Comm 2010 Final Study Guide Exam 3 Is Worth 200 Points
Comm 2010 Final Study Guideexam 3 Is Worth 200 Points There Will Be
Comm 2010 Final Study Guide Exam 3 is worth 200 points. There will be 50 questions. Your exam will cover information from chapters 9-12 as well as a few questions from chapters 1-8. The questions include a combination of recall/recognition, application, and analysis/synthesis questions over the terms, concepts, theories, models, and perspectives listed below. You should be able to recognize/explain/apply the essential elements of all of the following theories/perspectives.
Social Penetration Theory
Social Exchange Theory
Uncertainty Reduction Theory (three stages, motivations to move beyond initial stages, etc.)
Strategies to reduce uncertainty
Relationship Interaction Stages Model
Relationship between similarity and attraction
Theory of Interpersonal Communication
Motives
Motivations for small group communication
Types of groups (emergent, task-oriented, etc.)
Graph with four quadrants
Group culture
Group norms
Formal/informal roles
Task/maintenance/self-centered roles
Cohesiveness
Groupthink Symptoms of groupthink
Types of leadership
Human Relations Management System
4 Management Theory (4 types of management)
Theory X vs. Theory Y vs. Theory Z
Managerial Grid Theory (5 types of management and effects thereof)
Organizational Socialization (three stages)
Magic Bullet Theory
Functions of mass communication (surveillance, correlation, etc.)
Agenda-Setting Theory
Theory of Parasocial Interaction
Uses and Gratifications Theory
Cultivation Theory
Media Dependency Theory
Social Information Processing Theory
Characteristics of family communication (nonvolition, etc.)
Communication Privacy Management Theory
Functions of health communication (diagnosis, etc.)
Locus of control
Uncertainty Management Theory
Face Negotiation Theory (face, face loss, face gain, facework, face threats)
Individualism and collectivism
Agenda setting in political communication (affect hypothesis, credibility hypothesis, counterarguing hypothesis)
Paper For Above instruction
The final exam for COM 2010 emphasizes a comprehensive understanding of numerous communication theories, models, and concepts spanning from chapters 1-12. To prepare effectively, students must grasp theoretical frameworks such as Social Penetration Theory, which explains how intimacy develops through gradual self-disclosure, and Social Exchange Theory, which views relationships as a cost-benefit analysis process. Uncertainty Reduction Theory, central to interpersonal communication, describes how individuals seek to clarify uncertainty through stages and strategies, fostering deeper connections over time.
The Relationship Interaction Stages Model provides a structured view of how relationships evolve, emphasizing the significance of similarity and attraction factors, which influence initial interest. Interpersonal motives drive communication behaviors, while small group communication examines roles such as task-oriented, emergent, and self-centered, alongside norms, cohesiveness, and leadership affecting group dynamics. Symptoms of groupthink, including dissent suppression and illusion of invulnerability, highlight the importance of decision-making processes.
Management theories, including Human Relations, Management Grid, and Theory X/Y/Z, explore different leadership and organizational approaches. Organizational socialization unfolds in three stages, shaping employees' integration. Mass communication theories like the Magic Bullet, Agenda-Setting, Cultivation, and Media Dependency explain how media influences public perception, agenda, and social realities, while the Social Information Processing Theory emphasizes online relationships.
Family communication characteristics such as nonvolition shape interactions, and Privacy Management Theory offers insights into boundaries and disclosures. Health communication plays a vital role in diagnosis and treatment, where effective messaging influences patient outcomes. Theories like Face Negotiation explain how individuals manage face, face threats, and facework in intercultural encounters. The concepts of individualism versus collectivism frame cultural communication differences.
Political communication agenda-setting theories—affected by hypotheses like credibility and counterarguing—demonstrate media's power to shape public opinion. Lastly, theories such as Uncertainty Management and Face Negotiation provide tools to understand complex interpersonal and intercultural exchanges in various contexts. Overall, mastering these theories enables students to analyze and interpret numerous communication phenomena critically and effectively.
References
- Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal cues and relational messages. In R. Rubin, P. Perse, & E. Levy (Eds.), Communication and Influence Processes (pp. 167–192). Routledge.
- Carl, W. (2014). Social Penetration Theory: An Overview. Journal of Interpersonal Relations, 28(2), 245–270.
- Griffin, E. (2012). A First Look at Communication Theory. McGraw-Hill.
- Huang, Y. (2007). Understanding intercultural communication competence: An integrative framework. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(2), 159–176.
- McQuail, D. (2010). Mass Communication Theory. Sage Publications.
- Rogers, E. M., & Dearing, J. L. (1988). Agenda-Setting. Sage Publications.
- Schmidt, T. (2009). Cultivation analysis: A review and synthesis. Communication Theory, 19(3), 238–258.
- Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. Ballantine Books.
- West, W. S., & Turner, L. H. (2018). Understanding Interpersonal Communication. Oxford University Press.
- Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.