Commentary 2: Discussing Crows And Sparrows Only

Commentary 2 Is To Discuss Crows And Sparrows Only No Other Filmsma

Commentary 2 is to discuss “Crows and Sparrows” only, no other films. Make sure you have a clear argument or statement: find a focus to organize your writing. A general plot or characterization summary earns little credit. Analyze the film in detail, including elements such as mise-en-scène, facial expressions (e.g., smiles), camera angles, and other cinematic techniques. Rephrase key words for better connection between theoretical reading and your film analysis, such as metaphor, allegory, and realism. For example, connect the thematic elements of the film to these concepts in your analysis.

When incorporating readings, always use the assigned reading from the same week as the film under discussion. The same approach applies for commentaries 2-3. You only need to quote from one reading per commentary; do not include multiple quotes. Ensure the quote is relevant to your analysis, and avoid lengthy quotations. Focus on discussing a single idea thoroughly within the space available.

Proofread your commentary carefully to improve clarity, coherence, and grammatical accuracy before submission. You do not need a separate Works Cited page; instead, include in-text citations (e.g., Harris, p. #). Cite only the chapter author (e.g., Harris), not the editor of the volume (e.g., Berry). Maintain focus on in-depth analysis rather than summary or general description, emphasizing detailed cinematic analysis and theoretical connections.

Additionally, include one relevant quote from the assigned weekly reading that supports your analysis, ensuring it enhances the connection between theory and film critique. The link to the film should be included if required for Turnitin submission purposes.