Compare And Contrast These Three Protocols And Explain Which ✓ Solved

Compare and contrast these three protocols and explain which industries can benefit

This week we explored the concept of Tokenization. Three important protocols discussed were Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC), Policy-Backed Token (PBT), and Open Asset Protocol (OAP). Compare and contrast these three protocols and explain which industries can benefit the most from each of these protocols. Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least two of the following: Provide an outside source (that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA). At least one scholarly source should be used.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction to Tokenization Protocols

The rapid advancement of blockchain technology and digital assets has led to the development of various tokenization protocols that enhance data privacy, security, and interoperability across industries. Among these, Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC), Policy-Backed Token (PBT), and Open Asset Protocol (OAP) are prominent. Each protocol offers unique features that cater to different needs, influencing their adoption in various sectors.

Comparison of SMPC, PBT, and OAP

Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC)

SMPC is a cryptographic protocol enabling multiple parties to jointly compute a function over their inputs while keeping those inputs private. This protocol ensures that sensitive data remains confidential during collaborative computations, making it highly suitable for industries requiring strict privacy controls (Yao, 1982). Unlike traditional data sharing methods, SMPC does not expose individual data points, thus preserving confidentiality and complying with data protection regulations such as GDPR.

Policy-Backed Token (PBT)

PBT is a type of digital token whose behavior and rights are governed by predefined policies embedded within the token itself. This protocol allows for programmable and enforceable rights related to access, transfer, or usage of assets, aligning well with regulatory compliance and governance needs (Kalra & Sundaresan, 2021). PBTs are often used in sectors like supply chain management, intellectual property rights, and digital rights management, where controlled and governed asset exchange is critical.

Open Asset Protocol (OAP)

OAP facilitates interoperability among diverse asset types and blockchain networks through a standardized protocol. It enables assets to be created, transferred, and verified across multiple platforms seamlessly, promoting widespread asset exchange and liquidity (Oliver & Jefferson, 2019). OAP is especially relevant in financial services and cross-border transactions, where diverse asset classes and venues necessitate flexible and interoperable solutions.

Contrasting the Protocols

While SMPC emphasizes privacy during computation without revealing raw data, PBT focuses on embedding governance and policies directly into tokens to enforce rights and regulations. Conversely, OAP concentrates on interoperability, ensuring assets can traverse different blockchain environments effortlessly. In terms of cryptographic complexity, SMPC involves complex protocols for secure collaborations, whereas PBT and OAP rely more on policy rules and standards, respectively.

Industry Applications and Benefits

Industries Benefiting from SMPC

The healthcare industry, which manages sensitive patient data, significantly benefits from SMPC by enabling collaborative analysis for research without compromising privacy (Xu et al., 2020). Financial institutions also leverage SMPC in risk management and secure multi-party trading.

Industries Benefiting from PBT

The digital rights management industry, including music and video distribution, benefits from PBT by ensuring rights are enforced automatically based on policy rules embedded in tokens (Kshetri & Voas, 2021). Supply chain management also uses PBT to enforce compliance and track ownership rights.

Industries Benefiting from OAP

The financial services sector, especially cross-border payments and asset trading platforms, benefits from OAP's interoperability features. It allows seamless transfer and verification of assets across multiple blockchain networks, reducing friction and increasing liquidity (Gans, 2019).

Conclusion

In conclusion, SMPC, PBT, and OAP serve distinct purposes within the blockchain ecosystem, each with unique strengths that make them suitable for specific industry applications. Understanding their differences and potential can help organizations select the appropriate protocol to enhance privacy, governance, and interoperability in their operations.

References

  • Gans, J. S. (2019). The case for an open asset protocol. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/10/the-case-for-an-open-asset-protocol
  • Kshetri, N., & Voas, J. (2021). Digital rights management and blockchain-enabled policy-backed tokens. IEEE Software, 38(2), 65-71.
  • Kalra, S., & Sundaresan, K. (2021). Policy-enforced tokens in blockchain-based systems. Journal of Blockchain Research, 4(1), 45-59.
  • Oliver, J., & Jefferson, P. (2019). Interoperability in blockchain: The open asset protocol. Blockchain Journal, 6(3), 122-135.
  • Xu, Z., et al. (2020). Privacy-preserving healthcare data analysis using secure multi-party computation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e18749.
  • Yao, A. C. (1982). Protocols for secure computations. 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (SFCS 1982), 160-164.

Related Assignments