Choose One Business Or Corporate Scandal From The 10 B

Choose One Business Or Corporate Scandal From Eitherthe 10 Biggest Bus

Choose one business or corporate scandal from either the 10 Biggest Business Scandals of 2017. Explain whether the organization acted socially and ethically responsible regarding the incident. Describe what the organization should or could have done differently. Describe who or what was responsible for the incident. Explain the best way to ensure that such incidents do not recur, if possible. Recommend the best way for society, and stakeholders, to prevent future incidents of this type.

Paper For Above instruction

In 2017, one of the most significant corporate scandals was the Volkswagen emissions scandal, also known as "Dieselgate." This scandal involved Volkswagen intentionally manipulating diesel engine software to cheat emissions tests, making their vehicles appear environmentally friendly when, in fact, they emitted pollutants well above legal limits. This essay evaluates whether Volkswagen acted responsibly in their handling of the scandal, what they could have done differently, who or what was responsible, and how such incidents can be prevented in the future. Additionally, it offers recommendations for society and stakeholders to mitigate similar occurrences.

Introduction

The Volkswagen emissions scandal of 2015-2017 is considered one of the most consequential corporate scandals in recent history. The scandal unraveled when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) discovered that Volkswagen had installed software—referred to as "defeat devices"—on millions of diesel vehicles to manipulate emissions testing results. Volkswagen's actions not only betrayed consumer trust but also raised significant ethical and social concerns regarding corporate responsibility, environmental impact, and regulatory compliance. How Volkswagen responded to this crisis and the measures taken afterward reveal much about the company's ethical stance and the need for systemic safeguards to prevent future scandals.

Ethical Evaluation of Volkswagen’s Response

Initially, Volkswagen’s response lacked transparency and accountability, as the company attempted to deny and downplay the severity of the scandal. As investigations deepened, Volkswagen publicly admitted to the misconduct, but the initial reaction demonstrated a lack of social responsibility. Ethically, companies bear a responsibility to act transparently and prioritize public safety over profits. Volkswagen's later actions—such as recalling millions of vehicles, cooperating with authorities, and implementing compliance measures—can be viewed as steps toward ethical responsibility, but these came only after significant damage was done.

Despite these efforts, the company's delayed acknowledgment of the misconduct and its initial concealment of the software manipulation were unethical. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) mandates that organizations recognize their societal impact, including environmental stewardship. Volkswagen’s actions, in this regard, fell short because of self-interest and neglect of environmental and consumer rights.

What Could Have Been Done Differently?

Volkswagen could have acted ethically by proactively disclosing the issue once they identified irregularities during internal audits, rather than waiting for regulatory investigations. Implementing a robust internal compliance system designed to detect unethical practices early on would have been instrumental. Transparency and open communication could have mitigated reputational damage and demonstrated social responsibility. Additionally, the company should have prioritized environmental sustainability and consumer safety over short-term financial gains, aligning their corporate strategy with principles of ethical conduct.

Furthermore, fostering a corporate culture emphasizing ethics and accountability might have prevented the misconduct from occurring. Regular ethics training and establishing clear reporting mechanisms for unethical behavior could have empowered employees to speak up without fear of retaliation.

Responsibility for the Incident

The primary responsibility lies with Volkswagen’s top management, who authorized and encouraged the use of defeat devices to meet emissions standards artificially. Engineers and technical staff who developed and implemented the software also share responsibility. Regulatory bodies failed in their oversight to some extent, but their detection mechanisms were not sufficient to catch such sophisticated manipulations earlier. The scandal highlights a breakdown in corporate governance, internal controls, and regulatory effectiveness, with culpability distributed across organizational levels and oversight entities.

Preventing Future Incidents

Preventing similar scandals requires comprehensive reforms. Companies should establish strong ethical frameworks rooted in corporate culture that prioritize transparency, compliance, and environmental responsibility. Regular audits by independent third parties can identify irregularities early, and Whistleblower protection policies should be reinforced to encourage reporting unethical conduct. Additionally, enforceable international standards and stronger regulatory oversight are essential in deterring misconduct.

Adopting technological solutions like real-time emissions monitoring and blockchain-based compliance records can improve traceability and accountability. Educational initiatives on ethics and responsibility must be embedded in corporate training, fostering a culture that values integrity over profit.

Society and Stakeholders’ Role in Prevention

Society and stakeholders play a crucial role in preventing future scandals by demanding transparency, accountability, and sustainable practices from corporations. Consumers can support companies committed to environmental standards and ethical conduct, shaping market trends. Investors should perform thorough due diligence and prioritize Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors in their decisions. Governments and regulatory agencies must strengthen enforcement, close regulatory gaps, and impose strict penalties for misconduct to serve as deterrents.

Public awareness campaigns and media scrutiny serve to hold corporations accountable and promote ethical corporate behavior. International cooperation on regulation and oversight can lead to more consistent standards and reduce opportunities for corporate malpractice.

Conclusion

The Volkswagen emissions scandal epitomizes the failure of corporate social and ethical responsibility. While the company eventually took some remedial actions, their initial response was unethical and harmful to public trust and the environment. To prevent such incidents, organizations must embed ethics within their corporate culture, implement effective internal controls, and cooperate fully with regulators. Society, investors, and governments have a shared duty to promote transparency, accountability, and sustainability, ensuring that corporate misconduct becomes increasingly difficult and costly to perpetrate. Only through a concerted and collective effort can we foster a responsible corporate environment that prioritizes societal well-being over short-term profits.

References

• Banerjee, S. B. (2018). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 439–445.
• Cheng, M., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23.
• Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of a corporate culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance. Harvard Business School Working Paper.
• European Commission. (2017). Environmental audit and compliance in automotive industry. European Environment Agency Report.
• Norris, G. (2019). The ethical failures underlying the Volkswagen emissions scandal. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(2), 215–239.
• Sullivan, R. (2018). Responsible corporate conduct and regulatory effectiveness. OECD Journal on Corporate Governance, 4(2), 1-23.
• Vogel, D. (2018). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business and Society, 57(2), 215-232.
• Weber, M. (2019). Corporate environmental responsibility and the Volkswagen scandal. Environmental Science & Policy, 92, 94-103.
• Williams, C. C., & Schmid, S. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and the automotive industry: Lessons from Volkswagen. Business & Society, 57(2), 318–345.
• World Economic Forum. (2018). The future of corporate responsibility: Trends and best practices. WEF Reports.