Chapter 11: Organizational Culture And Control

Chapter 11organizational Culture And Controlorganization Theory And D

Define organizational culture and identify symbols, rituals, stories, or other observable elements that signal cultural values in a company you are familiar with. Describe the four types of organizational culture. Explain the relationship between culture, corporate values, and performance. Explain how managers create a high-performance culture. Contrast a decentralized culture of control with a hierarchical culture of control. Explain the feedback control model. Describe the balanced scorecard’s value for organizational control.

Paper For Above instruction

Organizational culture is the shared set of values, norms, beliefs, and understandings that influence how members behave within an organization. This culture develops over time through shared experiences, stories, symbols, rituals, and other observable elements that communicate and reinforce core values. For instance, in a company like Google, the open office layouts, innovation awards, and collaboration rituals serve as visible symbols of their innovative and inclusive culture. These observable artifacts make the intangible aspects of culture tangible and accessible to members and outsiders alike, offering insights into organizational priorities and values.

The four primary types of organizational culture as identified by Cameron and Quinn are clan, adhocracy, market, and hierarchy cultures. Clan culture emphasizes a family-like environment, focusing on collaboration, mentorship, and shared values. Adhocracy promotes innovation, flexibility, and risk-taking, suited for dynamic and entrepreneurial organizations. Market culture is results-oriented, competitive, and emphasizes achievement and goal accomplishment. Hierarchy culture values structured procedures, stability, and control, emphasizing efficiency and consistency. Each type aligns with different organizational strategies and external environments, influencing overall performance and adaptability.

The relationship between culture, corporate values, and performance is inherently interconnected. A strong, aligned culture fosters employee commitment, engagement, and motivation, leading to higher productivity and better organizational performance. Companies such as Apple exemplify how a culture of innovation and excellence can drive business success. When corporate values are clearly articulated and consistently practiced, they serve as guiding principles that shape behavior, decision-making, and strategy execution. Conversely, misaligned or weak cultures can result in inconsistency, resistance to change, and lower organizational effectiveness.

Creating a high-performance culture requires intentional leadership and strategic initiatives. Managers can promote such a culture by defining clear values aligned with organizational goals, rewarding behaviors that exemplify desired cultural traits, and fostering open communication. For example, Netflix emphasizes a culture of freedom and responsibility, which encourages innovation and accountability among employees. Leaders also implement policies that reinforce cultural values through recognition programs, selection criteria, and development practices that support high-performance norms.

A decentralized culture of control contrasts with a hierarchical culture by decentralizing authority and empowering employees at various levels to make decisions. Decentralized control emphasizes trust, shared values, and self-control, leading to greater innovation and responsiveness. Conversely, hierarchical control relies on detailed rules, formal procedures, and top-down authority, emphasizing compliance and predictability. For example, tech startups often favor decentralized control to foster agility, while bureaucratic organizations use hierarchical control to ensure consistency and order.

The feedback control model operates through a cyclical process involving setting performance standards, measuring actual performance, comparing performance against standards, and taking corrective actions to align results with goals. It emphasizes continuous monitoring and adjustment, enabling organizations to adapt proactively. For example, in manufacturing, quality control feedback mechanisms analyze defect rates, and adjustments are made to improve product quality over time.

The balanced scorecard (BSC) provides a comprehensive management control system that balances financial and non-financial measures across four perspectives: financial performance, customer satisfaction, internal business processes, and learning and growth. By integrating these perspectives, the BSC enables managers to understand how various organizational activities contribute to overall strategic objectives. For instance, a company might measure customer retention (customer perspective), process efficiency (internal perspective), employee capabilities (learning and growth), and revenue growth (financial perspective). This holistic view facilitates better decision-making and strategic alignment.

The value of the BSC lies in its ability to connect strategic objectives with operational metrics, thereby tracking cause-and-effect relationships. Managers utilize strategy maps—visual representations linking objectives across perspectives—to identify critical success factors and prioritize initiatives. This approach aligns day-to-day activities with long-term goals, ensuring cohesive organizational efforts. For example, a strategy map might demonstrate how employee training (learning and growth) improves service quality (internal processes), leading to higher customer satisfaction, ultimately influencing financial results.

At the department level, managers utilize behavior control and outcome control to monitor performance. Behavior control involves direct supervision and observation of employees' actions to ensure processes are followed appropriately. Outcome control focuses on the results achieved, measured through specific performance metrics such as sales figures or project completion rates. Balancing these controls helps organizations foster accountability and innovation, as exemplified by sales teams monitored through quotas (outcome control) and coaching sessions (behavior control).

Organizational design should support the cultural values necessary for success. A strong, aligned culture promotes motivation, cooperation, and strategic clarity. It should reinforce the organizational structure—whether hierarchical or flat—as well as control systems like feedback models and balanced scorecards. Effective feedback mechanisms, integral to management control, involve setting strategic goals, measuring performance, comparing results to standards, and implementing corrective actions, fostering continuous improvement. For instance, regular performance reviews and real-time data analytics serve as feedback systems that enhance organizational agility and effectiveness.

In conclusion, organizational culture profoundly influences performance and strategic direction. An understanding of observable artifacts and underlying values helps leaders shape a culture conducive to high performance. Different control mechanisms, such as hierarchical and decentralized approaches, respond to varying organizational needs. Tools like the balanced scorecard and the feedback control model enable organizations to maintain alignment with strategic objectives while adapting to environmental changes. A deliberate alignment of culture, control systems, and strategy is essential for sustained organizational success, highlighting the importance of integrated management practices in contemporary organizations.

References

• Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R.. (2011). Diagnostic Culture. Competing Values Framework. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Daft, R. L. (2021). Organization Theory and Design (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75-85.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
• OECD. (2019). Culture and Local Development. OECD Publishing.
• Harzing, A. W., & Pinnington, A. H. (2011). International Human Resource Management. SAGE Publications.
• Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective. Allyn & Bacon.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business Press.