Chamberlain College Of Nursing 439 Evidence-Based Pra 477266 ✓ Solved

Chamberlain College Of Nursingnr439 Evidence Based Practicenr 439 P

Identify a clinical nursing practice problem by selecting a quality or safety priority area. Justify why this problem is significant and important in nursing practice. Using the NR439 PICOT question guide, formulate a PICOT question related to the identified problem, clearly defining each PICOT element (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Timeframe). Conduct an evidence search within the Chamberlain College of Nursing library, selecting relevant, recent evidence (published within the last 10 years). Explain the relevance of the evidence to the practice problem, why it was chosen, and provide a complete APA citation with a permalink. Summarize the key findings from the evidence and justify why the nursing evidence-based practice committee should prioritize research on this problem. Additionally, identify at least four search terms and describe at least four search strategies used to narrow your evidence search.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The increasing prevalence of pressure injuries in hospitalized patients remains a significant concern within nursing practice, prompting the need for effective prevention strategies. Pressure injuries can lead to severe complications, including infections, prolonged hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Consequently, addressing this issue is imperative for enhancing patient safety and quality of care. Therefore, the clinical problem identified is the high incidence of pressure injuries among immobile adult patients in acute care settings. These patients often experience limited mobility due to underlying conditions, increasing their risk for skin breakdown and subsequent pressure injuries.

To effectively address this issue, the PICOT framework was employed to develop a focused research question. The PICOT question formulated is: Among adult immobile hospitalized patients (P), does the use of a repositioning protocol (I) compared to routine turning practices (C) reduce the incidence of pressure injuries (O) over three months (T)? This question aims to examine whether a structured repositioning strategy can effectively decrease pressure injury development compared to standard care practices in the hospital setting.

The population of interest in this study comprises adult patients admitted to acute care units who are immobile or have limited mobility. The intervention involves implementing a systematic repositioning protocol, which includes scheduled turning every two hours and skin assessments. The comparison entails routine turning practices without a formal protocol, which is the current standard in many units. The primary outcome measure is the incidence rate of new pressure injuries, which is an observable and measurable event, tracked through patient skin assessments documented in the medical records. The timeframe selected for this study is three months, sufficient to observe changes in pressure injury occurrence in response to the intervention.

In conducting an evidence search, several relevant sources were identified from the Chamberlain College of Nursing library. One key study is a randomized controlled trial by Smith et al. (2019), examining the impact of scheduled repositioning on pressure injury rates in hospitalized patients. This evidence is pertinent because it directly relates to the intervention under investigation and uses a similar patient population. The study found that patients who received repositioning every two hours experienced a significant decrease in pressure injuries compared to those with usual care. I selected this evidence because of its robust methodology, relevance, and recent publication date. The citation for this study is:

Smith, J., Lee, A., & Johnson, R. (2019). Effectiveness of repositioning protocols to prevent pressure injuries in hospitalized adults: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 34(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000321

This evidence underscores the importance of structured repositioning strategies to prevent pressure injuries and supports the intervention proposed in the PICOT question. It demonstrated that structured protocols significantly reduce pressure injury incidence, emphasizing the need for hospitals to adopt evidence-based repositioning practices.

The findings suggest that implementing a repositioning protocol could significantly improve patient outcomes by reducing pressure injuries, ultimately decreasing patient morbidity and healthcare costs. The evidence supports the argument that standard practices should evolve to incorporate more structured repositioning schedules. Consequently, the nursing practice committee should prioritize research into optimizing repositioning protocols, including frequency and assessment methods, to further refine preventive strategies and improve patient safety.

In the process of evidence searching, the following search terms were used: “pressure injuries,” “pressure ulcer prevention,” “repositioning protocol,” and “immobile adult patients.” These terms aided in retrieving relevant articles that focus on the specific variables under investigation. To narrow the search, the following strategies were employed: limiting search results to publications within the last 10 years, selecting peer-reviewed journal articles, using quotation marks for phrase searches, and applying Boolean operators (AND, OR) to combine key concepts effectively.

References

  • Smith, J., Lee, A., & Johnson, R. (2019). Effectiveness of repositioning protocols to prevent pressure injuries in hospitalized adults: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 34(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000321
  • Black, J. M., & Clarke, M. (2017). Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: Clinical practice guideline. American Journal of Nursing, 117(4), 24-31.
  • Coyer, F. M., et al. (2021). Repositioning strategies for pressure injury prevention: A systematic review. Clinical Nursing Studies, 9(2), 45-53.
  • Kozel, R., & Kramer, M. (2018). Implementing evidence-based practices in pressure ulcer prevention: Challenges and solutions. Wound Management & Prevention, 64(3), 12-20.
  • O’Neill, J., & McCarthy, S. (2020). Nurse-led interventions for pressure injury prevention in hospital settings. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(21-22), 4204-4214.
  • National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel. (2016). Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline. NPAP.

Related Assignments