Chapter 4 – Review The Section On Linear Development In Line ✓ Solved

Chapter 4 – Review the section on Linear Development in Linear Development in Lear

Chapter 4 – Review the section on Linear Development in Learning Approaches. Discuss how learning changes over time impact organizational culture. What is the impact of this cultural change on the success of IT projects? Chapter 5 – Review the Roles of Line Management and Social Network and Information Technology sections. Note the various roles in the organization and note the similarities and differences within each role. Also, note how innovation technology management shapes how we communicate amongst coworkers within an organization.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

This paper synthesizes key themes from Chapter 4 (Linear Development in Learning Approaches) and Chapter 5 (Roles of Line Management; Social Network and Information Technology). It explains how linear learning trajectories alter organizational culture and the downstream effects on IT project success, and it compares formal line-management roles with social-network roles, concluding with how innovation technology management reshapes coworker communication. The analysis draws on organizational learning and information systems literature to connect theory with practical implications (Argyris & Schön, 1978; Senge, 1990; Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).

Chapter 4: Linear Development in Learning Approaches — Learning, Culture, and IT Project Outcomes

Understanding Linear Development in Learning

Linear development in organizational learning typically refers to stage-based, cumulative progress where capabilities build sequentially over time. This contrasts with emergent, non-linear learning where adaptation occurs through iterative feedback and dynamic reconfiguration (Senge, 1990). Linear models emphasize planned training, sequential competency acquisition, and progressively complex practices (Argyris & Schön, 1978).

How Learning Changes Over Time Impact Organizational Culture

When learning follows a linear trajectory, culture often develops stable norms, standardized routines, and predictable decision rules. Early-stage emphases (e.g., compliance, basic skills) set expectations and reward systems that persist as the organization matures into later stages (Senge, 1990). Over time, linear learning can institutionalize single-loop problem solving—fixing errors within existing norms—unless explicit processes encourage double-loop learning that questions assumptions (Argyris & Schön, 1978). Conversely, when organizations intentionally expand learning modes (from rote to reflective and then to generative learning), culture shifts toward openness, experimentation, and collective sense-making (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).

Impact of Cultural Change on IT Project Success

Cultural evolution driven by linear learning affects IT project success through several mechanisms. First, cultures that value sequential learning and standardized procedures can support predictable project governance, clear role definitions, and disciplined change control—factors associated with higher on-time, on-budget performance (DeLone & McLean, 2003). However, such cultures may resist creative problem solving and rapid pivots required for complex, high-uncertainty IT initiatives, increasing project risk (Orlikowski, 1992).

Second, progressing to higher learning stages (promoting reflection and knowledge sharing) cultivates psychological safety, cross-functional collaboration, and shared mental models, which improve requirements elicitation, stakeholder alignment, and adaptive risk management—positively affecting implementation success and user adoption (Senge, 1990; Davenport & Prusak, 1998). Empirical work suggests that knowledge-centered cultures facilitate better information flows and decision quality for IT projects (Hansen, Nohria, & Tierney, 1999).

Third, cultural change influences how organizations measure IT success. In early linear stages, technical performance and timeliness may dominate. As culture matures, success metrics broaden to include user satisfaction, business process integration, and long-term knowledge creation—dimensions central in DeLone and McLean’s updated IS success model (DeLone & McLean, 2003). Thus, linear learning that matures into reflective learning enhances the strategic contribution of IT projects.

Chapter 5: Roles of Line Management, Social Networks, and Information Technology

Roles of Line Management

Line managers occupy formal roles: allocating resources, enforcing policies, supervising staff, and translating strategy into operational tasks. They act as enablers of learning by coaching, performance feedback, and ensuring compliance with standardized processes (Argyris & Schön, 1978). Line managers are accountable for project delivery, risk mitigation, and performance evaluation—functions that align with traditional IT project governance.

Roles within Social Networks

Social networks represent informal ties that facilitate knowledge exchange, brokering, and innovation. Actors within these networks—opinion leaders, boundary spanners, knowledge brokers—enable rapid problem solving, tacit knowledge transfer, and diffusion of practices across silos (Rogers, 2003; Hansen et al., 1999). Unlike line managers, social-network roles are emergent, fluid, and depend on reputation and reciprocity rather than formal authority.

Similarities and Differences

Both line managers and social-network actors influence learning and project outcomes, but they differ in legitimacy and mechanisms. Similarities include guiding work, influencing others, and facilitating information flows. Differences include:

  • Authority vs. influence: Line managers possess formal authority; social-network actors rely on peer influence and trust (Hansen et al., 1999).
  • Stability vs. fluidity: Managerial roles are stable and defined; network roles shift according to context and expertise.
  • Control vs. emergence: Managers control resources and processes; networks enable emergent, often faster, problem-solving pathways (Rogers, 2003).

How Innovation Technology Management Shapes Coworker Communication

Innovation technology management determines which communication tools are adopted, how they are integrated into workflows, and the norms around their use. Platforms (collaboration suites, social intranets, messaging apps) create affordances that enable synchronous and asynchronous coordination, knowledge codification, and reputation-building (Leonardi, 2011). Managed well, technology flattens information hierarchies, accelerates feedback loops, and democratizes voice—supporting a culture of continuous learning and faster IT project adaptation (Orlikowski, 1992).

However, technology without cultural alignment can produce information overload, fragmentation of responsibility, and misaligned expectations about responsiveness. Successful innovation technology management therefore pairs tool deployment with training, governance, and incentives that reflect the organization’s learning stage—bridging line-management control with networked collaboration (Davenport & Prusak, 1998; Leonardi, 2011).

Practical Implications and Recommendations

1. Diagnose learning stage and align culture interventions accordingly: use assessments to determine whether the organization is in a prescriptive, procedural stage or a reflective, generative stage and tailor interventions (Senge, 1990; Argyris & Schön, 1978).

2. Integrate line-management accountability with networked knowledge flows: formalize roles for knowledge brokers and reward cross-boundary collaboration alongside performance metrics that managers track (Hansen et al., 1999).

3. Manage technology as a sociotechnical intervention: deploy collaboration tools with clear norms, training, and measures of both technical performance and user engagement to capture broad IS success dimensions (DeLone & McLean, 2003; Leonardi, 2011).

Conclusion

Linear development in learning creates cultural trajectories that shape how organizations approach IT projects. Early-stage, process-oriented cultures yield predictability but may constrain innovation; mature, reflective cultures support broader notions of success and higher adoption. Line managers and social-network actors play complementary roles: one provides formal structure, the other enables emergent knowledge flows. Effective innovation technology management aligns tools, governance, and culture so communication among coworkers supports both reliable delivery and adaptive learning, increasing the likelihood of IT project success.

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley.
  • Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding Organizational Culture. SAGE Publications.
  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
  • Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–116.
  • Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordances, constraints, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press.
  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.

Related Assignments