Chapter 5 Building Identity Socialization Summary
Chapter 5building Identity Socializationchapter Summary
Identity includes a person’s sense of self and the social categories to which she or he belongs. Our identities are formed through socialization in the social, historical, and cultural context into which we were born. Social Structure and the Construction of Human Beings In the nature vs. nurture debate, those who favor nature argue that we are what we are because of our genetic inheritance, while those who favor nurture hold that we are born a blank slate and become who we are because of our environment. Recent genetic research suggests a significant role for nature, but most sociologists maintain that our social environment plays a much larger role.
Cultures and societies define which genetically determined traits are treated as meaningful differences. Socialization: Learning Who We Are Socialization is the process of learning the rules, values, and beliefs of a society. It is through socialization that a society reproduces itself, creating new members who share its culture. Socialization is a lifelong process during which we continuously learn new sets of norms and beliefs and form new identities based on our changing relationships and experiences (for example, Cahill’s work on the professional socialization of funeral directors). The Socialization of Self An early development in the socialization process is the emergence of a sense of self.
The self is both the source and the object of behavior. Our ability to carry on an internal dialogue with ourselves (reflexive behavior) allows us to incorporate the perceptions and expectations of other people into our behavior. We can thus control our conduct and modify our behavior in different social contexts. The acquisition of self is the process by which children are socialized into self-aware, self-controlled members of society. Charles Horton Cooley referred to the process in which we use the reactions of others towards us as mirrors in which to determine self-worth as the looking-glass self.
Through social interaction, young children acquire cognitive abilities such as the differentiation of self from others, the mastery of symbolic language, the development of role taking, and acknowledgment of the “generalized other.” George Herbert Mead described the mastery of role taking as a two-stage process. In the play stage, children practice taking the perspective of one “other” at a time through imaginary play. In the game stage, children are able to take on a group’s perspective and are able to attend to multiple perspectives at once. At this stage, children are able to play games with rules and multiple players. Finally, children are able to utilize the “generalized other”—the perspective of society—in regulating their behavior.
Resocialization and Total Institutions In total institutions, such as prisons and military training camps, individuals are isolated from the wider society and purposefully (even forcefully) resocialized to meet the needs of the organization or of society. In some situations, the power of resocialization has been exploited to tragic ends. The Structural Context of Socialization Our culture, our position in the social structure, and the social networks in which we exist condition our experiences, and thus influence the self-concept which we develop. Social institutions such as the education system, religion, and the media are central socializing agents in our society. In school, children learn various skills, political and social values, and ideas about their position and opportunities in the social hierarchy.
Functionalists see schools as dedicated to the general socialization of young people, while conflict theorists see schools as existing to train children to be conforming and passive members of the current social system. While there have been shifts in the ways individuals experience religion, this institution still plays a role in socialization. Today, people are more likely to change religions over the course of their lives. The media not only create a particular view of reality, but they also provide us with an avenue through which we learn dominant cultural values and stereotypes. Social category memberships also affect individuals’ socialization.
Social class, race/ethnicity, and gender all influence socialization. For example, social class influences how parents raise their children. Kohn (1979) found that middle class parents raise their children to be self-directed and curious, while working class parents raise their children to be obedient to authority. These traits are related to success in middle class versus working class occupations. The social constructions of race and ethnicity also influence socialization.
Race-conscious societies such as our own use racial and ethnic characteristics to attribute traits to members. Categorical definitions of race, the one-drop rule, and the construction of race as difference all influence racial socialization and identity. Different racial groups are taught different messages about race. Members of minority groups must learn how to be members of their own group, members of the dominant society, and minority members of the dominant society. The Socialization of Gender The distinction between sex (a biological classification) and gender (the learned social, psychological, and cultural interpretations of sex) is important because it suggests that many of the differences between men and women and between masculine and feminine are socially constructed.
In many cultures, sexual characteristics do not necessitate particular gender roles, and gender may be seen as shifting throughout the life course. In our culture, the dichotomization of male and female is central to our social structure, and the consequent gender dichotomy organizes individual life and the larger social institutions. In fact, our insistence on two and only two sexes has meant that intersexual people (hermaphrodites) are surgically altered to conform. Gender socialization is a process that begins at birth. Girls and boys are treated differently, learn different expectations and goals, and develop different self-concepts.
Most parents conform to gender-based expectations in their child rearing, though this may be unconscious. Children also receive messages about gender-appropriate behavior from the media and in school. For example, the majority of characters in children’s stories, television programs, and films are male, and the activities and personalities of the male and female characters tend to be portrayed in stereotypical ways.
