Choose A Movie You Haven't Previously Seen From The Forum

Choose A Movie That You Have Not Previously Seen From The Following Li

Choose a movie that you have not previously seen from the following list: Mi Familia, My Big Fat Greek Wedding, I Am Sam, or Amistad. Watch the movie with this question in mind: What do people say and do that communicates in ways different from the way I do? Write an essay of words that answers the question with supporting details, quotes, and paraphrased statements from the movie. This is not a review of the movie, but an observation of the communication styles of the people in the movie. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of communication styles depicted in "Amistad" offers profound insights into how cultural, verbal, and non-verbal expressions serve as vital channels of meaning across diverse communities. "Amistad," directed by Steven Spielberg, recounts the historic 1839 slave ship rebellion, enabling viewers to observe complex modes of communication among Africans enslaved on the ship, their captors, and abolitionists. This essay explores how the characters' dialogues and behaviors in the film communicate differently from typical Western norms of expression, emphasizing cultural context, non-verbal cues, and linguistic nuance.

A significant aspect of communication in "Amistad" is the articulation of speech and its relation to cultural identity and power dynamics. The Africans’ use of their native languages—especially Kikuyu, Mende, and other dialects—serves as a profound expression of their identity and resistance against dehumanization. For example, during moments of distress or planning, the Africans communicate in their languages, often with gestures that convey emotions more effectively than words could. Their use of language emphasizes a collective identity and shared experience that contrasts sharply with the English-speaking captors’ more individualistic and often confrontational style of communication. This linguistic divergence underscores a fundamental difference in cultural approaches to expression, with the captors often relying on commands and interrogations (Spielberg, 1997).

Non-verbal communication also plays a critical role in the film, illustrating ways of conveying meaning that differ from Western verbal dominance. For instance, the Africans’ use of gestures, eye contact, and physical proximity conveys solidarity and resistance, even when their words are suppressed or misunderstood. A poignant example occurs when the Africans, despite being restrained and subdued, exchange meaningful glances and gestures that affirm their unity and dissent. These non-verbal cues often communicate defiance or hope where verbal communication might be impossible or insufficient. Such behaviors reflect a cultural communication style rooted in collective action and emotional expression, contrasting with the more individual-centered verbal interactions seen in Western settings.

Furthermore, the legal proceedings and courtroom scene exemplify differences in modes of communication across cultures and societal roles. Thirteen years after the rebellion, in a U.S. courtroom, legal language and courtroom etiquette become the primary modes of communication. The courtroom scenes demonstrate a shift from expressive, non-verbal, and emotionally charged communication to formal, procedural exchanges. This transition reveals how communication forms adapt to societal expectations and roles, emphasizing clarity, legality, and authority rather than emotional or cultural expression. The African characters’ struggle to have their story heard accentuates the cultural gap and highlights how different groups prioritize varied communication practices based on context and purpose.

Another notable aspect is the depiction of leadership and persuasion. The character of John Quincy Adams exemplifies a Western style of argumentation—structured, logical, and reliant on verbal articulation of rights and principles. In contrast, the Africans and abolitionists communicate through actions and collective resistance, which convey moral and emotional messages more powerfully than words. The film thus illustrates that communication is not only verbal but also embodied through actions that resonate with cultural values. The Africans’ steadfast unity, symbolized by their stillness and collective stance in court, exemplifies how non-verbal communication can challenge dominant narratives and evoke empathy.

In conclusion, "Amistad" vividly portrays diverse communication styles rooted in cultural identity, non-verbal cues, and contextual differences. The Africans’ use of native languages and gestures, alongside Western legal language and formal speech, underscores the multiplicity of ways humans convey meaning. This disparity emphasizes the importance of understanding cultural context to interpret communication accurately. It also highlights the resilience of expressive traditions outside of dominant societal norms, urging an appreciation for the myriad ways people communicate across different communities.

References

Spielberg, S. (Director). (1997). Amistad [Film]. DreamWorks Pictures.