Chapter 1 Of The Handbook Of Workplace Assessment

In Chapter 1 Of Thehandbook Of Workplace Assessment Author Kevin Murp

In Chapter 1 of the Handbook of Workplace Assessment, author Kevin Murphy (2010) describes two primary approaches for workplace assessment—assessing work-oriented strategies (what people do to carry out their assigned roles and responsibilities) and analyzing people-oriented factors (the characteristics of people that influence how they perform in the workplace). For each approach, describe the domains that might be assessed and what implications may be drawn by assessing each domain. Based on your understanding of the use of assessment in succession planning (as described in Chapter 15 by Paese, 2010), how might each of these approaches be used in succession planning? Explain your answer, referencing course readings and other academic sources.

Paper For Above instruction

Workplace assessment is a crucial process in optimizing organizational effectiveness by evaluating various factors that influence performance. Kevin Murphy (2010), in his seminal work, delineates two primary approaches to workplace assessment: assessing work-oriented strategies and analyzing people-oriented factors. Each approach involves distinct domains, with unique implications that can inform human resource management and organizational development, especially in critical processes such as succession planning.

Work-Oriented Strategies: Domains and Implications

The first approach, assessing work-oriented strategies, involves examining the specific tasks, behaviors, and processes that employees employ to fulfill their roles. Domains under this approach include task performance, process efficiency, decision-making practices, and adherence to organizational procedures. For instance, evaluating how employees execute their responsibilities can reveal strengths and deficiencies in operational workflows. The implications of assessing these domains are significant; they help identify high-performing practices, uncover bottlenecks or gaps in process efficiency, and inform targeted training or redesign initiatives.

Moreover, understanding work-oriented strategies allows organizations to benchmark best practices, align individual performance with organizational goals, and ensure consistency in task execution. These insights can lead to improved productivity, quality assurance, and risk mitigation. For example, if assessment reveals that certain employees consistently apply effective problem-solving strategies, this knowledge can inform succession planning by identifying potential candidates suited to leadership roles that require strategic thinking and process optimization.

People-Oriented Factors: Domains and Implications

The second approach focuses on analyzing individuals' characteristics that influence workplace performance. Domains encompass personality traits, motivation levels, emotional intelligence, learning agility, and interpersonal skills. Assessing these factors provides insight into an employee's potential for growth, resilience, adaptability, and leadership capabilities. The implications are profound; understanding these attributes enables organizations to predict future performance, cultural fit, and leadership potential.

In the context of succession planning, evaluating people-oriented factors helps in identifying high-potential individuals who possess the requisite traits for future leadership roles. For example, assessing emotional intelligence is critical, as emotionally intelligent leaders tend to manage teams effectively and foster positive organizational cultures. Furthermore, understanding an employee’s motivation and learning agility can guide development programs and targeted mentorship, ensuring that successors are not only technically competent but also possess the transformative qualities needed for strategic roles.

Application in Succession Planning

Both approaches play an integral role in succession planning efforts. Work-oriented assessments help organizations understand the specific skills and competencies necessary for future roles, aligning candidates’ current performance with role requirements. Conversely, people-oriented assessments forecast potential, highlighting individuals who exhibit the traits necessary for leadership and long-term success.

For example, assessing work behaviors can reveal technical competencies and adherence to organizational standards, while personality and motivational assessments can predict an employee’s capacity to handle increased responsibility, manage teams, and embody organizational values. Integrating both assessment approaches ensures that succession planning is comprehensive, strategic, and rooted in a deep understanding of both performance capabilities and personal attributes (Paese, 2010).

Organizations that utilize these assessments wisely can develop robust leadership pipelines, ensure continuity, and foster a culture of continuous development. This holistic evaluation process ultimately supports organizational resilience and adaptability in a competitive business environment.

References

• Murphy, K. (2010). Handbook of workplace assessment. Scott, J. C., & Reynolds, D. H. (Eds.).
• Paese, P. (2010). Succession planning and assessment strategies in organizations. In J. C. Scott & D. H. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Workplace Assessment.
• Bartram, D. (2007). The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(2), 177-191.
• Day, D. V., & Dragoni, L. (2015). Leadership development: An outcome-oriented review based on time and levels. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 409-433.
• McCall, M. W., & Hollenbeck, G. P. (2003). Developing global business leaders. Harvard Business Review, 81(10), 80-89.
• Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2019). The effect of assessment literacy on organizations' use of assessment tools. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(5), 660-674.
• Gentry, W. A., Eckert, R., Stawiski, S. A., & Campbell, S. (2016). The role of personality in predicting career success. Journal of Career Development, 43(2), 153-169.
• Sosik, J. J., & Megerian, L. E. (1999). Leadership development and personality: Effects on multiple performance outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 10(4), 487-511.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. (2005). What we know about leadership development. Journal of Management, 31(3), 329-344.