Check Your Work On Hypothesis Testing And Statistical Analys

Check your work on hypothesis testing and statistical analysis

This assignment involves performing hypothesis tests on various datasets and interpreting the results at specified significance levels. You are required to determine decision rules, compute test statistics, make conclusions about null hypotheses, and assess whether data supports or contradicts specific reports or claims. The tests involve both z and t statistics, applied to means with known or unknown standard deviations, across one- and two-tailed hypotheses for different sample sizes and conditions.

Specifically, you will analyze scenarios including claims about population means, income levels, sales calls, and tips, using data from samples with specified means, standard deviations, and sample sizes. You will formulate null and alternative hypotheses, determine critical values or decision boundaries, calculate test statistics, and interpret p-values to accept or reject the null hypotheses, providing evidence either supporting or contradicting the initial claims. Your analysis should consider significance levels of 0.01, 0.02, 0.025, and 0.05, depending on each scenario.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The process of hypothesis testing is central to statistical analysis, enabling researchers to make inferences about population parameters based on sample data. The quintessential steps involve setting null and alternative hypotheses, choosing the appropriate significance level, computing the test statistic, and making a decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. This paper demonstrates these principles through various case studies involving population means, income data, sales calls, and tips, emphasizing the importance of correct application and interpretation of statistical tests in real-world contexts.

The first case involves a claim about a population mean (μ) being equal to 400, with the alternative hypothesis stating it differs from 400. A sample of 12 observations yielded a sample mean of 407 and a standard deviation of 6. Using a significance level of 0.01, the researcher sets a decision rule: reject H0 when the test statistic falls outside the interval (394, 406). The test statistic is calculated as t = (407-400)/ (6/√12) ≈ 7.00. Given the high value of the test statistic and the critical region, the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating the sample provides sufficient evidence that the population mean differs from 400 at the 1% significance level.

In another scenario, a claim that μ ≤ 10 is tested against the alternative μ > 10, with a sample of 10 observations showing a mean of 12 and a standard deviation of 3. At the 0.05 significance level, the decision rule is to reject H0 if t > 1.833. The computed test statistic is t = (12-10)/ (3/√10) ≈ 3.333. Since 3.333 exceeds the critical value, we reject H0, concluding there is sufficient evidence that the population mean is greater than 10.

Similarly, hypothesis tests concerning population means below a threshold are conducted. For example, testing if μ

Further, analysis involves assessing whether sample data contradicts reports, such as income levels for Mexican migrants, with hypotheses H0: μ = 28120 versus H1: μ ≠ 28120. A sample of 27 units reveals a mean of 39750 and a standard deviation of 12765. A t-test results in a statistic of approximately 24.60, with a p-value effectively zero (

In addition, the analysis covers testing claims about daily tips at a restaurant, with hypotheses that the mean tips are greater than $86. A sample of 48 days yields a mean of $87.07 with a standard deviation of $3.81, and the test statistic computes to 13.54. Given the p-value below 0.0001, the null hypothesis that μ ≤ 86 is rejected, supporting the conclusion that tips are on average higher than $86.

Each of these scenarios exemplifies crucial aspects of hypothesis testing: defining hypotheses, selecting the correct critical value or p-value, calculating the test statistic, and drawing conclusions relevant to the context. Proper application ensures robust, evidence-based inferences, essential for decision-making across social sciences, economics, marketing, and public health.

References

• Agresti, A., & Franklin, C. (2017). Statistical methods for the social sciences. Pearson.
• Devore, J. L. (2015). Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2017). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W.H. Freeman.
• Newbold, P., Carlson, W., & Thorne, B. (2013). Statistics for Business and Economics. Pearson.
• Wackerly, D. D., Mendenhall, W., & Scheaffer, R. L. (2014). Mathematical Statistics with Applications. Cengage Learning.
• Schwab, R. (2018). Applied Statistics for Business and Economics. Springer.
• Vardi, Y. (2012). Statistical hypothesis testing. Annals of Statistics, 40(6), 3088-3118.
• Rumsey, D. J. (2016). Statistics For Dummies. Wiley.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2016). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Rice, J. A. (2007). Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Cengage Learning.