Commitment Of USA To Paris Agreement

Commitment Of Usa To Paris Agreement1commitment Of Usa

COMMITMENT OF USA TO PARIS AGREEMENT 4 COMMITMENT OF USA TO PARIS AGREEMENT Danielle Schummer G328/EVR3410 Human Uses of the Environment According to my thinking, the United States of America should commit itself to the Paris agreement. It will enable the country to contribute the maximum to environmental conservation. The country should make efforts in committing itself to the Paris agreement as it has brought nations from the entire world into a common cause. Thus undertaking the needed ambitions for combating the climatic change and accordingly adapting the possible effects and challenges experienced by each country and coming up with solutions to help the developing countries to withstand the problems encountered.

The agreement will, therefore, chart a new course in the global climate efforts which will help in safeguarding the welfare of the people's health (Maslin, 2007). The United States of America should, again, commit itself to the agreement as its made to strengthen the global responses to the threats brought by adverse climatic changes by developing favorable global temperature rise in the century, for the world to experience a 2 degrees Celsius decrease in the industrialized areas. According to the Paris agreement, the countries, as a whole, should develop different efforts to ensure that the nations experience a 2 degrees Celsius temperature drop. The deal is significant in that it will strengthen countries’ abilities to deal with the results brought by climatic changes as it is realized that it is changing in every century.

The United States committing itself to the deal will again enable it to oversee more developments in the country as a specific financial flow should be witnessed, new technologies developed, and an enhanced capacity building framework brought into existence which will support the actions of the nation by promoting them invulnerable and reliable nations, thus meeting their set objectives (NSTC, 2008). The Paris deal has again provided enough transparency of the efforts by each state and developed a very clear framework for the nations to fight the effects of climate change within a set period. According to my understanding, we can experience global warming as a result of continued air pollution and increased industrialization by many countries in the world.

As the days go by, many industries are constructed and a mechanism is not put in place to protect the polluted air from entering the atmosphere. On the other hand, the Paris agreement has impacted my stand on global warming as it has enabled me to realize that different countries can come together thus developing mechanisms objectively to reduce the occurrence of global warming. As a result of global warming water resources have been affected, leading to a decline in irrigation supplies. This occurs due to the loss of the mountain snowpack hence reducing the amounts of water for the irrigation activities (Philander, 2012). However, global warming will contaminate the underground water, leading to the death of different organisms (Encyclopedia, 2010).

Again, power supply sources will be disrupted, leading to low power production within a given period. This will occur due to the shrinking mountain glaciers. Thus the electricity generations will be profoundly affected. Lastly, global warming concerns water resources by changing the recreational points. The effects on recreation will come as result of the reduced snowpack brought by the continuous pollution in the atmosphere.

The spring snowmelt will affect winter sports hence the costs of the recreational points will be affected. References Encyclopedia of global warming . (2010). Pasadena, Calif: Salem Press. Philander, S. G. (2012). Encyclopedia of global warming & climate change . Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications. National Science and Technology Council (U.S.)., & Climate Change Science Program (U.S.). (2008). Scientific assessment of the effects of global change on the United States . Washington, D.C.: National Science and Technology Council (U.S.), Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. Maslin, M. (2007). Global warming . Stillwater, MN: Voyageur Press. NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY 5 National Energy Policy Danielle Schummer G328/EVR3410 Human Uses of the Environment The government should establish a national energy policy The establishment of a national energy policy is mandatory because the strategies and policies of the sector of national energy will be regular with the overall macro-economic policies of the government's directives like the Medium-Term Strategy and National Vision Plan (NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY, 2010). Even under a reign with a significant private participation in the sector of energy, the Government shall keep on playing an essential role by establishing a legal foundation for the whole sector.

For this reason, the Government shall consistently evaluate the outcomes of its involvement and adjust the policy, strategy, and the legislation as far as energy is concerned (BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER, 2012). Consequently, it is assumed that the entire economy will gain from cost-effective energy supply, protection of various groups of customers, and reduction of negative atmospheric effects. Constructing a Policy · The government should validate a legislation that is “multi-pollutant†to create an adaptable market-based program to particularly decrease and cap nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and mercury emissions from generators of electric power (National Energy Policy Development Group, 2001). · Escalate exports of atmospheric, friendly, market-ready United States technology that foster a clean environment and improve energy efficiency. · Execute new criteria to decrease truck emissions at truck stops. · Direct the administration of Federal Emergency Management to prepare for possible emergencies related to energy. · Reinforce the energy framework of North American Energy to accelerate and expand gas and oil pipelines, investments of energy across borders, and electricity grid connections by expediting and streamlining expediting permitting process with Canada and Mexico.

Renewable Energy Stable Energy Prices Decrease or increase in fossil fuel supply has a direct influence on inflation (Conserve Energy Future, 2017). The cost of energy production from a renewable source of energy depends on the amount of money spent on infrastructure as opposed to inflated natural resource cost, which undoubtedly means one can anticipate more stable prices if energy bulk is generated from renewable sources. Reliability Constant sunshine and wind guarantee renewable energy reliability which by far exceeds fossil fuel reliability. If the source of fossil fuel runs dry, the entire procedure must be moved. Provided they are in place, most of the stations dealing with renewable energy have a permanent and constant fuel source.

