Cases Written Must Be 250 Words. These Are Two Different Ass

Cases Written Must Be 250 Words These Are Two Different Assi

I need to cases written must be 250 words these are two different assignments must tell what happened in each case fact patterns and decisions that was made from US supreme Court and where the case was held. Name, date, and class must be in the left top corner. The title of case and citation has to be in the middle I gave an example in the attachment is need this done asap. The name of cases are Whiteley v Warden and Aguilar v Texas these are two different cases so these are two different assignments must be done the same way!

Paper For Above instruction

Cases Written Must Be 250 Words These Are Two Different Assi

Cases Written Must Be 250 Words These Are Two Different Assi

Name: [Your Name]

Date: [Date of Submission]

Whiteley v Warden, 401 U.S. 560 (1971)

Whiteley v Warden is a critical Supreme Court case dealing with issues of search and seizure, as well as the standards for granting a writ of habeas corpus. The case originated from California, where the petitioner, Whiteley, challenged his detention, asserting that his confession was obtained unlawfully. The fact pattern involved Whiteley being convicted based on evidence allegedly gathered in violation of his constitutional rights. Whiteley's defense argued that law enforcement violated his Fourth Amendment rights by conducting an illegal search. The Supreme Court examined whether the evidence presented at trial was admissible and whether the state demonstrated probable cause for the search. The Court ultimately decided in favor of the Warden, affirming that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible and that the evidence presented was sufficient to justify the detention. The decision clarified the standards for evidence admissibility and reinforced protections against illegal searches. The ruling reinforced the importance of constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and set a precedent for future cases involving evidence suppression and habeas corpus petitions. This case was held at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on June 8, 1971.

Aguilar v Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964)

Aguilar v Texas was a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the standards for issuing search warrants based on probable cause and the sufficiency of the affidavits presented to magistrates. The case arose in Texas when police obtained a warrant to search Aguilar’s residence, relying on an affidavit that lacked sufficient particularity and supporting information. The fact pattern involved Aguilar being arrested and charged with illegal possession of narcotics following a search executed under the warrant, which he contested as lacking probable cause. The defense argued that the affidavit did not establish probable cause, and thus, the evidence obtained should be suppressed. The Supreme Court reviewed whether the affidavit was sufficient under the Fourth Amendment and established a two-pronged test: the 'totality of the circumstances' and the need for the affiant to provide detailed information that justifies the warrant. The Court ruled in favor of Aguilar, emphasizing that affidavits must demonstrate a fair probability that evidence of a crime will be found in the specified location. The decision set important guidelines for law enforcement and judicial discretion concerning search warrants, reinforcing constitutional protections against unreasonable searches. This case was held in Washington, D.C., on June 15, 1964.

References

  • Case citation for Whiteley v Warden: Whiteley v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560 (1971).
  • Case citation for Aguilar v Texas: Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964).
  • Oyez. (n.d.). Whiteley v Warden. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/688
  • Oyez. (n.d.). Aguilar v. Texas. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1963/21
  • LaFave, W. R. (2015). Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment. American Casebooks.
  • Kerr, O. S. (2020). The Fourth Amendment. Harvard Law Review, 133, 270-342.
  • Loving, V. (2014). The Constitution and Search & Seizure. Oxford University Press.
  • Hall, J. (2017). Constitutional Law: Principles and Policy. Cengage Learning.
  • Schwartz, B. (2016). Police and the Fourth Amendment. Oxford University Press.
  • Statutes and Law Reports (2022). U.S. Supreme Court Reports.

Related Assignments