Chapters 15 And 16 Homework SCM 4881 In Manufacturing

Chapters 15 16 Homework Scm 4881 In Manufacturing We Typically S

In manufacturing, scheduling strategies often prioritize the final operation to ensure delivery deadlines are met, proceeding to schedule earlier steps in reverse order. Finite loading requires understanding capacity and actual work center performance to achieve input-output control. The use of input-output charts reveals deviations from planned inputs and outputs, highlighting issues such as sporadic inbound deliveries and inconsistent output levels. Gantt load and schedule charts are instrumental in visualizing workload, idle times, and jobs in process, aiding in determining job completion times and scheduling maintenance windows. Assignment methods, such as the Hungarian algorithm, optimize task allocations to minimize costs, exemplified through operator-job assignments. Job sequencing based on due dates (EDD), processing times (SPT), or critical ratios enhances workflow, though each has different impacts on metrics like average completion time, utilization, system load, and job lateness. Critical ratio scheduling considers due dates and remaining work to prioritize urgent jobs, crucial in penalty-sensitive environments.

Demand-pull systems, notably Kanban, facilitate just-in-time manufacturing by signaling when replenishment is needed via visual cards or bins, reducing overproduction and waiting times. The number of bins required depends on demand, lead times, and safety stock, with a typical calculation involving EOQ, demand rate, and total lead time. Value stream mapping assesses total process time, process time per step, and available work time to determine value-added percentages, crucial in identifying waste in lean manufacturing. Scheduling efforts aim to balance minimizing completion times, maximizing equipment utilization, reducing work-in-process inventory, and controlling job lateness. Effective short-term scheduling aligns manufacturing activities with strategic goals, leveraging input-output controls, job sequencing, and pull systems to optimize operational efficiency and reduce costs.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective manufacturing management hinges on strategic scheduling and process optimization to meet delivery deadlines while minimizing costs and waste. The concepts explored across Chapters 15 and 16 underscore the importance of employing various scheduling techniques, understanding input-output variability, and implementing pull systems such as Kanban to create responsive and lean production environments.

One foundational principle in manufacturing scheduling is the sequencing of operations. It is standard practice to schedule the final operation first to ensure that processed products meet the shipping deadline. This approach is particularly effective in job shop and project environments where customer demands dictate strict due dates. The earlier steps are then scheduled in reverse order, often called backward or reverse scheduling, to align with the final delivery commitment. This approach is complemented by the use of finite loading, which considers capacity constraints at each work center. Finite loading ensures that only achievable workloads are scheduled, preventing overallocation and enabling realistic production plans that can adapt to capacity limitations or unexpected disruptions.

The input-output chart analysis illustrates the disparities between planned and actual inputs and outputs. For example, receiving fewer parts than scheduled or producing less than planned can cause backlog accumulation or shortages, impacting delivery schedules. These deviations highlight the need for real-time monitoring and adjustments, supported by visual tools like Gantt charts. Gantt load and schedule charts are critical in visualizing workload distribution, idle times, and process bottlenecks, facilitating proactive management. By analyzing these charts, managers can identify optimal times for maintenance activities, such as in electronics work centers, where downtime can be scheduled during low workload periods without impacting throughput.

Task assignment and job sequencing are vital components of operational efficiency. The Hungarian algorithm provides an optimal solution for assigning tasks to operators to minimize total cost or time, as exemplified with three operators and three jobs. Proper assignment ensures balanced workloads and reduces idle times. Similarly, job sequencing strategies directly influence productivity metrics. Sequencing by due date (EDD) prioritizes jobs based on deadlines, minimizing job lateness. Conversely, sequencing by shortest processing time (SPT) reduces average completion times, thereby increasing throughput and throughput efficiency. LPT (longest processing time) sequencing can be favorable for maximizing resource utilization but may lead to increased job lateness.

Critical ratio (CR) becomes particularly useful in environments where meeting delivery deadlines is paramount, such as in automotive parts manufacturing. The CR compares the time until a job's due date with the remaining processing time, prioritizing jobs with lower ratios to reduce lateness. This dynamic scheduling method is effective in managing urgent or penalty-heavy jobs, ensuring that resources are allocated to minimize late deliveries and associated penalties.

Pull systems, especially Kanban, exemplify lean manufacturing principles by producing only what is needed, when it is needed, thus reducing waste. Implementing a Kanban-based system involves specifying the number of containers or cards needed based on demand, lead times, and safety stock levels. For example, if the demand is 500 units per day, with a lead time of 2 days, and an EOQ of 250 units, a calculation shows that approximately five bins are necessary to maintain a smooth flow without overstocking. The use of multiple bins or cards ensures a continuous flow, minimizes excess inventory, and enables quick response to demand fluctuations.

Value stream mapping (VSM) is a powerful tool for analyzing the flow of materials and information across the production process. It facilitates identification of non-value-added activities and waste, such as excess motion, overproduction, waiting, and unnecessary transportation. Calculating the time for each process step to produce a specific quantity (e.g., 1000 units) allows management to pinpoint bottlenecks and refine process efficiency. The ratio of value-added time to total lead time quantifies process efficiency, with lean manufacturing aiming for the lowest possible non-value-added time.

In summary, leveraging advanced scheduling techniques, input-output monitoring, pull systems like Kanban, and value stream mapping creates a robust manufacturing environment. These strategies ensure production flexibility, responsiveness, and waste reduction, ultimately driving competitive advantage through improved turnaround times, reduced inventory, and adherence to delivery commitments.

References

• Goldratt, E. M., & Cox, J. (2004). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press.
• Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. CRC Press.
• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management. Pearson.
• Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 129-149.
• Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Simon & Schuster.
• Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2011). Factory Physics. Waveland Press.
• Chung, S. H., & Kim, J. (2009). Application of the critical ratio scheduling method in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 47(21), 5971-5992.
• Rosenbaum, D., & Twieg, J. (2015). Value stream mapping as a lean tool. Technical Operations Society Journal, 31(4), 46-50.
• Monden, Y. (2011). Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-In-Time. CRC Press.
• Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., & Zogopoulos, V. (2019). A review of manufacturing scheduling and industry 4.0 integration. Procedia Manufacturing, 34, 881-888.