Community Health Advocacy Project Part 3 Nur 544 Version 61

Community Health Advocacy Project Part 3nur544 Version 61assignment

Develop an intervention that addresses one of the levels of prevention for your aggregate using the theory or model selected in Week Four. Describe the intervention plan, including the steps and resources needed. Formulate one outcome goal and various objectives, explaining their appropriateness. Identify community organizations that can assist, and justify their partnership suitability. Explain your plan to evaluate the intervention, including methods and rationale. Present your plan in a format such as PowerPoint, Prezi, Go animate, or another approved medium, with detailed speaker notes and proper APA formatting. Include at least 8 scholarly references. Submit and present your intervention plan as directed.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of an effective community health intervention requires systematic planning grounded in theoretical models and targeted toward specific levels of prevention. For this project, I selected the Health Belief Model (HBM) to guide the intervention aimed at reducing the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes among middle-aged adults in a specified community. This approach integrates behavioral change strategies with community engagement to address modifiable risk factors.

Outcome Goal and Objectives

The primary outcome goal is to decrease the incidence of Type 2 diabetes within the target community by 15% over the next year. To achieve this, specific objectives include increasing community awareness about diabetes risk factors by 40%, promoting healthier dietary choices, and encouraging regular physical activity among residents. These objectives are appropriate because they directly address knowledge deficits, behavioral practices, and environmental factors contributing to diabetes risk, aligning with the constructs of the Health Belief Model, which emphasizes perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, and barriers (Rosenstock, 1974).

Intervention Plan

The intervention involves multiple steps beginning with community assessment to identify existing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to diabetes. Next, educational workshops and health fairs will be organized, utilizing trained peer health educators to foster trust and cultural relevance. Resources needed include educational materials, venues, screening equipment, and personnel for outreach and follow-up. The program will also incorporate digital content such as social media campaigns to reach broader audiences. Collaboration with local clinics and fitness centers will facilitate screening and activity programs. Community health workers will serve as liaisons to sustain engagement and provide ongoing support. This multi-pronged approach ensures comprehensive coverage and sustainable behavioral change (Funnell et al., 2015).

Community Partnerships

Partner organizations include local health clinics, which provide clinical screenings and health counseling; community centers, for hosting events; and local fitness facilities, to promote physical activity programs. These organizations are well-suited to partner because they possess established trust within the community, have infrastructure for health promotion activities, and are aligned with the intervention's goals. Their involvement will enhance credibility, accessibility, and the overall success of the initiative.

Evaluation Plan

The evaluation will adopt both process and outcome measures. The process evaluation will monitor participation rates, fidelity of implementation, and stakeholder engagement through attendance logs, surveys, and observation checklists. The outcome evaluation will assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and diabetes incidence rates through pre- and post-intervention surveys and health records review. Statistical analyses, such as paired t-tests and chi-square tests, will determine the significance of observed changes. These methods are appropriate because they provide quantitative data on program effectiveness and are aligned with the SMART criteria for objectives (Grol & Wensing, 2004). Continuous feedback will guide ongoing improvements to the intervention.

Conclusion

Create a comprehensive, theory-based community health intervention focusing on prevention of type 2 diabetes among middle-aged adults. The plan includes clear goals, strategic partnerships, and robust evaluation methods, with an emphasis on community engagement and sustainability to foster long-term health improvements. Effective implementation and continuous assessment will be essential for achieving the desired health outcomes.

References

• Funnell, M. M., Anderson, R. M., et al. (2015). Patient education and self-management of chronic disease: The role of community health workers. Diabetes Spectrum, 28(3), 210-215.
• Grol, R., & Wensing, M. (2004). Strategies for improving health care. Elsevier Health Sciences.
• Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 328-335.
• Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2015). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass.
• Kinmonth, A. L., et al. (2015). Primary Care- Preventing type 2 diabetes through lifestyle intervention: Framework and model. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 3(4), 278-289.
• Bartholomew, L. K., et al. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach. Jossey-Bass.
• Breaker, C., & Kotu, V. (2019). Data analytics: Concepts, techniques, and applications. Elsevier.
• McKenzie, J. F., et al. (2019). Planning, Implementing, & Evaluating Health Promotion Programs. Pearson.
• Gidley, M., et al. (2017). Community engagement and health promotion: Frameworks and strategies. Journal of Community Health, 42(6), 1200-1207.
• World Health Organization. (2017). Global action plan for the prevention and control of NCDs 2013-2020. WHO Press.