Click The Attachment To Access The Research Evaluation Check

Click The Attachment Toaccess The Research Evaluation Checklistusing

Click the attachment to access the research evaluation checklist. Using this checklist, read and evaluate the article “Diagnosed with Breast Cancer While on a Family History Screening Programme: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.” (In case you can't access the file, I have attached it also named PDF file). Enter your responses in the document. Use and properly cite sources using the APA format.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The research evaluation process is a critical aspect of assessing the validity, reliability, and overall quality of scholarly articles. It ensures that the research contributes meaningful knowledge to the field, adheres to academic standards, and employs appropriate methodologies. The article titled “Diagnosed with Breast Cancer While on a Family History Screening Programme: An Exploratory Qualitative Study” offers insights into the experiences of women diagnosed with breast cancer within a specific screening context. This paper aims to evaluate this article using a structured research evaluation checklist, considering aspects such as research design, methodology, credibility, relevance, and ethical considerations.

Research Objectives and Rationale

The article's primary objective is to explore the experiences of women diagnosed with breast cancer during a family history screening programme. The rationale behind the study is grounded in identifying emotional, psychological, and social impacts, which can inform future screening protocols and support services. A clear articulation of research objectives aligns with the standards of qualitative research, emphasizing an explorative approach to understanding personal experiences (Creswell, 2014). The study fills a gap in existing literature regarding patient perspectives in screening contexts, making it relevant and timely.

Research Design and Methodology

The study employs a qualitative, exploratory research design, appropriate for understanding nuanced personal experiences (Silverman, 2016). The authors used semi-structured interviews, enabling participants to share their stories in depth. The sampling strategy involved purposive sampling, selecting women diagnosed within the screening program, which ensures relevance but limits generalizability (Patton, 2015). Data collection was conducted ethically with informed consent, and interviews were transcribed verbatim, enhancing data authenticity. Thematic analysis was employed to interpret the data, following established qualitative procedures (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The methodology's transparency and adherence to qualitative standards support the study’s validity and reliability.

Data Analysis and Results

The thematic analysis identified core themes, including emotional distress, perceptions of screening efficacy, and the need for tailored support. The authors provided detailed descriptions, supporting quotes, and categories that bolster credibility (Nowell et al., 2017). The findings offer valuable insights into patient experiences, reflecting the depth and richness expected of qualitative research. The analysis was rigorous, with multiple coders cross-validating themes, ensuring dependability. However, limited demographic data restricts understanding of how diverse backgrounds might influence experiences.

Ethical Considerations

The researchers obtained ethical approval from a relevant institutional review board, and participants provided informed consent, respecting confidentiality and voluntary participation (Resnik, 2018). Anonymity was maintained throughout the research process. Ethical rigor supports the credibility and integrity of the research, adhering to accepted ethical standards in qualitative research.

Relevance and Contribution to Field

This study contributes to breast cancer screening literature by emphasizing patient perspectives, which are often underrepresented. The insights can guide policy changes to improve screening protocols, emotional support, and patient-centered care. Its qualitative nature enriches understanding beyond quantitative metrics, attuning healthcare providers to emotional and psychological needs during screening processes (Paterson, 2016). The findings are particularly relevant for clinicians, policymakers, and patient advocacy groups aiming to enhance supportive care services.

Limitations and Biases

The study’s limitations include a small, purposively sampled group from a single geographic area, which could introduce selection bias and limit the transferability of findings (Polit & Beck, 2017). Furthermore, self-reported data may be subject to recall bias or social desirability bias. The authors acknowledged these limitations and suggested future research with larger, more diverse populations to validate findings.

Conclusion

Overall, the article demonstrates sound qualitative research practices, with clear articulation of objectives, appropriate methodology, and credible data analysis. Ethical considerations were thoroughly addressed. While limitations exist, the study contributes valuable insights into the emotional and psychological experiences of women diagnosed during breast cancer screening, underscoring the importance of integrating patient perspectives into screening programs. Using the research evaluation checklist enhances the critical assessment of the study’s strengths and weaknesses, affirming its contribution to healthcare research.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Paterson, B. (2016). Qualitative health research: Developing theory, shaping practice. Nursing Inquiry, 23(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12081

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Resnik, D. B. (2018). Ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(4), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1424684

Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage Publications.