Class Participation: Only Need 8 Responses

Class Participation Only Need 8 Responses Each Response Only 120 Wor

Class participation requires a total of 8 responses, each consisting of approximately 120 words. Responses should be directly targeted to the post being replied to, with the reply text formatted in red font. The responses do not need to be formal papers but should function as part of a class discussion. At least one response must be submitted by Saturday, with the remaining responses due by Sunday or Monday. It is acceptable to post all responses on Monday as long as at least one is posted each day across Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. The key is to ensure responses are evenly spread out over the three days, facilitating ongoing engagement and participation in the class discussion.

Paper For Above instruction

During this week’s class participation assignment, the focus is on active engagement through eight targeted responses. Each response, limited to approximately 120 words, must directly address the post being replied to, fostering meaningful dialogue and critical thinking. The requirement to format responses in red font emphasizes clarity and visibility in the discussion board. Flexibility in posting times allows students to distribute their responses across three days—Saturday through Monday—thus encouraging consistent engagement without overwhelming a single day. This approach not only promotes regular participation but also enhances collective learning by maintaining ongoing conversations. The strategy supports a dynamic learning environment where timely contributions are valued, and students are encouraged to reflect thoughtfully on their peers’ posts, strengthening understanding of the course material through continuous interaction.

References

1. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
2. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance Education: A Systems View. Cengage Learning.
3. Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University Press.
4. Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building Sense of Community Online: A Review of the Literature. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 141-162.
5. Salmon, G. (2013). E-moderating: The Key to Online Teaching and Learning. Routledge.
6. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning Presence: Towards a Theory of Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulation, and the Development of a Community of Inquiry in Online Education. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 174-182.
7. Means, B., et al. (2014). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. U.S. Department of Education.
8. Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. Routledge.
9. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.
10. Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). US Faculty and Administrators’ Experiences with Emergency Remote Teaching During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6-21.