Company X Has Just Signed A Business Agreement With Company

Company X Has Just Signed A Business Agreement With Company Y Which E

Company X has just signed a business agreement with Company Y, which entitles both of them to access each other's clients’ records. Faisal, a software programmer at Company Z, was assigned the task of developing a software program that handles the access and retrieval of records from each company’s database system into the other. During development, Faisal discovered a security hole in Company Y's database system that could allow hackers to access confidential client information. He informed his manager, who dismissed the concern, stating that it was not their problem and that they should focus on the software’s functionality. Faisal is uncertain about how to proceed because ignoring the issue conflicts with his ethical principles, but disobeying his manager may jeopardize his employment. The core ethical dilemma involves balancing his professional responsibility to develop secure software and his moral obligation to prevent potential harm caused by the security flaw in Company Y's database system.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The scenario involving Faisal, Company Z, and the agreements between Company X and Company Y highlights critical ethical issues in information technology, corporate responsibility, and professional conduct. At its core, the case underscores the importance of cybersecurity, ethical obligation to clients, and the responsibilities of software developers in safeguarding sensitive information. Faisal’s discovery of the security vulnerability in Company Y’s database system raises questions about confidentiality, professional integrity, and social responsibility. This analysis explores these dimensions by examining the ethical principles at stake, the responsibilities of the involved parties, and the possible courses of action that align with professional and moral standards.

To understand Faisal’s ethical dilemma, it is essential to analyze the context set by the involved entities and the roles of the individuals. Company X and Company Y's agreement to share client data introduces significant privacy concerns, emphasizing the necessity for robust security measures. Faisal, as a software developer at Company Z, is tasked with creating a system that facilitates these data exchanges. During this process, he uncovers a security flaw in Company Y’s database system—a vulnerability that could be exploited by malicious actors. This discovery situates Faisal at the intersection of professional responsibility to deliver functional software and an ethical obligation to prevent harm by alerting relevant parties about security risks.

The core ethical issues reflect principles enshrined in professional conduct codes such as the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Notably, these emphasize honesty, safeguarding public interest, maintaining competence, and ensuring client confidentiality. Faisal’s obligation to inform stakeholders about the security flaw aligns with these principles, especially the duty to preserve the privacy and security of client data. His manager’s dismissive stance conflicts with these ethical imperatives, as ignoring known security issues can lead to severe consequences, including data breaches, loss of client trust, and legal repercussions.

The implications extend beyond individual responsibility, affecting multiple stakeholders. Company Y’s clients have a right to privacy and protection against unauthorized data access, which the security breach threatens. Company X risks exposure to compromised data once information sharing is operational, and Company Z’s reputation could suffer if the security flaw leads to a data breach or is exploited by hackers. Moreover, societal trust in digital infrastructures hinges on responsible management of cybersecurity risks, making this issue a matter of public interest. Consequently, ethical principles demand proactive action to mitigate risks, even when such actions conflict with organizational directives.

Faisal faces a moral and professional dilemma: obey his manager’s directive to focus solely on software functionality or act in accordance with ethical standards to address the security vulnerability. Adherence to the latter would involve informing the appropriate parties about the flaw, prioritizing public safety and client privacy over immediate managerial orders. Failing to act could lead to catastrophic consequences if malicious actors exploit the vulnerability, causing financialloss, reputational damage, and legal liabilities for the involved companies. Conversely, reporting the flaw internally or directly to Company Y could strain professional relationships or threaten Faisal’s employment, yet aligns with ethical obligations.

Potential courses of action include escalating the issue within Company Z, directly informing Company Y’s IT management, or secretly patching the vulnerability if authorized to do so. Among these, the most ethically sound approach is for Faisal to raise the concern with senior management in Company Z and, if necessary, directly contact Company Y’s security team. Transparency ensures that remedial measures can be taken without concealed risks, adhering to the principle of candor. While bypassing hierarchical boundaries may seem risky, such actions are justified to prevent harm and uphold ethical standards.

The optimal solution entails Faisal communicating his findings to higher management at Company Z and, subsequently, to Company Y. This proactive stance embodies professional integrity, prioritizes client safety, and demonstrates accountability. It is rooted in ethical principles emphasizing honesty, confidentiality, and the commitment to public interest. Additionally, establishing formal channels for reporting security vulnerabilities fosters a culture of security awareness and responsible conduct among IT professionals, further protecting organizational and societal interests.

In conclusion, Faisal’s case exemplifies the critical ethical responsibilities of IT professionals to prioritize security, integrity, and societal welfare. Obeying managerial orders at the expense of security risks violates core ethical principles but acting transparently and responsibly aligns with both professional standards and social expectations. Addressing such dilemmas requires courage, moral conviction, and a commitment to uphold the trust placed in technology and its developers. As digital systems increasingly underpin societal functions, fostering an ethical culture in IT workplaces becomes essential to prevent harm and promote public confidence in technological advancements.

References

• Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2013). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. South-Western Cengage Learning.
• Shafer-Landau, R. (2012). The fundamentals of ethics. Oxford University Press.
• ACM Professional Code of Ethics and Conduct. (2018). Association for Computing Machinery. https://www.acm.org/about-acm/acm-code-of-ethics-and-professional-conduct
• Johnstone, N., & Beecham, S. (2018). Software engineering ethics: a systematic review. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30(2), e1925.
• Moore, M., & Parker, R. (2012). Business ethics. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
• Weckert, J., & Cin, M. (2017). Data security and privacy: An ethical perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 19(2), 87–97.
• Spinello, R. (2016). Cyberethics: Morality and law in cyberspace. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Resnik, D. (2018). Responsible conduct of research. Oxford University Press.
• Johnson, D. G. (2018). Technology with no harm: Towards a responsible and ethical use of ICTs. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(6), 1815–1823.
• Goggin, G., & McLelland, M. (2014). Routledge handbook of Internet politics. Routledge.