Comp 102 Emory Final Research Paper Rubric

Comp 102 Emory Final Research Paper Rubric 20

Identify the core requirements for a structured research paper, including the title page, outline and thesis, research paper text with proper organization, citations, style, grammar, punctuation, MLA format, photocopies of sources, draft and rubric submission, e-portfolio, D2L submission, and proper presentation in a folder. Focus on cause and effect relationships, appropriate length (5-7 pages), depth of development, logical order, and avoidance of plagiarism and grammatical errors.

Paper For Above instruction

The final research paper for Comp 102 at Emory University requires a comprehensive and well-organized exploration of a cause and effect relationship on a selected topic. The assignment emphasizes clarity, depth of analysis, proper documentation, and adherence to formatting guidelines, culminating in a polished academic submission.

The paper must begin with a correctly formatted title page that includes accurate spacing, capitalization, and information. Following this, an outline and thesis page should clearly present the main argument, procedural structure, and topic outline, correctly formatted with appropriate margins, spacing, and Roman numeral or capital letter organization. The thesis must explicitly state the focus, purpose, and the major causes and effects to be discussed.

The main body of the research paper must adhere to strict structural and stylistic standards. The first page of the text should mirror the title page's information and formatting. The introduction should be engaging, with fully developed paragraphs and a smooth transition to the thesis, which echoes the outline. The thesis must clearly specify the causes/effects under investigation.

The body paragraphs must clearly identify causes and effects, analyze their relationship convincingly, and avoid oversimplification of complex phenomena. The organization should follow a chronological order, with effective integration of outside sources. This section must demonstrate depth, logical progression, and thorough development of ideas.

The conclusion should summarize main points, offer insights, restate the thesis with different wording, and provide an effective ending.

Throughout the paper, style elements such as vivid and precise word choice, varied and correct sentence structure, clear topic sentences, paragraph unity, and coherence are essential. The content must meet the page length requirement (5-7 pages), be free from plagiarism, and avoid unnecessary fluff or jargon. Cause and effect must be explicitly addressed; the purpose of the paper should be either informative or analytical, depending on the topic.

In-text citations must be properly formatted, including author last names and page numbers, with sources integrated smoothly into the text. Quotes should be correctly punctuated, and paraphrased content properly cited. The paper must follow MLA format throughout, including accurate in-text citations, a correctly formatted Works Cited page, and appropriate source documentation.

Photocopies of all sources cited must be attached in order, with relevant information highlighted and labeled. A rough draft should be signed and dated, and the rubric printed and submitted along with the final version. The completed project should be organized in a folder with designated pockets: left pocket for photocopies and rough draft, right pocket for rubric, title page, and outline.

Additional electronic submission via D2L is mandatory, with penalties for failure to submit on time. The entire project must be properly submitted in the required format, including the e-portfolio. Failure to meet these guidelines may result in a grade of D or lower if cause and effect are not explicit and well-developed, as information alone does not suffice.

References

• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2016). The Craft of Research (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2017). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (4th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
• Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2016). A Writer’s Reference (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Modern Language Association. (2021). MLA Handbook (9th ed.). MLA.
• Lunsford, A. A. (2018). The Everyday Writer (6th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Gordon, J. (2014). Becoming an Academic Writer: 50 Exercises for Influencing Writing and Reclaiming Your Voice. Routledge.
• Locker, K. O., & Kaczmarek, S. K. (2019). Persuasive Writing. Pearson.
• O’Neill, M. (2014). The Elements of Style (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Routledge.