Choose A Technology Platform That Allows You To Post Origina

Choose A Technology Platform That Allows You To Post Original Activiti

Choose a technology platform that allows you to post original activities and assignments. If you are already employed as a teacher, you may post this on an existing district site IF you are planning to use the materials in your class. Do not post anything on your district page that you will not actually use, as this will be confusing to your students and their parents. Create a welcome message and at least two original assignments on the page you create. To be considered for full credit, you need to post directions for a group project.

Examples of acceptable platforms are Google Classroom, Padlet, Class blog, Class website, as well as other platforms that are similar to these. Nearpod is not acceptable for this assignment. If you decide to use your current Google Classroom or similar virtual classroom (Schoology), please include screenshots of the assignments you have posted. These should be screenshots of the assignment explanation and not just the title of the post. Include a reflection in your assignment submission that discusses how you plan to use your chosen technology platform throughout the school year to - Promote cross-curricular learning Promote student collaboration (If you teach grades PreK-2nd grade you can reflect on how the chosen platform will help you connect with parents) *Copy/paste the state standards that each posted assignment/activity targets at the top of your reflection Make sure to review the rubric for this assignment.

Provide the URL AND provide screenshots that include your name and the learning activities you have created for this assignment. You must provide the URL and screenshots (pictures) of your work in case the instructor is unable to access the page you created. To embed images in your assignment:

Paper For Above instruction

Choose A Technology Platform That Allows You To Post Original Activiti

In the contemporary educational landscape, leveraging digital technology platforms has become essential for creating dynamic, engaging, and effective learning environments. Selecting an appropriate platform that allows for the posting of original activities and assignments is crucial for fostering student engagement, promoting collaboration, and aligning with curriculum standards. This paper explores key considerations in choosing a suitable technology platform, discusses practical implementation strategies, and reflects on how these tools can enhance teaching and learning processes throughout the academic year.

Criteria for Selecting a Technology Platform

The primary factors to consider when choosing a platform include ease of use, accessibility, versatility, and compatibility with existing school systems. An ideal platform should enable teachers to create and post original content without requiring extensive technical skills. It should be accessible across various devices such as computers, tablets, and smartphones to accommodate different student needs. Additionally, the platform must support multimedia content, collaboration features, and provide options for formative assessment and feedback.

Popular Platforms for Posting Activities and Assignments

Several platforms are widely used and recognized for their efficacy in educational settings. Google Classroom stands out as a leading choice due to its integration with Google Workspace tools, ease of use, and free access. Teachers can create multiple classes, post assignments, embed multimedia resources, and facilitate communication with students and parents. Padlet offers an intuitive interface for creating interactive boards where students can post responses, images, and videos, promoting collaboration. Class blogs and websites, whether hosted via platforms like WordPress or Weebly, provide customizable spaces for posting content, instructions, and multimedia resources, fostering a personalized learning environment.

Other platforms similar to these include Schoology, SeeSaw, and Moodle, each with unique features tailored to different educational needs. It is essential for educators to evaluate these options based on their specific instructional goals, student demographics, and technological infrastructure.

Implementation of the Chosen Platform

Once a platform is selected, effective implementation involves creating a welcoming space, posting clear instructions, and designing original activities aligned with curriculum standards. For example, on Google Classroom, teachers can craft a welcome message inviting students to engage with the activities. They can then post assignments such as a grammar activity, a science project, and a math challenge, each with detailed instructions and assessment criteria.

Developing a group project entails providing comprehensive directions, collaborative tools, and rubrics for evaluation. For instance, a group presentation project on environmental conservation can be outlined with milestones and peer review processes. Including multimedia resources, such as videos or diagrams, enhances understanding and engagement.

Reflection on Usage Throughout the School Year

Effective integration of the platform can significantly promote cross-curricular learning by linking concepts across subjects—for example, combining literacy with science through research assignments, or integrating art with history via visual projects. The platform also encourages student collaboration by enabling peer interactions within discussion boards, shared documents, and group assignments.

For teachers of younger grades, such as PreK-2nd, these platforms facilitate parent engagement by sharing student progress, providing communication channels, and showcasing student work. This fosters a community-oriented approach that supports student development and parental involvement.

Aligning activities with state standards is crucial for ensuring relevance and accountability. Teachers can copy and paste the relevant standards at the top of their reflections, demonstrating how each activity supports specific learning outcomes. For instance, a math activity targeting fractions aligns with state benchmarks on number mastery, while a science experiment on ecosystems corresponds with standards about biological processes.

Conclusion

Choosing an appropriate technology platform for posting original activities and assignments is a strategic decision that can enhance teaching effectiveness and student engagement. By considering usability, versatility, and standards alignment, educators can create meaningful learning experiences that promote collaboration, cross-curricular connections, and parental involvement. Careful implementation and ongoing reflection ensure that technological tools serve to enrich the educational process throughout the school year.

References

  1. Bebell, D., & O'Dwyer, L. M. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1), 1-15.
  2. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Matter. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
  3. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
  5. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). The NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium.
  6. Kimmons, R., & Russell, D. (2014). Digital Tools and Resources for the Contemporary Classroom. TechTrends, 58(1), 69-73.
  7. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical iterative cycles. Routledge.
  8. O’Dwyer, L., & Bebell, D. (2007). Student achievement in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(4), 379-403.
  9. Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of learning design on student engagement and performance: A cross-institution comparison. Computers & Education, 95, 4-17.
  10. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.