Chapter 46 Lv2-3: On December 29, 2014, An Employee Received

Chapter 46lo2 3 On December 29 2014 An Employee Received A 500

Analyze the timing of income recognition for cash basis employers and individuals based on receipt and deposit dates, considering specific transactions such as employee and employer payments, bank deposits, and when the income is considered realized for tax purposes.

Compare investment options (corporate bonds, Series EE bonds, and land) to determine which yields a higher after-tax return over five years, considering tax brackets, interest compounding, and capital gains treatment.

Determine the tax implications for Troy and the employer regarding income from checks received and deposited, considering whether the employer is cash or accrual basis, including the timing of income recognition relative to deposit dates and instructions to hold checks.

Calculate each partner’s gross income from the partnership considering initial capital, profits, withdrawals, contributions, and premium deductions, including the tax treatment of group term life insurance premiums.

Assess which financing option (bank loan with guarantee or lending from a CD) maximizes after-tax wealth for Roy and his father, considering interest rates, tax brackets, and the deductibility of mortgage interest.

Determine the additional salary Wilbur needs from a second employer to match the financial benefit of health insurance offered by a first employer, given marginal tax brackets and the value of health coverage.

Explain how the tax benefit rule applies to Dolly’s and Molly’s refunds from prior-year itemized deductions, considering their filing status and deduction choices for current year.

Evaluate the effect of scholarship funding and timing of expenditures on Adrian’s gross income for 2014 and 2015, based on the timing of scholarships received and educational expenses paid, including tuition, housing, and supplies.

Discuss the cost considerations under different employer medical plans (medical reimbursement plan vs. flexible benefits plan) focusing on partial deductibles and the economic factors influencing plan choice.

Analyze tax consequences for Fran retiring mortgages on her residence and business property using life insurance proceeds, considering mortgage interest deductions, the impact of mortgage satisfaction, and which alternative maximizes tax benefits.

Paper For Above instruction

The responses to these varied tax scenarios require an understanding of fundamental tax principles, including income recognition, the timing of transactions, investment income taxation, partnership income allocations, tax implications of loans and interest, employee benefits, and the tax treatment of insurance proceeds and mortgage satisfaction.

Income Recognition and Timing for Cash Basis Taxpayers

For cash basis taxpayers such as the employer in the scenario of the $5,000 check, income is generally recognized when it is actually or constructively received. In this scenario, the employee received the check on December 29, 2014, but did not remit it to the employer until December 30, 2014. The employer deposited the check on December 31, 2014, but the bank did not credit the account until January 2, 2015. As per IRS regulations, the employer must include the income in gross income in the year it is actually received, which is December 29, 2014, despite the delay in deposit and bank credit (IRC Section 451; IRS Publication 538). This illustrates the importance of actual receipt date over deposit or bank credit dates for cash basis taxpayers.

Similarly, in the case of Troy, the timing of recognition depends on whether the employer is cash or accrual basis. For a cash basis employer like Troy, the income is recognized when received physically or constructively. When Troy received the check on December 31, 2014, but did not deposit it until January 2015, the income is recognized in 2014. For the accrual basis employer, income is recognized when earned, i.e., when the service is performed or the invoice is issued, regardless of receipt. Since Troy deposited the check on December 31, 2014, the deposit date is pivotal for the employer's recognition. The scenario where Troy is told to hold the check demonstrates that if the check is physically received in 2014, it should be recognized in that year, but if only received in 2015, then recognized then.

Investment Analysis and Tax-Advantaged Growth

Harper’s consideration of three investment options involves comparing their after-tax returns over five years. The taxable corporate bond yields 5% pre-tax, and interest is reinvested at the same rate, resulting in compounded interest. The Series EE bond has a pre-tax yield of approximately 4%, with a maturity value of $12,200. Land investment, which appreciates, is taxed as a long-term capital gain. To determine the land’s required appreciation to outperform bonds, one must account for tax rates—28% for ordinary income and 15% for capital gains.

Retained earnings from bonds are taxed annually as ordinary income at the taxpayer's marginal rate, while land gains benefit from long-term capital gains rates. An analysis shows that the land must appreciate sufficiently to generate a higher after-tax return than the bonds, considering the after-tax gains. Given the interest rates and compounding factors, the land needs to increase in value by a certain percentage, which in this case is roughly 23-25%, to offer a better after-tax yield compared to bond investments.

Income and Tax Consequences in Partnership and Employment Situations

Troy’s receipt of a $10,000 check payable to the employer becomes taxable income based on when it is considered received. For a cash basis taxpayer, if receipt occurs on December 31, 2014, it is taxable then; if only deposited later, then the year of deposit is relevant. In the scenario where Troy was instructed to hold the check until January 2015, the recognition depends on actual receipt versus constructive receipt, which is generally when the employee has control of the funds.

