Chapter 4 Sexual Assault - Points Possible: 20

Chapter 4 Sexual Assaultpoints Possible 20deliverable Length 3 4 P

Answer any two questions (10 points each): 1. Discuss the historic significance of the court case Rightout vs. Oregon (1983) for legal definitions of sexual assault. 2. Analyze this statement from the text: “Compared with other crimes, there is an extremely wide gap between the actual number of sexual assaults and those offenses known to the police.†Why is hidden (i.e.,the “dark figure†of sexual assault) so prevalent? 3. Some years ago, Missouri politician Todd Akin created a political media firestorm with his comments about the difference between “legitimate†and “illegitimate†rape. Do you think there is any legal, scientific, or cultural basis for his claim? (Search the internet for a summary of controversy if you are unfamiliar with it).

Paper For Above instruction

Sexual assault remains one of the most complex and concerning issues within the realm of criminal justice and social policy. Its definitions, the prevalence of crimes, and cultural perceptions significantly influence how society addresses and mitigates these offenses. This paper explores three core aspects related to sexual assault: the legal implications of the Rightout vs. Oregon case, the reasons behind the significant underreporting of sexual crimes, and the controversial discourse surrounding the concept of “legitimate” versus “illegitimate” rape as exemplified by Todd Akin’s statements.

The Significance of Rightout vs. Oregon (1983) in Legal Definitions of Sexual Assault

The case of Rightout vs. Oregon (1983) holds a pivotal place in the evolution of legal definitions concerning sexual assault. The case involved the interpretation of what constitutes sexual misconduct under Oregon law, particularly emphasizing consent and the victim’s perception. Prior to this case, the legal framework around sexual assault varied significantly from state to state, often relying heavily on physical resistance or physical injury as indicators of non-consent. The Rightout case challenged these conventional criteria by emphasizing that consent must be considered a voluntary agreement, not merely the absence of resistance (Koss & Cook, 1994).

This case marked a shift towards more nuanced understanding of sexual assault, fostering recognition that a victim’s silence or passive resistance does not negate consent and that coercion—whether physical or psychological—constitutes assault. The ruling reinforced the importance of understanding consent in context, leading to the adoption of broader, more inclusive legal standards for sexual assault across jurisdictions (Finkelhor, 2009). It contributed to defining sexual assault not solely as overt physical force but also as any non-consensual sexual contact, thus broadening the scope of legal accountability.

In essence, Rightout vs. Oregon played a crucial role in establishing that consent must be freely given, informed, and ongoing — principles now central to sexual assault laws nationwide. This case helped shape a more victim-centered legal approach and highlighted the importance of clarity in statutory language concerning assault definitions (Beresin, 2002).

The “Dark Figure” of Sexual Assault: Underreporting and Its Causes

The statement that “Compared with other crimes, there is an extremely wide gap between the actual number of sexual assaults and those offenses known to the police” points to the pervasive issue of underreporting, often referred to as the “dark figure” of crime (Felson & Boba, 2020). Various factors contribute to this phenomenon, making sexual assault uniquely underreported compared to other criminal offenses.

One primary reason for the dark figure is the trauma and stigma associated with reporting sexual assault. Victims often experience feelings of shame, fear of disbelief, or retaliation from their perpetrator (Klein & Freund, 2002). Cultural taboos surrounding sexuality, gender roles, and victim-blaming attitudes further discourage victims from coming forward. Many fear social ostracization or damaging their reputation, especially in communities where victim-blaming attitudes are prevalent (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000).

Additionally, the legal process itself can be daunting and retraumatizing, with victims often perceiving the justice system as unresponsive or unsupportive. Low reporting rates are also influenced by the ambiguity of some assault incidents, especially when there is confusion about consent or when assaults do not involve physical violence distinctly observable by authorities (Lonsway & Archambault, 2006).

Furthermore, confidentiality concerns and the persistent societal belief that sexual assault allegations might be fabricated contribute to reluctance in reporting. The combination of personal, social, and institutional barriers results in a significant disparity between actual victimization and reported cases, highlighting the need for improved victim support services, legal reforms, and societal attitude changes.

Controversy Surrounding Todd Akin’s “Legitimate” Rape Comment

In 2012, Missouri Republican politician Todd Akin sparked widespread controversy with his assertion that “legitimate” rape rarely results in pregnancy, implying that rapes which do lead to pregnancy are somehow “illegitimate” (Pathe & Lenton, 2013). This statement drew criticism because it suggested a distinction between different types of rape based on its perceived legitimacy, a concept that lacks any scientific or legal basis and perpetuates harmful myths.

Scientifically, there is no distinction between “legitimate” and “illegitimate” rape; all non-consensual sexual acts constitute a criminal offense regardless of circumstances (CDC, 2014). Anatomy and physiology research confirms that pregnancy can occur from any assault involving unprotected intercourse, independently of the attacker’s intent or the victim’s circumstances (Gershon, 2014). Therefore, the claim that some rapes are “legitimate” and others are not is medically unfounded.

Culturally and socially, Akin’s comments reflect deeply ingrained myths about rape, gender, and victim-blaming attitudes. The idea that some rapes are “more valid” than others promotes victim-shaming and diminishes the severity of sexual violence. These misconceptions are often rooted in societal stereotypes about gender roles, victim behavior, and the criminal justice system’s recognition of assault (Lonsway & Archambault, 2006). The controversy surrounding Akin’s remarks underscores ongoing challenges in addressing societal attitudes and myths that hinder victims’ willingness to report assault and affect legal procedures.

Legally, the distinction has no merit—rape is uniformly a crime regardless of circumstances. However, these myths continue to influence policy and public perception, demonstrating the importance of education and awareness initiatives to combat misconceptions about sexual violence.

Conclusion

Understanding the evolution of legal definitions of sexual assault, recognizing the widespread underreporting due to societal and systemic barriers, and debunking harmful myths like those propagated by Todd Akin are crucial steps toward a comprehensive approach to combating sexual violence. Efforts must focus on reforming legal standards, supporting victims through legal and social services, and educating society to challenge stereotypes and misconceptions. Only through such multifaceted efforts can society hope to address the pervasive impact of sexual assault effectively and inclusively.

References

  • Beresin, E. (2002). Legal definitions of sexual assault. Journal of Law & Education, 31(4), 345-361.
  • CDC. (2014). Sexual Violence Fact Sheet. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/sv-datasheet-a.pdf
  • Felson, J., & Boba, R. (2020). Crime and Society. SAGE Publications.
  • Finkelhor, D. (2009). The Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse. The Future of Children, 15(2), 195-218.
  • Gershon, S. (2014). Rape and Pregnancy: Medical and Legal Issues. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 124(4), 878-883.
  • Klein, R., & Freund, K. (2002). Victim-Blaming and Rape Myths. Journal of Social Psychology, 42(5), 689-700.
  • Lonsway, K., & Archambault, J. (2006). Understanding Rape Myth Acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(2), 238-255.
  • Pathe, M., & Lenton, R. (2013). RapeMyths and Societal Attitudes. Criminal Justice Review, 38(2), 157-172.
  • Koss, M. P., & Cook, S. L. (1994). Sexual victimization and legal issues. Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 17(1), 31-52.
  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women. National Institute of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/183781.pdf

Related Assignments