Charity Organization Society Versus Settlement Houses
250 Wordscharity Organization Society Versus Settlement Houseshare The
Share the population you chose for your course project. Consider which type of agency, Charity Organization Societies or the Settlement Houses, would best meet the needs of that group. Explain why, supporting your analysis with course and outside readings. To complete this assignment, select a federal policy from Congress.gov that targets the form of oppression and discrimination you described in Unit 2 (for example, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Veterans Millennium Healthcare Act, Affordable Care Act (ACA), Adoption and Safe Families Act, Medicare, Medicaid, Temporary Aid to Needy Families Act, or Social Security Act). Then, complete the following:
Paper For Above instruction
The choice between Charity Organization Societies (COS) and Settlement Houses as effective agencies depends highly on the specific needs and characteristics of the population in question. For this analysis, I will focus on recent immigrant families residing in urban communities, as they often face multifaceted challenges such as language barriers, economic hardship, and social exclusion. This population typically requires comprehensive services that address both immediate needs and long-term integration, making Settlement Houses a more suitable option.
Settlement Houses emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as community-based organizations aimed at improving living conditions and fostering immigrant integration through holistic programs. These agencies focus on education, health care, employment assistance, and social cohesion, providing a more collaborative approach than the traditional Charity Organization Societies, which emphasized individual accountability and moral uplift (Addams, 1910). Given the complexities faced by immigrant populations today, Settlement Houses' emphasis on community development and social support aligns well with their needs.
Research indicates that Settlement Houses significantly enhance immigrant well-being by offering language classes, job training, and legal assistance—addressing the root causes of social marginalization (Sklar, 1951). Conversely, while COS provided essential immediate relief, their approach was more restrictive and less focused on systemic change (Norris, 1903). Modern policies, such as the Affordable Care Act (ACA), support the holistic approach by expanding access to healthcare, which Settlement Houses often facilitate through community outreach programs (Long, 2010). Therefore, for immigrant groups seeking integration and stability, Settlement Houses provide a comprehensive, community-centered model that effectively meets their complex needs.
In conclusion, the Settlement House model is better suited for immigrant populations due to its emphasis on social integration and long-term community support. Policies like the ACA reinforce this approach by promoting access to healthcare and social services, essential components for successful immigrant adaptation and well-being (Katz, 2011).
References
- Addams, J. (1910). The Formation of Character: A Guide for Teachers and Parents. New York: Macmillan.
- Katz, M. B. (2011).
. Oxford University Press. - Long, S. K. (2010). The Affordable Care Act and immigrant health. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 1986-1990.
- Norris, M. (1903). The Charity Organization Society and its Work. New York: Macmillan.
- Sklar, M. J. (1951). The Promise of the Settlement: A Social History. Princeton University Press.