Chapter 11: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, And Transgender People C

Chapter 11 Lesbian Gay Bisexual And Transgender People Confront Het

Chapter 11 Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People Confront Heterocentrisms, heterosexism, and homophobia George A. Appleby Human behavior surrounding sexuality, intimacy, affection, and identity is complex, and this complexity has to be acknowledged when dealing with sexual orientation. Even the words that are used to describe gay, lesbian, transgender, and bisexual identity are complicated and hotly debated. Many now reject, for example, the term sexual preference, once considered correct for describing gay, lesbian, or bisexual phenomena, because it seems to reduce a core identity or master status to a matter of taste, as if one likes tacos or spring rolls. The term sexual orientation, which is the one used in this chapter, is now generally preferred because it seems to suggest something more fundamental to the person than just a casual choice among equally available alternatives.

The other term used here, sexual identity, emphasizes self-labeling, although it has both social and psychological components. However, sexual orientation can be seen as more stable than sexual identity, which may change over a person’s lifetime (Chung & Katayama, 1996). Just as gay, lesbian, and bisexual people must negotiate their social and psychological identity development in the context of a heterocentrist, homophobic, and heterosexist society, social work and other mental health professionals must develop their understanding of sexual orientation issues in a context that until recently viewed homosexuality as pathology in and of itself. It was only in 1973 that the American Psychiatric Association (APA), which sets the prevailing terms in the United States for classifying psychopathology through its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, now in its fourth edition (APA, 1994), removed homosexuality from its list of psychiatric disorders.

Thus anyone living with such identification or learning about mental health before that time had to deal with the prevailing psychiatric view of a homosexual sexual orientation as a mental illness. It is not surprising, therefore, that the remnants of that attitude are still commonly encountered in the professional context today, in professionals, in clients, in their families, and in the community (Appleby & Anastas, 1998). The view of a gay, lesbian, or bisexual orientation as a form of psychopathology was gradually replaced by the idea that being lesbian or gay is a stable and fixed positive identity. Sexual orientation refers to a characteristic of an individual that describes the people he or she is drawn to for satisfying intimate affectional and sexual needs—people of the same gender, the opposite gender, or of both genders.

We use the terms lesbian and gay in preference to homosexual to refer to men and women who are not heterosexual, or straight. In part, this is done because of the history of pathologizing attached to the term homosexual. In part, it is done because patterns of development and adaptation to a same-gender sexual orientation, like many other aspects of development, tend to differ somewhat between men and women. However, we sometimes use the term homosexual to refer to both genders together, especially to refer to specifically sexual phenomena. However, the term homosexual has been used in the past to refer only to males, so care must be taken in using the term not to render the experiences of women invisible (Garnets & Kimmel, 1993).

However, the terms gay and lesbian are often used to refer to men and women who not only engage in same-gender sexual and/or affectional activities but who also adopt, to some degree or another, what is termed a homosexual lifestyle. Some object to this concept of lifestyle, too, because it may seem to trivialize what is a life by suggesting that it has elements of fashion to it. In fact, this discussion touches on the controversy about whether there is a gay or lesbian culture in the true sense of the term and about whether open participation in that culture is necessarily desirable for lesbians, gays, and bisexuals (Lukes & Land, 1990). This issue of culture was discussed in greater depth in Chapter 2.

The term sexual identity, which is increasingly emphasized in the literature, refers to self-labeling as lesbian, gay, or bisexual (Reiter, 1989). Because sexual behavior and self-labeling are often not consistent with each other, some have differentiated the concepts by noting that “identity changes [while] orientation endures” (Reiter, 1989, p. 138). Although sexual identity is usually experienced as psychological, or internal, it is also influenced by interpersonal, social, and cultural experience (Cox & Gallois, 1996). While sexual orientation certainly involves sexuality, it is just as strongly related to affectional and social needs that are not just sexual.

Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people who are not currently sexually active retain their basic sexual orientation, just as a heterosexual person does. In fact, viewing gay, lesbian, or bisexual people as overly sexualized or compulsively sexually active is one form that homophobia can take. Based on research findings and practice experience, we now know that sexual orientation is not just about sex and sexuality; it is about sexuality, emotionality, and social functioning. The development of a sexual identity represents the integration of all of these aspects of sexual orientation into a coherent whole, an authentic sense of self, with a self-label that is subjectively meaningful and manageable. Differences in sexual orientation are based on whether a person directs his or her sexual and intimate affectional feelings and behavior toward same-gender, opposite-gender, or both same-and opposite-gender others.

