Case Value Stream Mapping Approach
Case Value Stream Mapping Approachvalue Stream Mapping Involves First
Case: Value Stream Mapping Approach Value stream mapping involves first developing a baseline map of the current situation of a company's external and/or internal operations and, then, applying lean concepts, developing a future state map that shows improved operations. Exhibit 12.14, for example, shows the current state with a production lead time of 4.5 days. This system is a batch/push system (indicated by striped arrows) resulting in long delays and inventory buildups. Exhibit 12.15 shows the future state map with a production lead time of 0.25 day. This was accomplished by moving to a continuous-flow pull system and attacking the seven wastes.
VSM uses a number of special icons and display format of boxes and flows. For a more complete discussion of the methodology, see Jared Lovelle.
Exhibit 12.14 Map of the Current State
Exhibit 12.15 Map of the Future State
Questions
1. Eliminating the queue of work dramatically quickens the time it takes a part to flow through the system. What are the disadvantages of removing those queues?
2. How do you think the machine operators would react to the change?
3. What would you do to ensure that the operators were kept busy?
Paper For Above instruction
Value stream mapping (VSM) is a critical lean tool used by organizations to visualize and analyze the flow of materials and information required to bring a product or service to completion. The primary goal of VSM is to identify waste and areas of inefficiency, enabling organizations to develop targeted strategies to improve overall process performance. This paper discusses the methodology of VSM, its advantages, potential disadvantages, and the implications of transitioning from a batch/push system to a continuous-flow pull system, while addressing the specific questions posed.
Understanding the Value Stream Mapping Process
The initial step in VSM involves creating a detailed current state map that captures the existing processes, delays, inventory levels, and information flows. This baseline provides an accurate depiction of how work currently progresses through the system. As exemplified in Exhibit 12.14, the current state map revealed a production lead time of 4.5 days, characterized by batch processing and push-based operations, which often lead to excess inventory and longer cycle times.
Once the current state is understood, organizations can develop a future state map that incorporates lean principles such as continuous flow, takt time, pull systems, and waste elimination. The future state, as shown in Exhibit 12.15, drastically reduces the lead time to 0.25 days by transitioning to a just-in-time (JIT) pull system and addressing the seven wastes—overproduction, inventory, waiting, unnecessary transportation, excess motion, overprocessing, and defects.
This methodology facilitates a structured approach to process improvement, emphasizing waste reduction and value creation from the customer’s perspective. The use of standardized icons and flow diagrams enhances clarity and communication across teams, making VSM a powerful visual management tool.
Advantages of Transitioning to a Pull System
Removing queues in a production system accelerates the flow of work, thereby reducing cycle times and inventory levels. This aligns production more closely with customer demand, minimizes waste, and increases responsiveness. However, this transition is not without challenges. One significant disadvantage of eliminating queues is that it can cause immediate disruptions if the system is not properly synchronized. For instance, the removal of buffers may lead to increased stress on machines and workers in case of variability or downtime, and may compromise the system’s ability to handle unexpected fluctuations in demand or supply interruptions.
Moreover, the immediate elimination of queues requires highly reliable processes; otherwise, it can result in frequent shortages, increased machine idling, and a risk of producing defects if quality is not maintained consistently under continuous flow conditions. Therefore, organizations must carefully balance the benefits of faster throughput against the potential risks of reduced inventory buffers.
Impact on Machine Operators
The reaction of machine operators to these changes can vary significantly depending on how the transition is managed. Some operators may experience apprehension or resistance due to fears of increased pressure, job security concerns, or unfamiliarity with new workflows. Others might welcome the change if it simplifies their tasks or aligns better with lean practices. It is crucial to involve operators early in the change process, providing clear communication, training, and support to facilitate their adaptation.
Operators accustomed to batch production may feel anxious about losing their familiar routines and buffers, which historically provided a sense of safety and reassurance. Conversely, with proper engagement and involvement, operators can become active contributors to the continuous improvement process, fostering a culture of teamwork and shared responsibility for quality and efficiency.
Strategies to Keep Operators Productive
To ensure operators remain busy and engaged during the transition, several strategies can be implemented. Firstly, comprehensive training should be offered to familiarize operators with lean principles, flow concepts, and new operational procedures. Developing a clear understanding of the benefits and their role in continuous improvement helps foster buy-in and motivation.
Secondly, cross-training operators enables flexibility in workforce deployment, allowing them to perform multiple tasks and adapt to evolving production requirements. This not only keeps them occupied but also enhances overall process resilience.
Thirdly, implementing visual management tools, such as signage and dashboards, can monitor flow and identify bottlenecks or issues in real-time, ensuring operators have continuous feedback and are engaged in problem-solving.
Lastly, involving operators in kaizen events and encouraging suggestions for process improvements can create ownership and a proactive attitude towards maintaining productivity and quality in the lean environment. These measures collectively support sustaining high levels of operator engagement and operational efficiency during the transition.
Conclusion
Value stream mapping is a vital component of lean manufacturing that provides a systematic approach to analyzing and improving processes. Transitioning from a batch/push system to a continuous-flow pull system significantly reduces lead times and inventory, supporting a more agile and customer-responsive operation. However, organizations must carefully manage the disadvantages associated with removing queues, address employee concerns, and implement strategies to keep operators engaged and productive. Through a combination of training, cross-functional teamwork, and continuous involvement, companies can successfully realize the benefits of lean transformation while maintaining a motivated and effective workforce.
References
- Rother, M., & Shook, J. (2003). Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate MUDA. Lean Enterprise Institute.
- Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer. McGraw-Hill.
- Fullerton, R. R., & Wempe, W. F. (2009). Lean manufacturing, stability, and waste reduction. Production and Operations Management, 18(3), 251-264.
- Hines, P., & Rich, N. (1997). The seven value stream mapping tools. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(1), 46-64.
- Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Simon & Schuster.
- Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 129-149.
- Kim, S., & Ogle, R. (2012). Implementing lean production: Challenges and best practices. Manufacturing Engineer, 93(1), 14-23.
- Morgan, J., & Liker, J. K. (2006). The Toyota production system: A foundation for lean transformation. Quality Progress, 39(4), 40-45.
- Rosenbaum, D. (2012). Discussing lean transformation and employee engagement. International Journal of Production Research, 50(19), 5401-5414.
- Poppendieck, M., & Poppendieck, T. (2003). Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit. Addison-Wesley.