Compare And Contrast The Overarching Ideas Of Natural System

compare And Contrast The Overarching Ideas Of Natural Systems Theory

Compare and contrast the overarching ideas of natural systems theory and open systems theory. Natural systems theory indicates that organizational members are members due to their commitment to attaining organizational goals. That is because there is a variation between the ‘real’ and stated objectives the organization pursues (between the operational objectives being observed and the professed objectives that are announced) (Tompkins, 2004). The difference indicates that the real agreed-upon objective is a multifaceted series of objectives with varying meanings at different organizational levels.

However, unlike the natural systems theory, the open systems theory indicates the impact of the environment on the business (Tompkins, 2004). Since all systems as shown in this assignment help are regarded as a blend of parts where its connection makes them co-dependent, there are several ways the environment is involved in the relationship. Firstly, the system transforms into organic or open system while process or walls do not restrain the organizational structure within the business. Secondly, the organization is infiltrated, supported, and shaped by the environment surrounding the business.

Paper For Above instruction

The comparison between natural systems theory and open systems theory reveals foundational differences in how organizations are viewed in relation to their internal objectives and external environment. Natural systems theory emphasizes the internal dynamics and inherent goals within organizations, positing that members are committed to achieving organizational goals that often have both stated and real, sometimes differing, objectives. This theory suggests that organizations are complex, adaptable systems where internal cooperation and shared objectives drive success. Its focus is on the autonomous functioning of the organization, with an acknowledgment of the multi-level objectives that influence organizational behavior (Tompkins, 2004).

Contrastingly, open systems theory places a greater emphasis on the influence of external environments on organizational processes. It views organizations as integrated parts of a broader environment, where exchange and interaction with external factors are essential for survival and growth. From this perspective, organizations are seen as organic, adaptable entities that must respond to external stimuli, such as market forces, technological changes, and social dynamics. The environment shapes organizational structure and processes, fostering a co-dependent relationship that sustains the organization (Tompkins, 2004). Both theories recognize the importance of internal cohesion, but while natural systems focus inward on internal goals and conflicts, open systems emphasize external interactions and adaptability.

The distinction hinges on the internal versus external focus: natural systems theory underscores internal cohesion and goal alignment, whereas open systems theory underscores environmental influence and responsiveness. Understanding these frameworks helps organizations develop strategies that balance internal objectives with external demands, ensuring resilience and competitiveness in dynamic environments.

References

• Tompkins, J. R. (2004). Organization theory and public management. Cengage Learning.
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
• Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.
• Fox-Wolfgramm, S. J., Boal, K. B., & Hunt, J. G. (1998). Organizational adaptation to institutional change: A comparative study of long-term care and high technology industries. Organization Science, 9(3), 291-310.
• Daft, R. L. (2015). Organization theory and design. Cengage Learning.
• Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
• Herbert, S. (1880). The principles of sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 2(5), 611-627.
• Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. McGraw-Hill.
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Harper & Brothers.
• Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18(1), 21-32.