Choose One Of The Following Case Scenarios To Complete

Chooseone 1of The Following Case Scenarios To Completecase Scenario

Choose one (1) of the following case scenarios to complete. Case Scenario 1: You may remember hearing about Martha Stewart's criminal conviction related to her sale of stock in a friend's company based on an insider tip that the friend was selling his shares of his own company's stock. (She actually went to jail not for the insider trading itself but for lying about what happened and her reasons for selling her shares of the stock.) Consider this situation from each perspective of egoism, utilitarianism, duty-based ethics, and virtue ethics as you answer the following questions and give reasons for your answers based on each of those ethical theories. Is insider trading inherently wrong? Or is it only wrong because it is illegal? In what sense was it ethical for Martha Stewart's stock broker to pass along to her the insider tip that her friend was selling off his stock in his company? In what sense was it unethical for the broker to do so? In what sense was it ethical for Martha Stewart to save herself from about $45,000 in losses by trading her stock based on the insider tip? In what sense was it unethical for her to do so? Case Scenario 2: Suppose you are opposed to the use of child labor in manufacturing because you think it is important for children to have an opportunity to go to school and play. Laws in the United States regulate child labor, but some countries allow it. In some situations around the world, a family depends on the child's earnings to be able to afford to eat. From the perspective of egoism, utilitarianism, duty-based ethics, and virtue ethics, answer the following questions and give reasons for your answers based on those ethical theories. Would you buy competitively-priced products if you knew that the low prices came from savings in manufacturing costs based on paying low wages to children in poor countries? If you learned that your employer manufactured, distributed, or sold products made using child labor, would you keep working there, if you were depending on your job to feed and clothe your own child? Would you advocate closing factories that use child labor, even if the result would be that the jobless children and their families would go hungry?

Paper For Above instruction

The exploration of ethical considerations surrounding insider trading and child labor provides a comprehensive view of how different ethical frameworks interpret complex moral issues. This paper examines two case scenarios through the lenses of egoism, utilitarianism, duty-based ethics, and virtue ethics to analyze the moral dimensions and implications of each situation.

Case Scenario 1: Martha Stewart and Insider Trading

Insider trading, the buying or selling of stocks based on non-public, material information, is a contentious issue in financial ethics. From an egoist perspective, insider trading may be justified if it benefits the individual trader. Egoism prioritizes personal interest above societal rules, implying that Martha Stewart's actions could be seen as ethically permissible if she gained financially. However, from a utilitarian perspective, insider trading can be harmful to market integrity and investor trust, leading to greater societal harm than individual gain. Thus, it would generally be considered unethical due to its negative impact on the overall well-being of market participants.

Duty-based ethics (deontology) focus on adherence to moral rules and duties. From this perspective, passing along insider tips violates duties of honesty and fairness, rendering the act unethical regardless of legality. Virtue ethics emphasizes moral character; honesty and integrity are virtues that insider trading compromises. Martha Stewart’s decision to trade stocks based on insider information exemplifies a lack of virtues valued in ethical conduct.

Regarding the legality of insider trading, many argue that legality correlates with morality; however, critics contend that some illegal practices may not be inherently unethical. Nevertheless, in this case, the combination of legal breach and ethical violations highlights the complex interplay between law and morality. Stewart’s actions betrayed trust and breached moral duties, making her conduct ethically problematic across all frameworks.

Case Scenario 2: Child Labor and Ethical Responsibility

Child labor raises profound ethical questions about the rights of children and economic survival. An egoist might justify using child labor if it benefits the individual or family, especially in poverty-stricken contexts. However, from a utilitarian viewpoint, employing child labor is ethically problematic if it results in harm—such as depriving children of education and exposing them to hazardous work—thereby reducing overall societal welfare.

Duty-based ethics condemn child labor because it violates moral duties to protect the innocent, uphold human rights, and promote justice. From this perspective, exploiting children contradicts the moral obligation to treat individuals with respect and dignity. Virtue ethics would emphasize qualities like compassion, justice, and moral integrity; supporting child labor would be inconsistent with these virtues, especially given the potential harm to children's futures and well-being.

When considering whether to buy products made with child labor, an ethical consumer might experience conflict. While low prices benefit the consumer and economy, they often come at the expense of vulnerable children’s rights. Ethically, supporting such products perpetuates the cycle of exploitation, violating the moral duties to promote justice and protect innocence.

Similarly, if an individual depends on a job that involves child labor, virtue ethics would raise concerns about personal integrity and social responsibility. Staying employed in such a scenario could be morally questionable if it tacitly endorses unethical practices. Conversely, abandoning a vital source of income could exacerbate family hardship, which presents a moral dilemma balancing immediate needs with ethical ideals.

Advocacy for closing factories that use child labor hinges on weighing the rights of exploited children against economic stability. Ethically, many argue that eliminating such practices aligns with responsibilities to uphold human rights and promote global justice, even if it causes short-term hardship for vulnerable families.

Conclusion

Both case scenarios highlight the importance of considering multiple ethical perspectives when evaluating morally complex issues. While legal standards serve as guidelines, ethical principles derived from egoism, utilitarianism, duty-based ethics, and virtue ethics provide deeper insights into the moral responsibilities of individuals and organizations. Ultimately, these frameworks suggest that considerations of fairness, harm, virtue, and duty must inform decisions that impact others’ well-being and rights.

References

• Bowie, N. E. (2017). Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
• MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
• Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press.
• Singh, J., & Sharma, V. (2018). Child Labor and Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 323-338.
• Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View. Oxford University Press.
• Thompson, P., & McGregor, M. (2016). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Väyrynen, O. (2016). The Moral Dimensions of Insider Trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 239–253.
• Werhane, P. H., & Kline, S. (2004). Child Labour, Ethical Business, and Global Commerce. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 15-25.