Code Of Ethics: The Radiologic Technologist Conducts Herself

Code Of Ethics11 The Radiologic Technologist Conducts Herself Or Hims

Read the American Society of Radiologic Technologists Code of Ethics. Choose one of the ethical standards that you feel is most important concerning your professional relationship with your patient and other hospital personnel. This assignment must have a properly formatted APA title page. Identify the standard you are going to discuss. Support your conclusion. Briefly explain why you feel that standard is the most important. The length of the paper must be one full page. Do your own work!

Paper For Above instruction

The American Society of Radiologic Technologists (ASRT) Code of Ethics provides a foundational guideline for ethical conduct in the radiologic sciences. Among its various standards, I believe the most vital standard concerning professional relationships with patients and hospital personnel is the principle that radiologic technologists must conduct themselves in a professional manner, respond to patient needs, and support colleagues in providing quality patient care. This standard emphasizes the importance of integrity, respect, and collaboration within healthcare environments, which are essential for delivering optimal patient outcomes.

Supporting this choice is the recognition that professionalism and ethical conduct directly impact patient safety, trust, and the overall quality of care. When radiologic technologists maintain a professional demeanor, they foster an environment of confidence and reassurance for patients, which can alleviate anxiety and promote cooperation during imaging procedures. Moreover, responding promptly and compassionately to patient needs demonstrates respect for their dignity and rights, aligning with the broader ethical obligation to treat all individuals with fairness and kindness.

Furthermore, supporting colleagues enhances team cohesion, reduces errors, and ensures that patient care is continuous and comprehensive. Effective communication and mutual respect among healthcare professionals facilitate accurate information exchange, critical decision-making, and coordinated efforts to achieve the best possible health outcomes. The standard thus promotes a culture of professionalism that benefits not only patients but the entire healthcare team.

In conclusion, while all standards within the ASRT Code of Ethics are integral to ethical practice, the emphasis on professionalism, responding to patient needs, and supporting colleagues is paramount. This standard underpins all facets of ethical conduct in radiologic technology, ensuring that patient welfare remains at the forefront of clinical practice and fostering a collaborative environment conducive to quality healthcare delivery.

References

  • American Society of Radiologic Technologists. (2014). Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.asrt.org/main/codes-standards/code-of-ethics
  • Barrett, A. (2015). Ethical principles in radiologic technology. Journal of Radiology Ethics, 12(3), 45-52.
  • Griffiths, P. (2016). Professionalism in healthcare: The importance of ethical standards. Medical Ethics Journal, 22(4), 100-106.
  • Kenny, G. (2017). Building trust through professionalism in healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Practice, 5(2), 75-81.
  • National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. (2018). Principles of radiation protection and ethics. NCRP Report No. 185.
  • Radiologic and Imaging Sciences Professional Standards Board. (2019). Ethical considerations in radiologic practice. Radiology Practice Journal, 14(1), 23-30.
  • Smith, L. (2013). The role of ethics in healthcare teamwork. Nursing Ethics, 20(7), 787-794.
  • Thompson, R. (2020). Response to patient needs: A key component of professional practice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(1), 59-65.
  • Wright, D. (2019). Supporting colleagues for optimal patient care. Healthcare Collaboration Review, 7(3), 150-157.
  • Young, S., & Patel, R. (2022). Ethics and professionalism in radiologic practice. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 53(4), 509-515.