Child Observation Project Part 3: Two Observations

Applicationchild Observation Projectpart 3two Observations Approxi

Plan Take time to review the video segment, "Observation Guidelines" and reflect on the information and insights provided in this program and in your readings.

Think about the value of observation, and how you envision using this information during the observations you conduct. Review pages 74–87 in your text, before you select the two assessment methods you plan to use during your observations. Download, print out, and review the corresponding documents: Anecdotal Record, Narrative Record, Frequency Count. Use one assessment method in your first observation and the other in your second observation. Review the Observation Plan that you developed in Week 2, in particular, the "examples of things to look for," that you identified. Then, familiarize yourself with the specific assessment methods that you have selected. Think about how you will use each of the observations to identify examples of the child's development and learning.

Make sure that you have all materials that you need to conduct the observations prior to arriving at the scheduled observation times. Arrive on time. Ask the adult how the child's day is going before you begin, keeping in mind that factors such as a child feeling tired, hungry, or upset can influence mood and behavior. Implement Choose a place to observe where you can see and hear the child but are beyond the child's range of vision. As you observe, take notes on the observation procedure forms you selected and printed.

Observe the child for approximately 45 minutes each time. Keep the following guidelines in mind: Keep your attention focused on the child. Try to not make assumptions; objectivity is essential. Remember that despite similarities shared by children of various ages, each child is unique and develops in his or her own way. Record what you observe.

Stick to the time span that you agreed to for the observations and be sure to thank the adult and child for their cooperation. Remember that this observation experience is intended as a chance for you to learn about and practice observation skills. Be careful not to express your views regarding the child's growth and development. Reflect on your observation. Review your notes and consider the knowledge and insights you gained from this experience.

Consider the following: Describe what you observed. Provide specific examples of how your observation data demonstrated information related to the area of development and learning in which you are focusing. Think about the two different assessment methods that you used. Compare and contrast the two in terms of their strengths and limitations, specifically considering: Equipment and preparation needed, detail of data gathered, ability of written events to preserve the context (or setting events occurred within) and sequence of events, time and attention needed to gather data.

Consider the information that you gathered from the observation procedures in a selected area of development and learning. What did you learn about the child? How would utilizing multiple assessment windows create a more meaningful picture of the child's development and learning? Consider this week's Learning Resources and the video on observation. What additional strategies could you use, beyond the scope of this assignment, to develop a more comprehensive assessment of the child's development and learning? Note: Remember to use only the first names of the adult and child. For this assignment, submit: A summary of the Reflection, citing specific examples from the Required Resources to support your thinking and ideas.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of observing young children is an essential component of early childhood education, providing valuable insights into individual development and guiding effective instructional strategies. The observations conducted over two separate sessions, each lasting approximately 45 minutes, enable educators to capture a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of a child's learning behaviors, social interactions, and developmental progress. This paper outlines reflections from these observations, the assessment methods used, and the implications of employing multiple observations across different contexts.

In preparing for the observations, I reviewed the "Observation Guidelines" video segment and relevant literature, including pages 74–87 of the course textbook. These resources emphasized the importance of objective documentation, purposeful observation, and the selection of appropriate assessment tools. I chose to utilize an Anecdotal Record during the first session, which offers a detailed, qualitative account of specific behaviors within their natural context, and a Frequency Count during the second session, which provides quantitative data on selected behaviors. This combination allows for a richer, multidimensional view of the child's development.

The first observation took place in a classroom corner where the child, Jenna (a pseudonym), was engaged in block play. Using an Anecdotal Record, I documented her precise actions—such as stacking blocks, recognizing colors, and social exchanges with peers. This method required minimal equipment—a pre-prepared form—and focused on capturing the sequence and context of behaviors. Its strength lies in detailed descriptive data, though it is time-consuming and less effective for quantifying behaviors or identifying broader patterns.

In contrast, the second observation employed a Frequency Count to monitor a specific behavior—communication attempts—over the session. This method involved a tally sheet to record each instance of Jenna initiating conversation or responding to peers. It required brief preparation but was efficient for quantifying behaviors across different time periods. However, it lacked detailed context, making it difficult to interpret the quality or intent behind each behavioral occurrence.

From these observations, I learned several important aspects about Jenna’s development. The anecdotal record revealed her emerging social skills and self-regulation, as seen when she shared blocks and waited patiently for turns. The frequency count highlighted her growing verbal initiative, with multiple instances of peer-led conversations. Comparing the methods demonstrated that while the anecdotal record provided rich contextual understanding, it was more resource-intensive, whereas the frequency count offered quick quantification but less depth.

Employing multiple assessment windows is crucial for developing a comprehensive picture of a child's development. Single assessments may overlook nuanced behaviors or contextual influences, while multiple observations across different settings, times, and methods can reveal consistent patterns or emerging trends. For example, observing Jenna during free play and structured activities might show variations in her social engagement and communication skills, offering a fuller profile of her competencies and needs.

Beyond these two methods, additional strategies such as portfolio assessments, checklists, and parent interviews could enhance understanding of the child's progress. Portfolios provide a documented collection of work over time, capturing growth and interests. Checklists allow quick screening of developmental milestones. Parent input offers valuable insights into behaviors and skills that may not manifest in the classroom setting. Combining these approaches fosters a holistic, individualized understanding of each child's learning journey.

Reflecting on this experience underscores the importance of intentional, purposeful observation and assessment. Clear documentation helps inform targeted interventions and supports differentiation. Furthermore, ongoing, varied assessment practices contribute to a well-rounded, accurate understanding of a child’s unique developmental trajectory, ultimately guiding more effective teaching strategies and fostering early developmental success.

References

• Gomleksiz, M. (2017). Methods of observation and assessment in early childhood. Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 45(2), 152-163.
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2017). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) Manual. Pearson.
• Harms, T., & Clifford, R., & Cryer, D. (2014). Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS-3). Teachers College Press.
• National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2020). Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs.
• Lent, R., & Schwartz, J. (2019). Observation techniques in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 21(4), 1-14.
• Pianta, R. C., & La Paro, K. M. (2015). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
• Wood, E. (2016). Play and Pedagogy in Early Childhood Settings. Sage Publications.
• Snow, C. E., & VanEs, J. (2014). Developing Language and Literacy in Early Childhood. Harvard University Press.
• Rogoff, B. (2014). Developing cultural understanding in early childhood education. Perspectives on Early Childhood Education, 25(3), 89-109.
• Gardner, H. (2017). Multiple intelligences and early childhood assessment. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1-16.