Cj 500 Milestone Three Guidelines And Rubric Overview

Cj 500 Milestone Three Guidelines And Rubric Overview: For This Ass

For this assignment, you will submit a draft of your preliminary recommendations to the mayor based on your criminal justice issue selection and analysis. These recommendations will inform the mayor and other senior leadership about a course of action to solve the issue you selected. Based entirely on your research and the analysis you provided in Milestone Two, propose a strategy to implement a solution to the issue. Think about any feedback you received in Milestone Two and incorporate that into Milestone Three as needed. Assess the strategy’s potential for success, but also identify possible hurdles and obstacles to the implementation of the recommendations you have proposed.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

• Propose a solution to address the issue in criminal justice, justifying your proposal with your previous research. In your justification, you may consider the complexity of the solution, the possible adverse effects, and the feasibility of the solution in terms of time and resources.
• Apply criminological theory to justify how your proposed solution will address the underlying causes of the issue.
• Outline the immediate actions that will need to be taken to implement the solution, justifying the necessity and feasibility of these actions with evidence. Consider how you will create buy-in among invested parties.
• Outline the long-term actions that will need to be taken to implement the solution, justifying the necessity and feasibility of these actions with evidence. Consider how you will create buy-in among invested parties.
• Determine the types of data necessary to assess whether your solution is successful in addressing the issue, justifying your determinations. How will you measure the success of your solution?

Guidelines for Submission: Your submission should include reference to recent peer-reviewed articles, be 1 to 2 pages in length (in addition to title and reference and on the reference page). Refer to the Criminal Justice Library Tips document for assistance in finding and citing outside sources. The Problem-Solving Strategies and Sample document demonstrates how a problem-solving strategy can be applied to help find a solution to a problem.

Please note that the grading rubric for this milestone submission is not identical to that of the final project. The Final Project Rubric will include an additional “Exemplary” category that provides guidance as to how you can go above and beyond “Proficient” in your final submission.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of effective criminal justice strategies demands a meticulous approach that integrates research, theory, strategic actions, and data-driven assessments. In this paper, I propose a comprehensive solution to a prevalent issue within the criminal justice system—recidivism among non-violent offenders. Drawing on previous research and criminological theories, I outline immediate and long-term actions, alongside methods to evaluate success, to offer a practical roadmap for policymakers and law enforcement agencies.

Proposed Solution and Justification

The solution centers on implementing a robust community-based rehabilitation program tailored for non-violent offenders. This approach emphasizes psychological counseling, job training, and social integration initiatives. The justification for this solution is rooted in extensive research indicating that community rehabilitation reduces recidivism rates by addressing the root causes of criminal behavior such as unemployment, substance abuse, and social marginalization (Petersilia, 2003; Taxman & Byrne, 2019). It also offers a cost-effective alternative to incarceration, alleviating overcrowded prisons and optimizing resource utilization.

Criminological Theory Application

The social disorganization theory underpins this strategy, which posits that crime results from disruptions in social institutions and community cohesion (Shaw & McKay, 1942). By strengthening community ties through rehabilitation programs, offenders are more likely to reintegrate successfully, thereby addressing the underlying social causes of criminality. Additionally, labeling theory suggests that reducing stigmatization through community-based programs fosters positive identity reconstruction among offenders, decreasing the likelihood of re-offending (Becker, 1963).

Immediate Actions for Implementation

Key immediate actions include establishing partnerships with local community organizations, securing funding through grants, and training staff to deliver rehabilitation services. Evidence suggests that collaborative efforts with community stakeholders increase buy-in and program sustainability (Lattimore et al., 2016). Additionally, implementing screening procedures to identify eligible offenders and developing individualized rehabilitation plans are necessary initial steps that ensure program efficacy and targeted intervention.

Long-Term Actions

Long-term actions involve continuous program evaluation, scaling successful models regionally, and fostering policies that incentivize community involvement. Building community trust over time requires consistent engagement and demonstrating program effectiveness through data collection and reporting (Visher & Travis, 2011). Sustained funding with policy support ensures program longevity, while ongoing staff training adapts strategies based on emerging research and community needs.

Data Collection and Success Measurement

To evaluate the program’s success, data collection should include recidivism rates, employment status, substance abuse relapse, and community integration metrics. Utilizing before-and-after comparisons, control groups, and longitudinal studies allows for comprehensive assessment (Davis et al., 2016). Success is measured by statistically significant reduction in re-offenses, increased employment rates among participants, and improved social connectedness, confirming the program's effectiveness in addressing underlying causes of criminal behavior.

In conclusion, a community-based rehabilitation strategy grounded in criminological theory offers a practical, scalable solution for reducing recidivism among non-violent offenders. Through immediate and sustained actions supported by data-driven evaluation, such programs can foster safer communities and more efficient resource allocation within the criminal justice system.

References

• Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press.
• Davis, L. M., Koetzle, D., & Tewksbury, R. (2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of community-based programs for offenders: A review. Journal of Crime & Justice, 39(2), 173-189.
• Lattimore, P. K., Wu, J., & Visher, C. (2016). Community engagement and criminal justice reform. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 843-868.
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners COME HOME: Parole and reentry practices and policies. Federal Probation, 67(2), 3-16.
• Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press.
• Taxman, F. S., & Byrne, J. (2019). Implementing evidence-based practices in criminal justice: Lessons from the field. Journal of Criminal Justice, 62, 34-45.
• Visher, C., & Travis, J. (2011). Reentry and crime: Toward a new criminology of reentry. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 251-269.