Paper For Above instruction
Building Identity Through the Lens of Socialization: Analyzing Formation of Self in Society
Identity formation is a complex and ongoing process that is deeply embedded in the social fabric of our lives. Central to understanding how individuals develop their sense of self is the process of socialization, through which societal norms, values, and roles are transmitted across generations. This paper explores the multifaceted process of socialization, emphasizing its role in shaping personal and social identities, and examining the influence of various social institutions and categories in this developmental journey.
The debate between nature and nurture remains a foundational discussion in understanding identity formation. While genetic inheritance undeniably influences physical traits and potentially some behavioral tendencies, sociologists largely argue that social environment, including culture, family, education, media, race, ethnicity, and gender, plays a more significant role in shaping the self. This perspective underscores how societal expectations and cultural meanings attached to biologically determined traits influence which differences are deemed meaningful and how individuals interpret their roles within society.
Socialization is fundamentally a process of learning norms, values, and beliefs that enable individuals to integrate into society. This lifelong process begins in childhood and continues through adolescence and adulthood. During this process, individuals develop a self-concept—a sense of who they are, which is continuously refined through interactions with others. Charles Horton Cooley’s concept of the "looking-glass self" illustrates how feedback from others helps individuals evaluate their self-worth, effectively forming an image of themselves based on societal reactions.
A key facet of social development is the acquisition of cognitive abilities through social interaction, such as differentiating self from others, mastering symbolic language, developing role-taking capacities, and understanding the perspective of the "generalized other." George Herbert Mead described this development as occurring in stages, starting from the play stage, wherein children imitate others, to the game stage, where they understand complex social roles and rules, culminating in the internalization of the societal perspective—the generalized other—that guides behavior during adulthood.
Resocialization, particularly within total institutions like prisons and military camps, illustrates how environments can intentionally or forcibly alter an individual’s self-concept. These settings often isolate individuals from their prior social roles and require the adoption of new identities aligned with institutional purposes. However, such resocialization can also be exploited negatively, raising ethical concerns about the manipulation of individual identities in these contexts.
The social context, including one's position within a social hierarchy and participation in social networks, significantly influences identity development. Institutions such as education, religion, and media serve as primary socializing agents. Schools, for example, introduce children to skills, political and social values, and reinforce societal hierarchies. Functionalists view schooling as essential for general socialization, whereas conflict theorists critique it as a tool for maintaining social inequalities by promoting conformity among students.
Religion continues to shape socialization despite evolving perceptions. It imparts moral values, community bonds, and cultural continuity, though younger generations tend to experience religion differently, often detaching from traditional doctrines. Media also plays a powerful role in socialization by constructing cultural narratives, shaping perceptions of reality, and reinforcing stereotypes, including those related to gender, race, and class.
The influence of social categories—race, ethnicity, class, and gender—is profound in socialization. Social class, for example, affects parenting styles and educational opportunities. Middle-class parents tend to raise children to be self-directed and curious, fostering traits associated with success in modern economies, whereas working-class parents emphasize obedience and conformity. Racial and ethnic identities are social constructs that influence how members perceive themselves and interact with societal expectations. For instance, racial socialization involves transmitting messages about race and ethnicity, often embedded with societal stereotypes and biases.
Gender socialization reveals how biological sex distinctions are complemented and reinforced by societal expectations, roles, and behaviors. Though sex denotes biological differences, gender encompasses the social and cultural expectations associated with being male or female. This process begins at birth and continues through childhood, with children receiving cues from family, media, and education that shape their self-concepts and behaviors according to gender stereotypes. These stereotypes often limit individuals’ opportunities and reinforce gender inequalities, highlighting the importance of understanding gender as a socially constructed phenomenon.
In conclusion, the formation of identity is a complex interplay of biological, social, and cultural factors. Socialization remains central to this process, influencing how individuals perceive themselves andtheir roles within society. Recognizing the ways social institutions, social categories, and cultural norms shape our identities is crucial for understanding social dynamics and promoting inclusivity and equality in diverse societies.
References
- Bloom, L. (2013). Language and the Social Self: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Routledge.
- Charon, J. M. (2010). Symbolic Interactionism: An Introduction, An Interpretation, An Integral Approach. Pearson.
- Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Anchor Books.
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press.
- Grytten, O. H. (2011). Socialization and Identity Formation in Modern Society. Sociological Perspectives, 54(3), 375–391.
- Kohn, M. L. (1979). Class and Conformity: A Study in Values and Revolt. D.C. Heath and Company.
- Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. University of California Press.
- Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books.
- Rosenhan, D. L. (1973). On Being Sane in Insane Places. Science, 179(4070), 250-258.
- Williams, C. L. (1995). Still a Man’s World: Men Who Do Women’s Work. University of California Press.