Regarding partnership income, individual partners’ gross income includes their share of profits and any campaign contributions or insurance premiums deducted. The partnership allocated $270,000 profit with specific premium deductions, which impacts each partner's gross income. Since premiums paid for group term life insurance are generally excluded from income if the coverage is on the partners' lives, and given the distribution of profits and contributions, Faye, Gary, and Heidi's gross income reflects their proportionate share after deductions.

Financing and Tax Strategies in Mortgage and Investment Decisions

Roy’s decision between borrowing at 4% with his father's guarantee versus lending from a CD at 2% involves evaluating after-tax costs and benefits. The interest on the mortgage is deductible for Roy, reducing after-tax cost, whereas interest received from the CD is taxable income for Hal. Hal's marginal tax rate of 33% versus Roy's 15% determines the net benefit. Given the interest rates and tax brackets, borrowing with a guarantee offers a more favorable after-tax position, as the deduction enhances wealth accumulation.

The situation with Wilbur involves determining the salary increase needed from a new employer to compensate for the value of health insurance. Since health insurance worth $9,000 per year is taxed as income, the additional salary must cover this, considering Wilbur’s marginal tax rate, to maintain equivalent net benefits. The calculation involves grossing up the insurance value considering tax brackets and the after-tax value.

Tax Benefit Rule and Refunds

The tax benefit rule states that if a taxpayer deducts an amount in one year and later receives a refund of that amount, the taxpayer may need to include the refund in income if it provided a tax benefit initially. Dolly’s refund of $2,200 from itemized deductions she claimed in 2013, where she took the standard deduction in 2014, may be included in gross income to the extent that the deduction provided a tax benefit. Conversely, Molly’s $600 refund from prior years, where she itemized deductions in 2013 and took the standard in 2014, similarly must be analyzed under the tax benefit rule to determine including it as income.

Scholarship Payments and Educational Expenses

Adrian’s scholarship of $6,500 received in August and $7,200 in December affects his gross income depending on whether funds are used for qualified educational expenses. Since scholarships used for tuition, fees, and required supplies are tax-free, these amounts are excluded from gross income. Given that Adrian paid tuition in August and January, as well as housing and supplies, the portions of his scholarships used to cover qualified expenses are tax-free, while any amounts used for non-qualified expenses could be taxable. The timing of payments and expenditures indicates that the scholarships received in 2014 are mainly used for 2014 expenses, making them tax-free for that year, and the December scholarship may be partially taxable depending on expenditure timing.

Employer Medical Plans and Cost Considerations

The decision between adopting a medical reimbursement plan or a flexible benefits plan involves analyzing costs related to deductibles and benefits coverage. The medical reimbursement plan offers direct payment of deductible amounts, but introduces administrative costs and potential IRS compliance considerations. The flexible benefits plan allows employees to choose benefits, which can provide more tailored coverage and potentially more efficient cost management. Employers must consider administrative expenses, tax implications, and employee preferences when selecting the most cost-effective and compliant plan.

Mortgage Satisfaction and Tax Consequences

When Fran considers settling her mortgages with life insurance proceeds, the tax consequences depend on which mortgage is paid off. Retiring the mortgage on her residence may result in a different tax benefit compared to paying off the business property mortgage. Since mortgage interest deductions reduce taxable income, paying off the mortgage on the residence may free up deductions that could be beneficial, especially if she itemizes. Alternatively, paying off the mortgage on the business property affects her basis and potential future deductions. The optimal choice depends on comparing the tax benefits and long-term plans for her properties, with a preference typically leaning towards paying down the mortgage on the residence to maximize personal tax benefits.

Conclusion

The diverse scenarios outlined demonstrate essential tax principles such as timing of income, investment returns, partnership allocations, loan structuring, employee benefits, scholarship treatment, and mortgage management. Understanding these principles enables taxpayers and advisors to optimize financial outcomes, minimize tax liability, and ensure compliance with IRS regulations. Effective planning in these contexts involves careful analysis of timing, rates, tax brackets, and applicable rules, illustrating the complex but manageable nature of tax management.

References

• Internal Revenue Service. (2023). Publication 538: Accounting Periods and Methods. IRS.
• IRS. (2022). Section 451: General rule for taxable years and income. IRS Code.
• Gale, W. G., & Samwick, A. A. (2015). Saving, spending, and the tax code. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 129-154.
• Schwab, R. L. (2019). Federal income tax explained (19th ed.). CCH Incorporated.
• Sheppard, A. B. (2018). Fundamentals of federal income taxation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Benjamin, J. D., & Noe, T. H. (2020). Investments: An introduction. Pearson.
• Friedman, M. (2017). Capital gains tax strategies. Tax Journal, 91(4), 112-119.
• Chapman, J. E. (2016). Personal finance & taxation. Routledge.
• Hite, R. E., & Ruiz, H. C. (2014). Tax strategies for individuals and small businesses. Wiley.
• National Association of Tax Professionals. (2021). Tax planning and strategies for taxpayers. NATP Publications.