Chapter 12 Social Psychology Objectives Discuss How We Influ

Chapter 12 social Psychology objectives discuss how we influence one another

Discuss how we influence one another, including concepts such as conformity, obedience, group behavior, social thinking, attitudes, prejudice, attraction, and altruism. Explore classic experiments like Solomon Asch’s line experiment and Stanley Milgram’s shock studies to understand the factors influencing obedience and conformity. Examine how social routes—central and peripheral—affect persuasion and attitude change. Analyze how stereotypes and prejudices form and manifest behavior, focusing on ingroup and outgroup dynamics. Consider mechanisms underlying attraction, such as proximity, similarity, and attractiveness, and their impact on forming relationships. Investigate altruistic behavior, bystander effect, and the situational factors that encourage or inhibit helping behavior. Illustrate how attitudes and actions influence each other and how role-playing and social identity affect personal and group behavior.

Paper For Above instruction

Social psychology provides a comprehensive understanding of how individuals influence, and are influenced by, others within social contexts. It examines the ways in which conformity, obedience, and group dynamics shape individual behavior, attitudes, and perceptions. The foundational experiments by Solomon Asch and Stanley Milgram illuminate the powerful influence of social pressure and authority on conformity and obedience, respectively. Asch’s line experiment demonstrated how individuals often conform to group opinions, even when such opinions are clearly incorrect, driven by normative influence seeking social acceptance (Asch, 1951). Similarly, Milgram’s obedience studies revealed that ordinary people are capable of inflicting harm when ordered by an authority figure, especially under conditions that depersonalize the victim or support authority legitimacy (Milgram, 1963). These studies underscore the importance of situational factors in determining human behavior, challenging assumptions that individual morality alone governs actions.

Beyond conformity and obedience, group behavior phenomena such as social loafing, deindividuation, and group polarization significantly influence collective actions. Social loafing refers to individuals exerting less effort in group tasks, often due to perceived diffusion of responsibility (Latane, Williams, & Harkins, 1979). Conversely, deindividuation, characterized by diminished self-awareness and accountability in anonymity and arousal-filled group settings, can lead to uncharacteristic behaviors, both positive and negative (Festinger, Pepitone, & Newcomb, 1952). Understanding these processes is crucial, especially when addressing issues like mob violence or collective activism.

Social thinking, particularly attribution theory, explains how individuals interpret behaviors based on dispositional or situational factors. The fundamental attribution error describes the tendency to overemphasize personal traits and underestimate situational influences when evaluating others’ actions (Ross, 1977). This bias can exacerbate misunderstandings and prejudice, which arises from negative attitudes towards groups based on stereotypes—generalized beliefs that simplify social complexities but often lead to unfair judgments (Allport, 1954). Prejudice manifests in discriminatory behaviors that can perpetuate social inequalities, emphasizing the need for interventions targeting implicit biases.

Attitudes, comprising feelings and beliefs, influence behaviors and are shaped through persuasion and social influence mechanisms. Central route processing involves thoughtful evaluation of arguments, leading to more enduring attitude change, while peripheral route relies on superficial cues like attractiveness or credibility (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). The relationship between attitudes and actions is intricate; for instance, the facial feedback hypothesis suggests that expressing emotions can reinforce attitudes (Laird, 1974). Additionally, cognitive dissonance theory explains how conflicting behaviors and beliefs motivate attitude adjustments to reduce discomfort (Festinger, 1957).

Exploring social relations, attraction is driven by proximity, attractiveness, and similarity, contributing to forming friendships and romantic bonds (Festinger, 1950; Byrne, 1971). The mere exposure effect indicates that repeated exposure enhances liking, while the matching hypothesis suggests people tend to partner with others similar in attractiveness and social traits (Murstein, 1972). Altruism, or selfless concern for others, is influenced by situational factors like similarity, guilt, or mood, and is often facilitated by the absence of bystander intervention due to the bystander effect—where the presence of others diminishes individual responsibility (Darley & Latané, 1968). Factors that promote helping include perceived deservingness, similarity, and mood, highlighting complex interplay between personal and situational influences on prosocial behavior.

Overall, social psychology reveals that human behavior is rarely solely a product of individual personality but is profoundly shaped by social environments, group influences, and situational factors. Recognizing these influences enables better understanding and application in addressing social issues like prejudice, conformity pressures, and helping behavior, ultimately contributing to healthier, more cohesive societies.

References

• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
• Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men; into the analysis of interaction and social structure (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press.
• Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4, Pt.1), 377–383.
• Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 5, 133–156.
• Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47(2), 245–249.
• Laird, J. D. (1974). Self-attribution of emotion: The effects of expressive behavior on feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(4), 475–486.
• Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.
• Miller, A. G., & Prentice, D. A. (1999). The social psychology of stereotype and prejudice. Psychology Press.
• Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.
• Myers, D. G. (2014). Social Psychology (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
• Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). Academic Press.
• Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.