Thus, some bisexual people explain their choice of love object as the result of finding specific personal qualities of the individuals they choose to relate intimately to as more important than the person’s gender (Weinberg, Williams, & Pryor, 1994; Eliason & Raheim, 1996). This conceptual definition suggests that sexual orientation should be assessed on multiple dimensions (Chung & Katayama, 1996). The definition of sexual orientation that we have so far given is primarily a psychological one; that is, it is mental, affective or emotional, and behavioral. It has nothing to do with appearance and identifiability, because there is a great diversity in how gay, lesbian, and bisexual people look, how they present themselves, and thus how identifiable they may be.

In fact, the great majority of gay, lesbian, and bisexual people are not visible or identifiable as such. Nor is any visible gay, lesbian, or bisexual community or subculture available or attractive to all gay, lesbian, and bisexual people. In fact, the formerly pejorative term queer has been adopted by some gay, lesbian, and bisexual activists to indicate a specific identification with and participation in the visible gay, lesbian, and bisexual culture and political movement that flourishes in some large cities and to distinguish a cultural and/or political commitment from sexual orientation itself. Rubin (1984) observes that acceptable sexuality should be heterosexual, marital, monogamous, reproductive, and noncommercial (pp. 280–281). It should be coupled, relational, express itself within the same generation, and occur at home. It should not involve pornography, fetish objects, sex toys, or roles other than male and female. In most cultures, gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people violate many of these rules. Transgender people are the least studied and the most discriminated against of all sexual minorities.

Cross dressing and gender blending have existed everywhere throughout human history. Despite anatomical differences between males and females, there is potential for considerable physiological and anatomical variation among individuals with the same sex organs and much overlap between the two genders. Bushong (1995) reminds us that one’s gender is on a continuum with most people at either end of the female to male scale, but a significant minority are somewhere in between. There are those whose gender does not match their physiological gender. A term used to characterize such individuals is gender dysphoria.

As is the case with same-gender sexual orientation, gender dysphoria is not pathological, but a natural aberration that exists within the population. Estimates of the number of people with gender dysphoria vary, ranging from 1% to 3% of the population. Gender norms depend strongly on the time, location, and the history of a culture (Bornstein, 1994; Wilchins, 1997). Transgender people have varying sexual orientations ranging from heterosexual to bisexual to homosexual. They also have varying degrees of discomfort with their physiological gender of birth.

Bullough, Bullough, and Elias (1997) report equal numbers of male-to-female and female-to-male transsexuals. Some transsexuals identify themselves at a very early age, well before puberty, while others emerge in their retirement years. There appears to be a surge in coming out during the mid-life years when there is a reevaluation of one’s life. Generally speaking, transgender people fall into five primary groups: 1. Cross dresser (Transvestite): people who have a desire to dress and in general appear as members of the other gender. Most crossdressers are heterosexual men. Their sexual orientation has nothing to do with their cross dressing. 2. Transgenderist: people who avoid gender role extremes and tend to be androgynous. They often incorporate both female and male aspects into their appearance. They may live part of their lives as the other gender or a blend of both. They may live entirely in the other gender role but with no plans for genital surgery. 3. Transsexual: people whose gender identity most closely matches the other sex. These individuals often feel trapped in the body of their biological gender and long to rid themselves of their primary and secondary characteristics. They yearn to live as members of the other gender, sometimes seeking medical interventions such as hormone therapy or gender-confirming surgery. 4. Non-binary or gender non-conforming individuals: those who do not exclusively identify as male or female, instead, their gender identity exists outside of the traditional binary. 5. Intersex individuals: those born with physical sex characteristics that do not fit typical definitions of male or female, often involving variations in chromosomes, gonads, or genitalia. Gender identity and expressions among transgender individuals are diverse and fluid, reflecting a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors.

The recognition and respect of diverse gender identities are critical for promoting inclusion and mental health among transgender and gender non-conforming populations. Despite the progress in understanding gender diversity, discrimination and social stigma persist, impacting the well-being and rights of transgender individuals worldwide. The societal misconception that gender identity is pathological needs to be challenged, highlighting that gender dysphoria is a natural variation rather than a disease (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Promoting awareness, acceptance, and supportive environments are essential steps toward achieving equality and improving the quality of life for all gender-diverse people.

