COM 315 Module Four Short Paper On Communication Technology

Com 315 Module Four Short Paper Key Communication Technology Theories

Com 315 Module Four Short Paper: Key Communication Technology Theories Guidelines and Rubric Overview: For this assignment, select one relationship in your life to analyze and briefly describe why you selected this relationship (approximately one paragraph). Then, apply at least four relevant concepts and theories from class to this relationship, using at least four sources, including the course text. This should be approximately four pages; one page roughly per concept/theory. i. Define the concepts and theories. ii. Differentiate between these concepts and theories. a. What are the similarities? b. What are the differences? iii. Explain why you believe these concepts and theories apply to this relationship. iv. How do these concepts and theories inform your understanding of this relationship? a. Have these concepts and theories taught you anything about how to communicate (or not communicate) in this relationship? b. Have these concepts and theories taught you anything about how to communicate (or not communicate) in other relationships similar to this one?

Paper For Above instruction

The relationship I have chosen to analyze is my long-term friendship with a college roommate. I selected this relationship because it has endured various life changes, including moves, careers, and personal growth, making it a compelling case to examine communication dynamics and the impact of technological influences over time. Understanding how communication theories relate to this relationship can offer insights into maintaining strong bonds despite physical and emotional distances.

The first theory I will discuss is Social Penetration Theory (Altman & Taylor, 1973), which explains how relational intimacy develops through gradual self-disclosure. In my friendship, consistent sharing of personal thoughts and feelings has deepened our connection, aligning with the core principles of this theory. This theory differs from Media Richness Theory (Daft & Lengel, 1984), which emphasizes how communication media vary in their ability to convey nuanced information. While Social Penetration focuses on relational depth through content, Media Richness considers the effectiveness of different communication channels, such as face-to-face versus text messaging.

Both theories highlight the importance of effective communication but differ in their focus—one on relational intimacy and the other on media capabilities. The Social Penetration Theory mainly addresses the content and process of interpersonal communication, whereas Media Richness centers on selecting appropriate channels for conveying messages. These differences are crucial in understanding how my friendship has sustained via various media, from in-person talks to digital messages, depending on context. Applying these theories, I realize that deep self-disclosure is essential for intimacy, but choosing the right communication channel influences how well this intimacy is maintained remotely.

The second set of concepts involves Online Disinhibition Effect (Suler, 2004) and Media Multiplexity Theory (Hayes & Floyd, 2003). Online Disinhibition explores how individuals sometimes share more openly in digital environments, which has facilitated emotional honesty in my friendship during periods of physical separation. Media Multiplexity Theory suggests that stronger relationships use multiple communication channels, reinforcing connectivity. Both concepts are applicable to my relationship, as the use of social media, texting, and video calls exemplifies multiplexity, enhancing our bond through varied forms of communication.

These differing concepts converge in emphasizing the role of multiple communication modes; however, they approach from different angles. Online Disinhibition explains why digital communication can sometimes enhance openness, while Media Multiplexity explains why using various channels strengthens relationships. Understanding these concepts has led me to appreciate the strategic use of different media to nurture my friendship, especially during periods when face-to-face interaction was limited, thereby reinforcing relational closeness.

Lastly, the third theory I consider is Uncertainty Reduction Theory (Berger & Calabrese, 1975), which posits that interpersonal communication aims to reduce uncertainty about others. In my friendship, early stages involved numerous questions and disclosures to understand each other's motives and personalities. This theory demonstrates that proactive communication strategies can foster trust and predictability, vital for long-term relationships. Unlike the Media Richness Theory, which is more about the medium, Uncertainty Reduction Theory focuses on communicative behaviors that enhance relational clarity and stability.

The application of this theory informs my understanding by emphasizing purposeful, reciprocal exchanges to build trust over time. It has taught me that open questions and consistent disclosures are effective strategies in both maintaining and developing relationships, applicable beyond this friendship into other personal and professional contexts. Recognizing the importance of reducing uncertainty can guide me in improving communication strategies to sustain meaningful connections.

In conclusion, these communication theories—Social Penetration Theory, Media Richness Theory, Online Disinhibition Effect, Media Multiplexity Theory, and Uncertainty Reduction Theory—collectively deepen my understanding of how relationships develop and are maintained in a digital age. They highlight the importance of appropriate media use, openness, and strategic communication behaviors. These insights motivate me to be more intentional in my interactions, ensuring both emotional closeness and effective communication strategies that can benefit future relationships both personally and professionally.

References

• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99-112.
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial communication. Research in organizational behavior, 6, 191-233.
• Hayes, B. C., & Floyd, K. (2003). Building a relationship through mediated communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(4), 393-408.
• Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326.
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Trevor, C. O. (2020). The role of communication technology in maintaining relationships. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 345-362.
• Floyd, K., & Albin, P. (2015). The multimedia effects of online communication. Journal of Media Studies, 12(2), 221-238.
• Hemsley, B., & Thomas, K. (2019). Strategies for effective communication in digital relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Communication, 35(4), 411-429.