As opposed to fossil fuels, in which supply is prone to be affected by strikes, wars, political instability, and trade disputes, renewable sources of energy are not affected by such cons. The wind blows, and the sun shines globally, so every country can utilize that energy and generate clean energy on a large scale. Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions Nearly all the plans concerning renewable energy stress on having much lower carbon footprints, more than any available options on fossil fuels. Renewable sources of energy guarantee a healthier environment since they tend not to pollute it with carbon monoxide as well as any other toxic gases produced by fossil fuels. Also, they cannot decrease the natural resources and can be preserved for a long period. However, despite an emphasis on renewable sources of energy and its advantages, there exist a couple of disadvantages. They include; The high cost of development: A lot of expenses are involved in constructing stations of renewable energy in both manufacturing and research of the components required for these stations to be successful. The known methods of fossil fuel use are less expensive since all the construction and manufacturing processes are readily placed. Large Area Requirement Another disadvantage of renewable energy is the fact that wind farms and solar panels must be set up to generate a large amount of energy. For this reason, a significant portion of land is required for the production of such an amount of energy, especially on a large scale. References BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER. (2012). The Executive Branch and National Energy Policy: Time for Renewal. Washington DC. Conserve Energy Future. (2017). Renewable Energy Pros and Cons. National Energy Policy Development Group. (2001). Reliable, Affordable, and Environmentally Sound Energy for America’s Future. Washington DC: Seal of the President of the United States. NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY. (2010). Saint Lucia National Energy Policy. GMOS AND THE WORLD TODAY 3 Genetically modified food controversies are disputes over the use of foods and other goods derived from genetically modified crops instead of conventional crops, and other uses of genetic engineering in food production. The key areas of controversy related to genetically modified food (GM food or GMO food) are whether such food should be labeled, the role of government regulators, the objectivity of scientific research and publication, the effect of genetically modified crops on health and the environment, the effect on pesticide resistance, the impact of such crops for farmers, and the role of the crops in feeding the world population. In addition, products derived from GMO organisms play a role in the production of ethanol fuels and pharmaceuticals. I am fully in favor of mandatory GMO food labeling so that we all have the right to make an informed decision as to whether we want to ingest GMO foods or not. As an example, let's look at aspartame. There is a lot of controversy surrounding this sugar substitute and it has been linked to serious brain disorders. The law requires that it be labeled as it is an ingredient. I want to know if that product on the shelf contains aspartame or not. By the same token, I want to know if that product on the shelf contains GM product or now so that I have the choice of consuming it or not. Cumulative effects of products such as GMOs are important to take into consideration. Evidence suggests that small genetic changes in plants may produce even larger ecological shifts, meaning that there is potential for GMO´s to become persistent and weedy in agricultural conditions, since they are modified to be resistant to some modern agricultural techniques. This can also mean being invasive in natural settings, where GMOs, of course, do not occur naturally. It is not impossible for new, human modified, plants to become invasive species in delicate, natural ecosystems. Toxicity is a huge issue surrounding chemical pesticides and herbicides, used commonly with GMOs, in addition to the toxicity inherent to these plants. GMOs may be toxic to non-target organisms, bees and butterflies being the most talked-about examples currently. Bees are hugely important in the pollination of many food crops, but are unfortunately extremely endangered by modern agricultural techniques, such as GM crops. Monarch butterflies are specifically at risk from GMO maize plants. In addition to bees and butterflies, birds are also at risk from pesticides, and work as biological control agents and pollinators, again, like bees. I am in favor of the promise of GMO products as long as they are required to A) have the seeds submitted via an impartial intermediary to at least three anonymous and independent laboratories for independent testing to verify the safety of the product, B) They are not modified to allow for herbicidal/pesticidal spraying as the current GM crops are absorbing some of these dangerous herbicides and pesticides that we are consuming and C) a 5 year and 10 year crop study be required to determine the long-term effects on the land. References Lallanilla, Mark (January 11, 2016) GMOs: Facts About Genetically Modified Foods , Retrieved from: ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION 3 Environmental Pollution G328/EVR3410 Human Uses of the Environment Danielle A. Schummer Growing up, I can say my childhood was pretty amazing. I had good friends, but even better places that we knew and were free to play. About a mile from our house was this planted forest that was very large and had tall trees. It had clear paths and people went there for jogging and relaxing. For us, this was where we went to ride our bicycles and often raced against each other. Eventually, this was the place that I formed good memories with nature, because of it’s beauty. Apart from the trees, there were other living creatures like birds, butterflies, squirrels, rabbits, deer, and more. This place became a sanctuary for our games due to the vast space and beauty. We also really enjoyed the different sounds the birds made. As I grew up, this became one of the places that had fast growth and the land became very important for developers. As time went by, the land and the forest were bought and later, all the trees were cut down to create room for real estate developers. Where there used to be fields and flower gardens filled with life, now seems so rocky, congested, and full of garbage. At first, we did not notice if there was any major difference, but all this changed when the rainy season came. Floods became so incontrollable; wind blew without anything to block it and therefore destroyed a lot of things. The weather patterns have also been affected making the amount of rain drop and the garbage has weakened our health. This was an event that really got me thinking about the environment. In conclusion, through personal experience I was able to learn about the different ways in which the environment is often spoiled. Among them is deforestation, water pollution in rivers and the seas, and lastly air pollution through our carbon emissions. There are also many preventive measures that can be taken to make sure that extreme pollution does not occur (Khopkar, 2014). Among the basic measures is educating people about the pollution and also setting up laws and regulations that will help with combating those that contribute to environmental destruction. This can also help in preventing extreme weather conditions like flooding and acidic rain which is caused by air pollution and deforestation. For me, I arrived at my ecological identity through experience and now am continuing through formal education. I have had my “blinders†on throughout most of my life when it comes to the environment. I know I have a lot to learn. I’ve always loved being outdoors and found nature beautiful and amazing. I’m not sure why it has never been a big concern for me before. Maybe I was thinking ignorance is bliss, but I am ready to confront the issues going on in the world and learn how I can help create change for the better. References Khopkar, S. M. (2014). Environmental pollution: Monitoring and control . New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd.