Paper For Above instruction

The phenomenon of sexual orientation and gender identity among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) individuals has historically been misunderstood, stigmatized, and pathologized. Nevertheless, contemporary research and advocacy efforts have contributed to refining our understanding of these aspects of human identity, emphasizing their complexity and diversity. This paper explores the social, psychological, and cultural considerations surrounding LGBT identities, focusing on the concepts of sexual orientation, sexual identity, gender dysphoria, and transgender experiences while addressing the societal challenges faced by these populations.

At the core of understanding LGBT identities is grasping the distinction between sexual orientation and sexual identity. Sexual orientation refers to an enduring characteristic that describes to whom an individual is attracted—whether same-gender, opposite-gender, or both—forming an integral part of a person’s emotional and sexual functioning (Chung & Katayama, 1996). On the other hand, sexual identity involves self-labeling related to these orientations, which may or may not align with actual sexual behavior. The fluidity of sexual identity signifies that an individual’s self-perceived identity can change over time, even if their underlying orientation remains stable (Reiter, 1989). This distinction is crucial for mental health practitioners and social workers aiming to support LGBT clients effectively.

Historically, homosexuality was classified as a mental disorder by major psychiatric associations until 1973, when the American Psychiatric Association removed it from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (APA, 1994). This shift was pivotal in transforming societal attitudes, leading to greater acceptance of LGBT persons and reducing stigma. Despite this, remnants of pathogenic views persist, influencing both societal perceptions and professional practices, which necessitates ongoing education and advocacy.

The terminology used to describe non-heterosexual orientations has evolved, with terms like gay, lesbian, and bisexual becoming more prevalent and culturally sensitive than earlier terms such as homosexual, which carried pejorative connotations. The adoption of these terms not only reflects a move away from pathologizing language but also signifies an acknowledgment of diverse life experiences and cultural identities (Garnets & Kimmel, 1993). Furthermore, the concept of a “gay lifestyle” has been contested; some consider it trivializing by implying fashion or trend, while others see it as an expression of shared culture and political identity, especially in urban centers with active LGBT communities (Lukes & Land, 1990).

Gender identity explosion is another critical aspect of LGBT experiences, especially among transgender individuals who challenge the gender binary. Gender dysphoria, characterized by discomfort with one’s assigned gender, affects an estimated 1% to 3% of the population and underscores the importance of recognizing gender identity as a spectrum rather than a fixed binary (Bornstein, 1994). Transgender individuals may identify as cross-dressers, gender non-conforming, transsexuals, or intersex, each with unique pathways and needs for social acceptance and medical support. Recognizing and respecting these identities is essential for mental health and social inclusion.

Transgender individuals often face significant discrimination and social stigma, which exacerbate mental health disparities and hinder access to care. The misconception that gender dysphoria is pathological is increasingly challenged; instead, it is viewed as a natural variation of human gender development (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Supportive environments that foster acceptance and affirmation have been shown to significantly improve psychological outcomes for transgender people, emphasizing the importance of education and societal change.

In conclusion, understanding sexual orientation and gender identity in the LGBT community involves acknowledging their inherent diversity, fluidity, and cultural implications. Promoting awareness and reducing stigma are vital for fostering inclusion, improving mental health, and ensuring equitable rights. As society progresses, continued advocacy and education are indispensable for moving toward a future where all sexual and gender identities are recognized as natural variations of human diversity.

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
• Appleby, G. A., & Anastas, J. W. (1998). Social work and homosexuality: From stigma to acceptance. Social Work.
• Bornstein, K. (1994). Transgender Yonsei: A new term for gender diversity. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.
• Garnets, L., & Kimmel, D. C. (1993). Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay male development: Theoretical considerations. In L. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences.
• Lukes, J., & Land, G. (1990). LGBT Cultures and Mobilization. Social Movements and Change.
• Reiter, P. (1989). Sexual Identity and Orientation. In A. P. Smith (Ed.), The Psychology of Sexual Orientation.
• Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality.
• Wilchins, R. (1997). Read My Lips: Sexual Subversion and the End of Gender. Firebrand Books.
• Chung, T. & Katayama, K. (1996). An integrative model of sexual orientation development. Journal of Homosexuality.
• Cox, G., & Gallois, C. (1996). Culture and Sexual Identity Development. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology.