Chapter 18: Community And Group Communication Characteristic

Chapter 18community And Group Communicationcharacteristics Of Effecti

Chapter 18 focuses on community and group communication, emphasizing the key characteristics that contribute to the effectiveness of groups. It discusses the importance of collective identity, shared purpose, open communication, group norms, participation, shared leadership, cohesion, shared decision-making, conflict management, and problem-solving. The chapter explores the stages of group development, including formation, initiation, expansion, membership, and dissolution, highlighting how these stages influence group dynamics. It also delineates the roles of group members, such as gatekeeper, encourager, conflict manager, and role of goal-attainment roles like initiator, opinion seeker/giver, clarification builder, and summarizer, all essential for effective functioning.

The chapter elaborates on group functions, encompassing task-oriented roles and maintenance roles, emphasizing the importance of participation in decision-making and leadership. It identifies groups as change agents, focusing on empowerment concepts and stages of change inspired by Lewin—unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. Types of groups covered include educational, support, self-help, therapy, focus groups, and coalitions. It highlights the significance of working with groups through participatory (democratic) or authoritarian (autocratic) leadership styles, underscoring the importance of evaluating group processes, impacts, and outcomes.

Paper For Above instruction

Community and group communication are vital components of social cohesion and effective collective action. The characteristics of effective groups include shared identity, common goals, open dialogue, adherence to norms, active engagement, and balanced leadership. These elements foster an environment conducive to collaboration, innovation, and resilience, which are essential in diverse settings such as healthcare, education, and community development.

Understanding the stages of group development is critical to fostering effective teamwork. Tuckman's model delineates these stages as forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. During forming, group members become acquainted; storming involves conflict and disagreements; norming is characterized by the establishment of norms and roles; performing signifies high productivity; and adjourning involves dissolution of the group. Recognizing these phases helps facilitators manage group dynamics and enhance cohesion.

Roles within groups significantly influence their productivity and harmony. Maintenance roles, such as gatekeeper, encourager, and conflict resolver, promote cohesion, while task roles like initiator, opinion seeker, and summarizer drive progress toward goals. Effective groups balance these roles to maintain functionality. Leadership styles also impact group outcomes; participatory (democratic) leadership encourages member involvement, fostering ownership and engagement, whereas authoritarian (autocratic) leadership can hinder participation but may be necessary in urgent situations.

The concept of groups as change agents emphasizes the role of collective efforts in social transformation. Empowerment theories suggest that giving members authority and confidence enhances their capacity to initiate change. Lewin’s change model—unfreezing, changing, and refreezing—provides a framework for managing organizational or community change processes systematically.

Types of groups vary based on purpose and structure. Educational groups focus on learning; support and self-help groups facilitate emotional sharing; therapy groups address psychological issues; focus groups gather feedback; and coalitions unite different organizations for advocacy. Each type plays a distinct role in promoting social welfare and health outcomes. Leadership effectiveness within these groups often depends on fostering participation, transparency, and shared responsibility.

Group evaluation methods include process, impact, and outcome assessments. Process evaluation monitors how groups function; impact evaluation assesses immediate effects; and outcome evaluation examines long-term results. A comprehensive evaluation enables continuous improvement and accountability.

In sum, community and group communication are complex but essential for effective societal functioning. Recognizing the stages, roles, leadership styles, and evaluation strategies involved enhances the capacity of groups to accomplish their objectives and adapt to changing contexts.

References

• Agre, P. E. (2012). Communication, community, and the politics of openness. University of Illinois Press.
• Burke, R. J., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2019). The human side of organization development. Routledge.
• Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business School Press.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Pearson.
• Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R. (2012). Power and influence in groups. Routledge.
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5-41.
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall.
• Shaw, M. E. (2014). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. Routledge.
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399.