Clearly Identifying The Independent And Dependent Variables

Clearly identifying the independent and dependent variables in a study is a critical aspect of any research project

In a study investigating the effects of humor on memory, Schmidt (1994) showed participants a list of sentences, half of which were humorous and half were non-humorous. Schmidt found that participants consistently recalled more of the humorous sentences than the non-humorous sentences, demonstrating that the use of humor increased participants’ recall of sentences.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of identifying variables is fundamental in conducting and understanding research. The independent variable is the factor that the researcher manipulates or varies to observe its effect on the dependent variable, which is the outcome or response affected by the independent variable. A clear understanding of these variables and their measurement scales is crucial for designing, analyzing, and interpreting research studies effectively.

In the context of Schmidt’s (1994) study, the independent variable is the type of sentence presented—humorous or non-humorous. This variable was manipulated by showing participants different types of sentences to assess whether humor influences memory recall. The scale of measurement for this independent variable is nominal because the sentences are categorized into two distinct groups: humorous and non-humorous. Nominal measurement involves classification without any inherent order, which is appropriate since the sentences are simply classified into categories based on their humor content, with no ranking or quantitative value assigned.

The dependent variable in Schmidt’s study is the number of sentences correctly recalled by participants. This outcome measure reflects memory performance and is a direct response to the independent variable. The scale of measurement for the dependent variable is ratio, as the number of recalled sentences is a quantitative measure with a true zero point and equal intervals, allowing for meaningful comparisons of recall performance.

Constructing a similar study using Schmidt’s approach requires defining a clear purpose and selecting appropriate variables. For example, suppose we want to examine how the time of day affects memory recall. The purpose of this hypothetical study could be to investigate whether memory performance varies between morning and afternoon sessions. The research question might be: “Does the time of day influence individuals’ memory recall?”

The independent variable in this new study would be the time of day, with two levels—morning and afternoon—thus being a nominal variable measured on a categorical scale. The dependent variable would be the number of words or sentences recalled, again measured on a ratio scale, as it involves quantifiable, numerical data. This design would enable an analysis of whether session timing impacts memory performance, paralleling Schmidt’s methodology but exploring a different contextual factor.

The purpose of the research is to determine if environmental or temporal factors influence cognitive performance, specifically memory recall. The research question focuses on assessing the effect of the independent variable (time of day) on the dependent variable (recall performance). Understanding and accurately identifying these variables, along with their measurement scales, allows researchers to choose appropriate statistical tests and draw valid conclusions from their data.

In conclusion, clear identification of independent and dependent variables, along with their measurement scales, is essential for research clarity and validity. Schmidt’s (1994) study exemplifies this by manipulating the type of sentence and measuring recall performance. Similarly, other studies can adapt this structure to explore different factors affecting cognitive functions, ensuring precise operational definitions and measurement. This foundational step supports rigorous scientific inquiry, facilitating the development of evidence-based knowledge across psychological and behavioral sciences.

References

• Schmidt, S. (1994). The effects of humor on memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 120(2), 113-122.
• Cohen, J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurements. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Levine, T. R. (2018). The scales of measurement in research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 19(3), 262-271.
• Vogt, W. P. (2011). Dictionary of statistics & methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Sage Publications.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
• Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson.
• Babbie, E. (2015). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.
• Morling, B. (2017). Research methods in psychology. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Myers, D. G. (2014). Psychology. Worth Publishers.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning.