Ch 8 Campus Travel Date And Address Transaction Completed

Ch 8 Campustraveldateip Addresstransaction Completedtransaction Amount

Analyze the provided dataset of campus travel transactions, including dates, IP addresses, transaction completion statuses, and transaction amounts. Your task is to identify and discuss patterns related to transaction success rates based on the IP address segments, days of the week, and transaction amounts. Evaluate the potential factors influencing successful transactions and propose recommendations for improving transaction completion rates. Use data analysis methods and cite relevant scholarly sources to support your insights.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the factors that influence transaction success rates is pivotal for organizations aiming to optimize their online payment systems. The dataset provided offers a comprehensive view of campus travel transactions, including details such as the day of the week, IP addresses, transaction completion statuses, and transaction amounts. Analyzing this data reveals patterns that can inform strategies to enhance overall transaction efficiency, security, and user experience.

Preliminary inspection of the data indicates variability in success rates across different days of the week. For example, on Mondays, there is a mixed pattern with both successful and failed transactions. Specifically, successful transactions on Monday include IP addresses such as 132.154.1.0, 154.213.201.151, and 132.113.89.154, with amounts ranging from $250.00 to $420.00. Failures during the same day, indicated by "No" in transaction status, seem not to follow a clear pattern based on IP addresses alone but may be related to other factors such as network issues or user behavior.

It is noteworthy that certain IP address segments appear more frequently among successful transactions. For instance, the IP addresses starting with 156. are prevalent in successful transactions across all days, implying possibly trusted or internal network ranges. For example, 156.213.121.156 on Monday, 156.130.213.201 on Tuesday, and 156.156.48.156 on Wednesday all result in successful transactions. This pattern suggests a correlation between specific IP ranges and transaction success, potentially due to network security policies or network reliability within those ranges.

Moreover, transaction amounts vary significantly, with some high-value transactions, such as $8,000.00 on Tuesday (145.78.48.89), also succeeding. Conversely, several lower amounts like $130.00 or $180.00 also result in success, indicating that transaction value alone may not determine success or failure. Instead, factors like the user's network environment, trustworthiness of specific IP address ranges, and possibly the timing of the transaction may play critical roles.

Additionally, analyzing the day-to-day success and failure rates reveals that some days have higher success rates. Tuesday, for instance, exhibits many high-value successful transactions, suggesting increased user activity or perhaps a system optimization at that time. Wednesdays, however, show a slightly lower success rate, with numerous transactions marked as "No," especially for IP addresses from less common ranges. This indicates the possible influence of network congestion, scheduled maintenance, or security protocols that restrict certain transactions.

Another aspect worth exploring is the role of IP address segments. The dataset indicates that IPs within certain subnets are associated with successful transactions, which could be related to the network infrastructure in place at the campus. For example, IP addresses beginning with 213.56. and 156.145. are frequent among successful transactions, suggesting these networks might be more reliable or trusted. Conversely, IPs with less common segments, such as 23.89.98.132 or 48.48.189.145, have a higher incidence of failed transactions, possibly due to external or less secure networks.

Factors influencing successful transactions extend beyond network segments. Transaction amounts, timing, and user behavior also impact success rates. Larger transactions, such as the $8,000.00 payment, illustrate that even high-risk or high-value payments can be successfully processed if performed within certain network conditions or times, possibly indicating synchronized security protocols. Furthermore, days like Tuesday showcase more successful high-value transactions, potentially reflecting optimized system performance or user activity patterns.

To improve transaction success rates, institutions should consider strengthening network security and reliability, especially for external or less trusted IP address ranges. Implementing dynamic risk assessment tools, such as machine learning models that analyze IP reputation, transaction size, and timing, can further optimize transaction processing. Additionally, providing users with real-time feedback and alternative transaction channels during network issues can reduce failure rates and enhance user confidence.

In conclusion, the analysis suggests a significant correlation between IP address segments and transaction success rates, alongside the influence of temporal factors and transaction value. Recognizing and leveraging these insights can guide targeted improvements in the transaction infrastructure. Future research should incorporate more detailed network analytics and behavioral data to develop comprehensive risk mitigation strategies, ensuring higher transaction completion rates while maintaining security standards.

References

  • Böhme, R., & Moore, T. (2018). The Science of Blockchain. Journal of Cybersecurity, 4(1), 3-23.
  • Chen, L., & Zhao, X. (2020). Network Reliability and Security Analytics in Financial Transactions. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 17(2), 1072-1084.
  • Jansen, W., & Grance, T. (2011). Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud Computing. NIST Special Publication 800-144.
  • Nguyen, T. T., & Pathirana, P. N. (2021). AI-Driven Fraud Detection for Online Payment Systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(5), 1992-2004.
  • Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014). An Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting Cloud Computing Adoption. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 587-594.
  • Riley, M. & Zuo, J. (2019). Securing E-Commerce Transactions: Best Practices and Challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 186-197.
  • Shah, S. M., & Liu, C. (2018). Addressing Network Security in Campus Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(2), 1549-1572.
  • Shetty, S., & Kulkarni, S. (2020). Machine Learning Models for Fraud Detection in Transactions. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(4), 1-36.
  • Zhou, Y., & Yu, J. (2017). Big Data Analytics in Cybersecurity. IEEE Access, 5, 4767-4779.
  • Zhao, X., & Guo, Y. (2019). Enhancing Transaction Security with User Behavior Analytics. Security and Communication Networks, 2019, 1-15.

Related Assignments