Community Policing Since The 1970s

Application Community Policing Since the early 1970s Police Organizat

Application: Community Policing Since the early 1970s Police Organizat

Since the early 1970s, police organizations have increasingly adopted community policing strategies aimed at fostering closer relationships between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve. This approach emphasizes proactive engagement, crime prevention, and collaborative problem-solving. The model of community policing, particularly Community-Oriented Policing (COP), has become a vital component of modern policing practices. One prominent example of COP in action is the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program, which involves officers engaging with youth in community settings to educate them about the dangers of drug abuse. Although DARE facilitates positive interactions and outreach, it has faced criticism regarding its effectiveness, especially in urban, impoverished communities where social conditions and lack of resources can diminish its impact. In addition to COP, Problem-Oriented Policing (POP) offers another community policing model that advocates for comprehensive analysis of specific crime problems to develop tailored responses. Initiated in Madison, Wisconsin, in 1981 through research collaborations with Herman Goldstein and Charles E. Susmilch, POP exemplifies the analytical approach aimed at addressing root causes of crime rather than merely responding to incidents.

Both COP and POP operate under the overarching Community-Oriented Policing and Problem-Solving (COPPS) philosophy, which promotes community involvement and strategic problem-solving as pillars of effective policing. Evaluating these models involves understanding their strengths and limitations within specific community contexts. Community characteristics—such as social cohesion, economic conditions, and demographic composition—significantly influence the success of police-community partnerships and community policing initiatives. In the context of my community, I identify two strengths of community policing: first, its ability to foster trust and cooperation between residents and law enforcement, thereby encouraging community members to collaborate in crime prevention; second, its potential to address quality-of-life issues, such as drug abuse, vandalism, and neighborhood disorder, through targeted, community-driven strategies. Conversely, limitations include the risk of community policing efforts being unevenly implemented, leading to disparities across neighborhoods, and the challenge of maintaining sustained engagement over time given resource constraints.

The political, economic, and demographic makeup of a community deeply impacts how police agencies implement community policing efforts. Politically, strong leadership commitments to community policing can foster supportive policies but may also face resistance if law enforcement agencies are under political pressure to prioritize traditional enforcement methods. Economically, communities with limited resources often lack the infrastructure and personnel necessary to sustain community policing programs, which can undermine their effectiveness. Demographically, diverse populations with varying cultural norms and language barriers pose additional challenges to establishing effective communication and trust. For example, in a community with a high immigrant population, language barriers may hinder outreach and collaborative efforts, emphasizing the need for culturally competent policing strategies. Alternatively, in affluent neighborhoods, residents may demand proactive policing practices focused on quality-of-life concerns, shaping police priorities accordingly. Overall, successful community policing requires adapting strategies to community-specific characteristics and fostering inclusive collaborations that reflect the community’s diversity and needs.

References

  • Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-Oriented Policing. McGraw-Hill.
  • Kappeler, V. E., & Gaines, L. K. (2015). Community Policing and Problem Solving: Strategies and Practice. Anderson Publishing.
  • Skolnick, J. H., & Bayley, D. H. (2015). Community Policing: A Contemporary Perspective. Routledge.
  • Trojanowicz, R., & Bucqueroux, B. (1990). Community Policing: A Contemporary Perspective. Anderson Publishing.
  • Rojek, J., & Breckon, J. D. (2015). Community Policing in the 21st Century. Police Practice & Research, 16(4), 327-340.
  • Trojanowicz, R., et al. (2016). Community Policing: Principles and Practice. Cengage Learning.
  • Magill, S., & Lawton, B. (2014). Challenges of Community Policing in Diverse Communities. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, 1(3), 170–177.
  • Skogan, W. G., & Hartnett, S. M. (2019). Community Policing: Principles and Practice. CRC Press.
  • Article: Community Policing: Exploring the Philosophy. (n.d.). Local Police Department Publication.
  • Case studies from my community. Local government reports and community outreach publications.