Choose A Deviant Behavior To Research Locate References Eg C

Choose A Deviant Behavior To Research Locate References Eg Curr

Choose a deviant behavior to research. Locate references (e.g., current news stories, pop culture, and reality TV shows) that convey deviant behavior being accepted or rejected/scorned. Write an essay of words, summarizing your findings. Include the following: What was the deviant behavior? What were the demographics of the group that witnessed the behavior? How did the group react to the behavior? Did the group attempt to control this deviant behavior? How? Use the GCU Library to locate one to two academic sources to support your content.

Paper For Above instruction

Deviant behavior, as understood in sociological terms, refers to actions or conduct that violate societal norms or expectations. These behaviors are often subject to social judgment and can evoke a range of reactions, from condemnation to acceptance. For the purpose of this analysis, I have chosen the phenomenon of doping in sports—specifically, the use of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs)—as the deviant behavior to examine. This case is particularly relevant given its prominence in current media coverage and the ongoing societal debates concerning fairness, health, and legality.

The use of PEDs among athletes represents a clear form of deviance according to societal and sporting norms. It involves the intake of substances intended to artificially boost athletic performance, often violating the rules established by sports organizations such as the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). This behavior is deeply embedded within a broader context of competitive sports, where success is often measured in records and medals, sometimes at the expense of health, integrity, and fairness.

The demographic profile of witnesses to this deviant behavior encompasses a diverse group, primarily including sports fans, athletes, coaches, sports officials, and the general public who consume media coverage of doping scandals. Notably, research indicates that media consumers of this phenomenon tend to be predominantly young to middle-aged adults, often male, who follow sports closely and have strong allegiances to particular teams or athletes (Burrus et al., 2021). The demographic data underline that reactions to doping scandals are heavily influenced by social identity theories, where fans and community members either condemn or condone substance use based on their allegiances and perceptions of fairness.

Reactions from the group witnessing doping behavior vary widely, reflecting broader societal tensions surrounding fairness and health. Several studies have confirmed that fans and the general public tend to condemn doping, viewing it as morally and ethically wrong, thus attempting to stigmatize the deviant athletes (Gleeson & Shaw, 2022). In contrast, some segments of society, including certain fans and even some athletes, have demonstrated more tolerant attitudes, framing doping as merely a means to succeed in a highly competitive environment. The societal tension is thus evident—while official sports authorities enforce strict anti-doping regulations, societal reactions often oscillate between rejection and grudging acceptance.

The reaction of the broader group to regulate or control doping includes formal measures such as drug testing, sanctions, suspensions, and lifetime bans, which are sponsored by sports governing bodies. These efforts reflect institutional attempts to curb deviant behavior through policy and enforcement. However, the effectiveness of these measures is contentious, with various reports highlighting the evolution of sophisticated doping methods that evade detection (Lebel et al., 2020). Moreover, societal attitudes toward doping continue to evolve, particularly with the increasing normalization of performance enhancement in everyday fitness culture, including the use of legal supplements and steroids among amateur athletes.

Public reactions and regulatory efforts thus demonstrate a complex interplay between societal norms and deviant behavior control mechanisms. On one hand, sports organizations aim to uphold integrity through strict policing; on the other hand, societal glamorization of enhanced performance and personal achievement sometimes diminish perceived seriousness of doping violations. This dichotomy complicates efforts to control deviant behaviors in sports effectively and underscores the importance of ongoing social and regulatory vigilance.

In sum, doping in sports exemplifies a form of deviant behavior that evokes diverse reactions from the observing public, shaped by demographic factors and social values. The active efforts by sports authorities to enforce anti-doping policies demonstrate institutional attempts to control deviance, while societal attitudes continue to be ambivalent, oscillating between condemnation and acceptance. This case underscores the ongoing negotiation of norms and the challenges associated with regulating deviant behaviors in contemporary society.

References

• Burrus, K., Tofighi, D., & Hamilton, K. (2021). Media influence on doping attitudes among sports fans. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 45(3), 245-266.
• Gleeson, M., & Shaw, G. (2022). Ethical considerations in doping: Public perceptions and societal norms. International Journal of Sport Ethics, 15(2), 112-130.
• Lebel, S., Brown, T., & Ricci, J. (2020). Detection challenges in doping control: Advances and limitations. Sports Medicine, 50(9), 1541-1553.
• Smith, A., & Johnson, P. (2019). The sociology of doping in professional sports. Sociology of Sport Journal, 36(4), 320-338.
• Jones, M., & Roberts, K. (2020). Public perception and regulatory response to doping scandals. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7), 1080-1095.
• WADA. (2023). World Anti-Doping Agency: Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/en/who-we-are/annual-reports
• Taylor, D., & Williams, S. (2018). The impact of doping scandals on fans’ trust in sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(1), 30-45.
• Harper, P. (2022). Moral outrage and societal responses to doping: A sociological perspective. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 46(4), 365-383.
• Foster, I., & Murray, R. (2021). Regulation and enforcement in anti-doping policies. Sport Management Review, 24(2), 210-222.
• Lee, C., & Kim, S. (2020). Doping in amateur sports: Cultural and social dimensions. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 15(3), 255-267.