Compare And Contrast Two Theories On Why Adolescents ✓ Solved

Compare and contrast two differing theories as to why adolescents use drugs and what can be done to stop this behavior

Understanding the reasons behind adolescent drug use remains a significant focus within both psychological and sociological research. Theories explaining why teenagers engage in drug use often guide intervention strategies aimed at reducing such behaviors. This essay compares and contrasts two prominent theories: the peer influence theory and the adventure or thrill-seeking theory. Each provides a different perspective on the motivations behind drug use among adolescents and suggests distinct approaches for prevention and intervention.

The peer influence theory posits that adolescents are heavily influenced by their social groups, and peer pressure is a primary driver of drug use. This theory suggests that teenagers tend to conform to the behaviors and attitudes of their friends to gain social acceptance or avoid rejection. According to Baron (2003), peer influence can be particularly potent during adolescence because of the developmental need for social acceptance and the desire to belong. Peer networks often legitimize drug use, making it seem like a normative or even necessary behavior within the peer group. Therefore, interventions based on this theory typically emphasize peer education, social skills training, and promoting healthy peer relationships to reduce the impact of peer pressure on drug use.

Contrastingly, the adventure or thrill-seeking theory attributes adolescent drug use to innate curiosity and a predisposition toward risk-taking. Walters (2014) suggests that teenagers are naturally inclined to seek new and intense experiences, which can include experimenting with drugs. This behavior is often driven by a desire for excitement, a need to demonstrate bravery, or to rebel against authority figures. The thrill associated with drug use can provide a sense of power and invincibility, especially when adolescents are motivated by the need to stand out or push boundaries. Prevention strategies rooted in this theory focus on offering safe outlets for risk-taking, such as sports or adventure activities, and fostering resilience and decision-making skills to help teens resist the allure of risky behaviors like drug use.

Comparison and Contrast

Both theories acknowledge that social factors influence adolescent drug use but differ markedly in their explanations of underlying motivations. The peer influence theory emphasizes external social pressures and the importance of peer groups in shaping behavior. Its central premise is that adolescents may use drugs to gain acceptance or emulate their friends. This approach suggests that modifying peer dynamics and social environments can effectively curb drug use among youth.

In contrast, the adventure theory emphasizes internal predispositions such as curiosity and sensation-seeking tendencies. It views drug use as a form of self-expression and a response to internal drives for novelty and excitement. While peer influence operates primarily through social conformity, the thrill-seeking perspective highlights individual personality traits and developmental processes. Consequently, intervention strategies derived from this theory tend to focus on addressing personal risk tendencies and providing alternative outlets for thrill-seeking behavior.

Despite their differences, both theories have important implications for prevention. For example, addressing peer influence may involve programs that promote healthy peer relationships and resistant skills training. Conversely, strategies inspired by the adventure theory might focus on engaging adolescents in exciting and meaningful activities that satisfy their need for novelty without resorting to drug use.

Strategies to Stop Adolescent Drug Use

To effectively deter drug use among adolescents, a multifaceted approach that integrates insights from both theories is essential. Education campaigns that target peer norms and promote anti-drug attitudes can diminish the influence of peer pressure. School-based programs that foster social competence and decision-making skills are also valuable. Simultaneously, offering engaging alternatives such as adventure sports, arts, or community service can satisfy teens’ sensation-seeking drives, reducing the allure of drugs.

Furthermore, family involvement and community support are crucial components. Parental monitoring, open communication, and reinforcing anti-drug values can mitigate external influences, while resilience training can help internal drives for risk-taking be channeled into positive pursuits. Tailoring interventions to consider both social influences and individual personality traits increases their overall effectiveness in preventing adolescent drug use.

Conclusion

In summary, the peer influence and adventure theories provide contrasting yet complementary explanations for why adolescents might engage in drug use. While peer influence emphasizes social conformity and acceptance, the adventure theory highlights innate curiosity and thrill-seeking tendencies. Effective prevention requires an integrated approach that addresses both external social pressures and internal drives, utilizing strategies such as peer education, engaging activities, family support, and individual resilience training. Understanding these differing motivations allows for more targeted and potentially more successful interventions to reduce adolescent drug use and promote healthier development during these formative years.

References

• Baron, S. W. (2003). Self-Control, Social Consequences, and Criminal Behavior: Street Youth and the General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 403–426.
• Walters, G. D. (2014). Drugs, Crime, and Their Relationships: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and Protective Factors for Alcohol and Other Drug Problems in Adolescence and Early Adulthood: Implications for Prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105.
• Kandel, D. B. (1980). Drug Use and Delinquent Behavior in Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37(4), 351–357.
• Bryant, A., & Hueston, W. (1995). The Role of Peer and Parental Influences on Adolescent Substance Use. Journal of School Health, 65(8), 337–342.
• Steinberg, L. (2008). Adolescence (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Miller, P. (2010). Social Norms Approaches to Substance Use Prevention. Addiction Research & Theory, 18(2), 155–157.
• Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. Harvard University Press.
• Chambers, R. (2008). Understanding Teen Risk-Taking Behavior. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(3), 318–327.
• Lynskey, M., & Hall, W. (2000). The Effects of Adolescent Cannabis Use on Educational Attainment: A Review. Addiction, 95(11), 1621–1630.