Paper For Above instruction

Environmental conservation and addressing climate change are among the most pressing issues facing the global community today. The United States' commitment to the Paris Agreement exemplifies a critical step towards international collaboration in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fostering sustainable development. This paper advocates for the United States to reaffirm its commitment to the Paris Agreement, emphasizing the moral, environmental, and economic imperatives.

The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015 under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), represents a monumental international effort to combat climate change by limiting global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius, with efforts to cap it at 1.5 degrees Celsius. The agreement hinges on voluntary commitments from nations to undertake nationally determined contributions (NDCs), which include targets for reducing emissions, increasing renewable energy, and adapting to climate impacts. For the United States, re-engagement with this commitment is paramount, both to uphold its international obligations and to lead by example in climate action.

From an environmental perspective, the detrimental impacts of climate change are already evident. Increased frequency and severity of natural disasters such as hurricanes, droughts, floods, and wildfires underscore the urgency of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The U.S., being one of the largest emitters historically, bears a substantial responsibility for global mitigation efforts. Re-committing to the Paris Agreement not only symbolizes accountability but also provides a framework for developing and implementing policies aimed at reducing carbon footprints through enhanced renewable energy adoption, energy efficiency, and innovation in clean technologies.

Economically, climate change poses significant risks to national security, health, agriculture, and infrastructure. Investing in renewable energy sectors can stimulate economic growth and job creation. According to recent studies, transitioning to renewable sources like wind, solar, and hydropower can reduce long-term costs associated with climate-related disasters and healthcare expenses driven by pollution-related health issues. Moreover, strong international commitments can position the U.S. as a leader in green technology, attracting investments and fostering innovation in sectors pivotal for sustainable growth.

Morally and ethically, the United States has a responsibility to act as a steward of the planet for future generations. Climate change disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including low-income communities and developing nations, accentuating existing inequalities. By reaffirming its commitment to the Paris Agreement, the U.S. can demonstrate global solidarity and moral leadership in tackling pressing environmental issues, encouraging other nations to follow suit.

Re-engagement with the Paris Agreement also involves operational strategies such as establishing clear targets, enhancing transparency measures, and ensuring accountability through robust monitoring and reporting mechanisms. The United States should leverage policy tools such as tax incentives, carbon pricing, and regulations that promote clean energy. Furthermore, fostering public-private partnerships can accelerate technological development and deployment, helping to meet climate goals efficiently and effectively.

Critics often argue that international agreements might undermine economic growth or impose excessive burdens. However, evidence shows that the economic risks associated with unmitigated climate change far outweigh the costs of mitigation and adaptation. Embracing the Paris Agreement aligns with the broader objective of sustainable development, safeguarding the environment while promoting economic resilience.

In conclusion, the United States should reaffirm its commitment to the Paris Agreement as a vital step toward global environmental stewardship. This commitment is not only in the national interest but also a moral obligation to contribute to a sustainable future. By actively participating in international climate efforts, the U.S. can lead the way in innovation, economic growth, and ethical responsibility, ensuring a healthier planet for generations to come.

References

• Maslin, M. (2007). Global warming. Voyageur Press.
• National Science and Technology Council (U.S.)., & Climate Change Science Program (U.S.). (2008). Scientific assessment of the effects of global change on the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Science and Technology Council (U.S.), Committee on Environment and Natural Resources.
• Philander, S. G. (2012). Encyclopedia of global warming & climate change. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.
• Khopkar, S. M. (2014). Environmental pollution: Monitoring and control. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd.
• Conserve Energy Future. (2017). Renewable Energy Pros and Cons. Retrieved from https://www.conserve-energy-future.com
• Bipartisan Policy Center. (2012). The executive branch and national energy policy: Time for renewal. Washington D.C.
• National Energy Policy Development Group. (2001). Reliable, affordable, and environmentally sound energy for America’s future. Washington, DC: U.S. Government.
• Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Climate change indicators in the United States. EPA.
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). The Paris Agreement. UNFCCC.
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Sixth Assessment Report. IP