ethics emphasizes moral character, and care ethics advocates for relational responsiveness. These perspectives highlight the necessity of developing compensation policies grounded in diverse ethical principles to promote fairness, societal benefit, and moral integrity in corporate governance.

References

• Aristotle. (384–322 BCE). Nicomachean Ethics.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
• Held, V. (2006). The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford University Press.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism.
• Reich, R. B. (2012). Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few. Alfred A. Knopf.
• Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
• Reich, R. B. (2012). Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few. Alfred A. Knopf.
• Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations.
• Scott, W. R. (2012). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Sage Publications.