Chapter 4: Total Combined Identify Three Different Policies

Chapter 4 1page Total Combined Identify Three Different Police Style

Identify three different police styles and compare / contrast the pros and cons of each.

Describe three generic kinds of “corporate strategies” that guide American policing.

Identify an officer degree of latitude with discretion in their struggle to adapt to the threats posed by international terrorism.

List and degree eight factors that may influence the discretionary decisions of individual officers identified in the textbook.

Paper For Above instruction

Police work is inherently complex and multifaceted, shaped by different styles, strategic paradigms, and discretionary judgments. Understanding the nuances of police styles, corporate strategies guiding policing, and the factors influencing officers' discretion provides insight into how law enforcement agencies operate within diverse societal contexts, particularly in confronting contemporary threats such as international terrorism.

Three Different Police Styles: Characteristics, Pros, and Cons

Police styles refer to the overarching approaches that law enforcement agencies adopt in their operations, reflecting different philosophies and priorities. Three prominent police styles are the Watchman, the Legalistic, and the Service styles. Each style carries distinct advantages and disadvantages, influencing community relations, crime control, and administrative functioning.

The Watchman style emphasizes maintaining public order and social cohesion through discretion and informal methods. Predominantly associated with community policing in urban areas, this style prioritizes conflict resolution and order maintenance over strict law enforcement. Its strengths involve fostering strong community relationships, reducing tensions, and enabling officers to exercise flexibility. However, the drawbacks include inconsistency in enforcement, potential neglect of statutory laws, and the risk of corruption or abuse of discretion, especially in communities with strained relationships with law enforcement.

The Legalistic style embodies a strict adherence to laws and procedures, emphasizing uniform enforcement and crime control. Agencies employing this style prioritize crime detection, arrest, and prosecution, often using a more authoritarian approach. The pro of this style is its clarity and predictability, fostering a sense of order and justice. Conversely, it can lead to community alienation, decreased officer discretion, and a lack of community engagement, which may be detrimental in building trust or handling nuanced social issues.

The Service style centers on community-oriented policing, emphasizing service to the community and problem-solving. It encourages officers to act as problem solvers and counselors rather than merely enforcers of law. The benefits of this style include improved community relations, increased public trust, and more effective intervention in social issues. However, the challenge lies in resource allocation; focusing on service may reduce emphasis on law enforcement and crime deterrence, potentially affecting overall crime rates.

Three Generic Kinds of “Corporate Strategies” in American Policing

The strategic framework guiding American policing can be broadly categorized into three generic strategies: the Crime Control Strategy, the Order Maintenance Strategy, and the Crime Prevention Strategy. These strategies reflect differing priorities and operational focuses within departments.

The Crime Control Strategy aims primarily at reducing crime through proactive policing, arrests, and enforcement. Emphasizing deterrence, this strategy favors aggressive patrols, surveillance, and rapid response units. Its strength lies in its direct impact on crime rates, but it can sometimes lead to over-policing, civil liberties infringements, and community hostility.

The Order Maintenance Strategy focuses on maintaining social order and addressing minor infractions that may disrupt community cohesion, such as public intoxication or disorderly conduct. It promotes community harmony and often involves proactive patrols. While effective in curbing public disturbances, critics argue it may foster confrontations and overreach in enforcement, especially against marginalized groups.

The Crime Prevention Strategy emphasizes long-term solutions, including community engagement, social services, and environmental design. This approach aims to reduce opportunities for crime, emphasizing partnership with community organizations. Though potentially more sustainable and less confrontational, it requires significant investment, coordination, and time to see tangible results.

Officer Discretion and Struggle to Adapt to International Terrorism

Officers operate within a significant degree of discretion, which allows flexibility given the unpredictable nature of threats such as international terrorism. Discretion permits officers to assess situations, prioritize resources, and decide on appropriate responses. However, adapting to terrorism necessitates a delicate balance; officers must be vigilant without infringing on civil liberties or creating paranoia. Enhanced training and clear protocols help officers exercise discretion responsibly in counter-terrorism efforts, although the stakes are high given potential security implications.

Factors Influencing Discretion of Police Officers

Several factors influence how officers exercise discretion in their daily duties. These include:

1. Legal constraints: Laws and departmental policies set boundaries for discretion.
2. Department culture: An agency’s norms and values shape officer behavior.
3. Situational factors: The specifics of each incident—such as severity, location, or presence of witnesses—impact decisions.
4. Officer training: Knowledge and preparedness influence judgment calls.
5. Community expectations: Society’s attitudes towards enforcement impact officer discretion.
6. Peer influence: Colleagues’ opinions and behaviors can sway decision-making.
7. Personal morals and ethics: An officer’s individual values guide actions.
8. Resource availability: Limited resources may restrict or expand discretionary options.

These factors demonstrate the complexity behind seemingly simple policing decisions, affecting outcomes and community perceptions.

Conclusion

Understanding police styles, strategies, and factors influencing discretion is essential for appreciating the challenges faced by law enforcement in contemporary society. While styles like watchman, legalistic, and service reflect different operational philosophies, effective policing requires a balanced integration of strategic approaches and responsible exercise of discretion. As threats such as international terrorism evolve, officers’ capacity to adapt while respecting civil rights remains critical. Ongoing training, clear policies, and community engagement are vital to fostering effective, fair, and adaptive policing systems capable of responding to emerging global threats.

References

• Kelling, G. L., & Moore, M. H. (1988). The evolving strategy of policing. Perspectives on Policing, 3, 1-20.
• Skolnick, J. H., & Bayley, D. H. (1988). Community Policing: Issues and Practices. National Institute of Justice.
• Lersch, K. M., & Mieczkowski, T. (2005). Discretion and the police: Balancing citizen rights and officer responsibilities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 70-90.
• Walker, S., & Katz, C. M. (2011). The Police in America. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. (2010). Policing problem places: Crime hotspots and effective crime prevention. Oxford University Press.
• Miller, L. S., & Hess, K. M. (2005). Community problem solving: Strategies and practices. Pearson Learning Solutions.
• Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. McGraw-Hill.
• Brunson, R. K., & Miller, J. (2006). Social disorganization and confidence in the police: The effects of local patrol and neighborhood organization. Justice Quarterly, 23(4), 589-617.
• Pogrebin, M. R., & Poole, E. (1998). Policing and the prevention of terrorism. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 26(3), 183-195.
• Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder, and fear. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9).