Compare And Contrast Media And Scholarly Articles On Cyber B

Compare and contrast media and scholarly articles on cyber bullying and M

Compare and contrast media and scholarly articles on cyber bullying and M

The assignment requires a comparative analysis of two pairs of articles on different topics: one pair consists of a mainstream media article about cyberbullying and a peer-reviewed scholarly article on the same subject; the other pair involves a popular magazine article and a scholarly article on Mindfulness Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MCBT). The goal is to examine differences and similarities in language, depth of content, presentation, and the overall purpose of each article within their respective contexts.

Paper For Above instruction

In contemporary discourse, the portrayal and analysis of social issues and therapeutic interventions differ markedly depending on the target audience and publication medium. An illustrative comparison can be made between a mainstream news article examining cyberbullying among youths and a peer-reviewed scientific article delving into the psychological impacts of cyberbullying. Similarly, a contrast exists between a popular psychology magazine’s discussion of Mindfulness Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MCBT) and a scholarly journal's detailed exploration of its efficacy.

Comparison of mainstream and scholarly articles on cyberbullying

The first pair of articles presents divergent approaches to the same topic: cyberbullying. Robin Erb’s USA Today article, “Social-media abuse rampant in middle, high school,” exemplifies a journalistic style aimed at a broad audience, such as parents and adolescents. The language is accessible, engaging, and contains casual expressions like “throwing shade” and colloquialisms such as “squishy little half-formed brains.” The article employs a conversational tone, making the complex issue of cyberbullying comprehensible and immediate for everyday readers. It emphasizes the emotional and social consequences, highlighting the rise in social-media abuse and providing practical advice for parents to communicate effectively with their children, thereby promoting immediate awareness and action.

Conversely, the scholarly article, “Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying,” published in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence, offers an evidence-based and technical perspective. It employs precise scientific terminology, detailed statistical analyses, and references to empirical research. This article aims to expand understanding of the psychological effects of cyberbullying, such as internalizing difficulties, and discusses nuanced factors like reluctance among victims to report abuse, backed by data (Bonnano & Hymel, 2013). The language is formal, and its purpose is to inform researchers, clinicians, and policymakers rather than casual readers.

The core similarity between the two is their shared objective to raise awareness about cyberbullying's serious effects. Both articles conclude with calls for action—parents are advised to monitor and communicate with their children in the mainstream article, while the scholarly piece advocates for continued research and targeted interventions to address this issue effectively.

Comparison of popular and scholarly articles on MCBT

The second pair of articles explores Mindfulness Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MCBT). Barnhofer et al.’s (2015) peer-reviewed article, “Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) reduces the association between depressive symptoms and suicidal cognitions in patients with a history of suicidal depression,” provides a rigorous scientific examination of how MCBT can alleviate depression and reduce suicidal ideation. It details methodology, statistical validation, and clinical implications, tailored toward mental health professionals and academics familiar with psychotherapeutic research (Barnhofer et al., 2015).

Meanwhile, the article “Mindfulness — perhaps it’s time to harness the power of mindfulness as treatment,” published in Psychology Today by Dr. Mark Borgini (2016), discusses mindfulness as a stress-relieving practice in a language suitable for a general audience. It emphasizes mindfulness's benefits for managing everyday stress, anxiety, and depression, referencing popular practices such as meditation and yoga. The tone is accessible and anecdotal, aiming to inform and persuade lay readers about adopting mindfulness techniques.

The key difference lies in depth and intent. The scholarly article provides detailed research findings, statistical analyses, and clinical implications, appealing to readers seeking specialized knowledge or considering clinical application. In contrast, the popular magazine article summarizes the concept of mindfulness, emphasizes its practical benefits, and provides motivational insights suitable for casual readers or individuals seeking immediate stress relief.

Both articles share the common purpose of promoting mental health and well-being but differ markedly in their approach: one emphasizes scientific validation and technical details, while the other underscores accessibility and practical application for everyday life.

Conclusion

In sum, the comparison between media and scholarly articles reveals how language, scope, and depth are tailored to the intended audience. Mainstream articles tend to simplify and personalize issues to foster awareness and prompt action, whereas scholarly articles provide comprehensive, data-driven insights aimed at advancing scientific understanding and informing clinical practice. Recognizing these differences enhances critical reading skills and allows for a nuanced interpretation of how information is presented across publication types. Such understanding is essential not only for academic purposes but also for informed engagement with societal issues and health practices.

References

  • Bonnano, R., & Hymel, S. (2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9910-2
  • Borgini, M. (2016). Mindfulness — perhaps it’s time to harness the power of mindfulness as treatment. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mental-health-matters/201605/mindfulness-and-depression
  • Barnhofer, T., Crane, C., Brennan, K., Duggan, D. S., Crane, R. S., Eames, C., & Williams, J. G. (2015). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) reduces the association between depressive symptoms and suicidal cognitions in patients with a history of suicidal depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(6). https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000067
  • Erb, R. (2015, April 12). Social-media abuse rampant in middle, high school. USA Today. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/04/12/social-media-abuse-among-teens/25760231/
  • Additional peer-reviewed and popular literature references related to cyberbullying, mental health, and mindfulness as relevant should be incorporated to ensure scholarly depth and support.