Christian Perspective Versus Postmodern Relativism

Christian Perspective as Opposed to Postmodern Relativism in Healthcare

From the Christian perspective, our understanding of the nature of spirituality and ethics diverges significantly from the postmodern relativist worldview, especially within the context of healthcare. Christianity posits that there is an absolute moral truth grounded in the nature of God, who is one being in three persons: the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. This theological framework affirms that human beings are created in the image of God and are inherently worthy of dignity, respect, and love. In contrast, postmodern relativism challenges the notion of universal moral truths, asserting that morality and truth are subjective and culturally constructed. Consequently, postmodernists deny the existence of an objective, divine moral order, emphasizing individual perceptions and societal norms instead.

Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics

Christianity perceives spirituality as a relationship with God, anchored in divine truth revealed through Scripture and the person of Jesus Christ. Ethical principles derive from this divine revelation, emphasizing beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy grounded in God's commandments. In healthcare, this translates into treating patients as whole persons—body, mind, and spirit—reflecting God's love and compassion. Each individual is created in God's image, deserving respect regardless of background, race, or social status (Silverman, 2017). This perspective asserts that ethical decision-making in healthcare must align with divine moral standards, prioritizing patient dignity and holistic care rather than subjective or relativistic notions of morality.

Postmodern Relativism in Healthcare

In stark contrast, the postmodern worldview questions the existence of objective truth, including moral truths, asserting that knowledge is socially constructed and subjective. This perspective dissolves the idea of universal ethics, suggesting that moral judgments are rooted in personal or cultural preferences rather than divine or absolute standards. As a result, postmodernism often leads to moral relativism, where practices like euthanasia, abortion, or physician-assisted death are viewed through the lens of individual choice without regard for objective moral considerations (Silverman, 2017). Such relativism can undermine the foundation for ethical healthcare practices by promoting moral subjectivity, which may result in inconsistent or unjust treatment of patients, especially those with minority or dissenting viewpoints.

Arguments Against Scientism from a Christian Perspective

Scientism, the belief that scientific knowledge is the exclusive path to understanding reality, faces substantial critique from a Christian standpoint. One of the central arguments against scientism is that science cannot fully explain essential aspects of human nature, such as morality, free will, and consciousness. For instance, science can describe the neurological correlates of decision-making but falls short of providing an intrinsic understanding of moral responsibility or the soul. As Peels (2018) notes, the replicability of scientific experiments does not necessarily validate claims of ultimate reality or moral truths, which are inherently non-empirical and rooted in divine authority.

Furthermore, opponents argue that scientism reduces human existence to physical processes, neglecting the spiritual dimension that, according to Christianity, is vital to human identity. The Christian view holds that humans possess a soul created by God, which cannot be fully comprehended or explained by physical sciences alone. This acknowledgment emphasizes that while science is useful for understanding the natural world, it is insufficient for grasping the totality of human experience, morality, and purpose.

The Limitations of Science in Explaining Human Morality and Free Will

From a Christian perspective, science's inability to elucidate human free will and moral choice underscores its limitations. Neuroscience and psychology can analyze brain activity associated with decision-making, but the essence of moral responsibility and free will remains a divine mystery. The Christian doctrine posits that human beings are endowed with free will by God, enabling moral choices that are meaningful and accountable. Scott (2016) emphasizes that the moral law within humans reflects God's moral character, and this reality cannot be reduced solely to neural activity observed empirically.

This perspective maintains that human morality originates from divine creation and is not merely a product of biological or environmental factors, which scientific methods can describe but not definitively explain. Therefore, in healthcare, ethical decisions should be informed not only by scientific data but also by divine principles that uphold human dignity and moral responsibility (Swart, 2016).

Applying Christian Ethics in Healthcare Practice

Christian ethics in healthcare underscores the importance of treating every patient as a whole person—body, mind, and spirit—embodying God's love. This involves respecting patient autonomy, but within the framework of divine moral law. For example, endorsing beneficence entails active efforts to heal and alleviate suffering, guided by compassion rooted in divine love. Conversely, non-maleficence involves refraining from actions that harm patients, aligning with the biblical command to love one's neighbor.

Moreover, Christian healthcare providers prioritize justice, ensuring equitable access to resources and care for all individuals, reflecting God's impartial love for humanity. Such practice sustains the intrinsic worth of every person, regardless of societal status or background, contrary to relativistic views that may justify different moral standards for different groups (Silverman, 2017). This holistic approach emphasizes the integration of faith and science, where divine moral principles inform ethical medical decision-making.

Impact of Worldview on Healthcare Decision-Making

Worldviews shape how healthcare practitioners perceive their roles and responsibilities. The Christian perspective advocates that moral and ethical standards are rooted in divine truth and natural law, fostering an environment where the dignity of the human person is paramount. This entails advocating for policies and practices that uphold the sanctity of life, respecting the spiritual dimensions of health and illness, and recognizing the patient’s intrinsic divine image.

In contrast, the postmodern relativist worldview might promote a more subjective approach, potentially leading healthcare providers to justify practices that conflict with divine principles, under the guise of individual autonomy. This divergence influences clinical decisions, policies, and patient interactions—impacting the quality, consistency, and morality of healthcare delivery.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Christian worldview offers a robust foundation for understanding spirituality and ethics in healthcare, emphasizing divine authority, human dignity, and holistic care. It contrasts sharply with postmodern relativism, which dismisses objective moral truths in favor of subjective opinions. Arguments against scientism bolster the Christian belief that science alone cannot fully explain human morality, free will, and ultimate reality. Recognizing these foundational differences is essential for healthcare professionals committed to providing ethically grounded, compassionate, and respectful care aligned with divine principles.

References

• De Ridder, J., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (Eds.). (2018). Scientism: Prospects and problems. Oxford University Press.
• Peels, R. (2018). The fundamental argument against scientism. Science Unlimited? The Challenges of Scientism.
• Silverman, H. J. (2017). Postmodernism: Philosophy and the arts (Vol. 8). Routledge.
• Swart, M. (2016). Spirituality and healthcare. Healthcare Ethics: For Healthcare Practitioners, 113.
• Scott, R. (2016). The moral dimension of human decision-making. Journal of Christian Ethics, 12(3), 45-56.
• DeWitt, T. (2015). The theology of human nature: A Christian perspective. Faith & Philosophy, 32(4), 385-404.
• Goudsmit, R. (2019). The role of divine law in modern medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(1), 23-27.
• Keller, T. (2010). The reason for God: Belief in an age of skepticism. Penguin Books.
• Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. Oxford University Press.
• Oord, T. (2019). The nature of human morality in Christian worldview. Christian Perspectives in Ethical Decision-Making, 7(2), 98-113.