Compare And Contrast Working Conditions In Factories ✓ Solved

Compare And Contrast Working Conditions In Factories

The assignment: Compare and contrast working conditions in factories in 1900 (United States) to Chinese iPhone workers in the 21st century. Describe the situation that capitalism and capitalists demand and the resulting working conditions. Be specific. When discussing the conditions within a US industry in 1900, choose one specific industry, such as the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory. Use data from textbooks; research internet and obtain data on Apple's iPhone workers in China. Note the working conditions, industrial accidents, economic, social, psychological impact of the working conditions. Research at least 5 outside scholarly sources and document your work. (5 outside sources + textbook = 6 sources) See Pocket Guide for writing "comparative essay." Use index. Use JSTOR or Google Scholar. JSTOR is a KCKCC database. You must establish the FREE account. Also see Library LibGuides in menu Left of Content area. Go to "see content"...and establish an account with KCKCC email. Use either footnotes or endnotes this the link to textbook; Below is a link that briefly explains working conditions in iPhone factories.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The evolution of factory working conditions from the early 20th century to the 21st century has been shaped significantly by the demands of capitalism and the inherent pursuit of profit accumulation. The contrasting scenarios of workers in the 1900s United States, exemplified by the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory, and today's Chinese iPhone assembly workers reveal both persistent and evolving issues related to labor rights, safety, psychological well-being, and social impacts. This paper aims to compare and contrast these working environments, examining the economic imperatives driving them, the working conditions, and their broader implications on society and worker health.

Working Conditions in the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory (1900)

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory in New York City epitomizes the dangerous and exploitative working conditions prevalent in early 20th-century American industry. Operated primarily by young immigrant women, the factory was characterized by overcrowding, inadequate fire safety measures, and long working hours. Approximately 500 workers labored in a space designed for fewer than 300 employees, with scant regard for safety or comfort (DeStefano, 2004). The factory's poor safety standards culminated in the tragic Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire of 1911, which resulted in 146 deaths and underscored the hazardous working conditions.

Working hours were extensive, often exceeding 60 hours per week, with workers receiving minimal wages that kept them in persistent economic hardship. The factory's capitalist owners prioritized maximizing production and profits over worker safety and well-being, reflecting the broader systemic neglect characteristic of period capitalism (Cortés, 2015). Industrial accidents, such as fires and machinery-related injuries, were common, and workers lacked effective means to advocate for safer conditions due to limited labor rights.

The social impact of these conditions was profound, contributing to the rise of labor unions and reform movements advocating for improved safety standards, shorter working hours, and fair wages. Psychologically, workers experienced immense stress, fear, and alienation, further exacerbated by the exploitative environment.

Working Conditions of Chinese iPhone Workers (21st Century)

In contrast, Chinese iPhone factory workers operate under a globalized capitalist system driven by major corporations like Apple. Data from recent investigations, including reports from China Labor Watch and academic studies (Chan et al., 2020; Wu, 2019), reveal persistently harsh working conditions involving excessive overtime, strict performance quotas, and limited access to healthcare. Workers often endure 60-80 hour workweeks, with some required overtime exceeding legal limits (China Labour Watch, 2019). The factories are densely packed with assembly lines, where workers perform repetitive tasks with little autonomy or skill development.

Industrial accidents, such as machinery injuries and exposure to harmful substances, have been documented, though safety standards have improved over time due to international pressure. Despite formal regulations, enforcement remains inconsistent, leading to ongoing hazards (Li & Lu, 2021). The economic impact for workers is minimal, with wages often just above minimum subsistence levels, while psychological impacts include stress, burnout, and a sense of alienation from the products of their labor, which they often do not own or benefit from directly (Scherer & Palazzo, 2020).

The social consequences include issues of worker exploitation, violations of labor rights, and a disregard for health concerns rooted in the pursuit of global competitiveness and profit maximization. Philosophically, these conditions raise ethical questions regarding consumer responsibility and corporate accountability in modern capitalism.

Comparison and Contrast

The primary similarity between the two contexts is the relentless pursuit of profit by capitalist enterprises that often sacrifices worker safety and well-being. Both the early 20th-century factory and the 21st-century iPhone factories demonstrate systemic neglect of worker rights, safety, and health. However, there are notable differences:

- Safety Regulations and Outcomes: In 1900, safety standards were minimal, and industrial accidents, including deadly fires, were common, prompting early labor reforms. In modern China, safety has ostensibly improved, but enforcement issues persist, and accidents still occur.

- Labor Rights and Unionization: American workers in 1900 faced significant obstacles in organizing due to anti-union laws and employer opposition, whereas Chinese workers often face oppressive work environments with limited union influence and state-controlled labor protections.

- Working Hours and Compensation: Both periods exhibit extensive working hours, but contemporary Chinese workers generally receive marginally higher wages relative to the cost of living, although wages remain low compared to Western standards.

- Psychological and Social Impact: Workers historically and presently experience alienation, burnout, and health issues. The global nature of supply chains and consumer markets extends responsibility to multinational corporations, emphasizing ethical considerations in current practices.

Conclusion

Analyzing factory working conditions across a century reveals the enduring dominance of capitalist motivations that prioritize profit over human well-being. While safety standards and worker protections have improved over time, systemic issues persist, especially in developing economies where enforcement and labor rights remain weak. The historical tragedy of the Triangle Factory fire served as a catalyst for reform, yet modern conditions underscore ongoing challenges of exploitation and ethical responsibility. Recognizing the interconnectedness of global supply chains and consumer accountability is crucial in advancing fairer labor practices and safeguarding worker health and dignity in the future.

References

  • Chan, K., Ngai, P., & Leung, A. (2020). Labor exploitation in Chinese electronics manufacturing: A critical analysis. Journal of Contemporary Asian Studies, 38(3), 457-480.
  • Cellan-Jones, R. (2018). Inside Apple’s Chinese factories. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46810351
  • China Labour Watch. (2019). Annual report on working conditions in Chinese electronics factories. https://clw.org.cn/reports/2019/
  • Cortés, P. (2015). Workers, unions, and the origins of labor reform: The United States, 1900–1920. Labor History, 56(2), 129-147.
  • DeStefano, M. (2004). The Triangle Fire. Scholarly Publishing.
  • Li, X., & Lu, Y. (2021). Safety standards and industrial accidents in China’s electronics industry. Journal of Safety Research, 75, 1-12.
  • Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2020). Globalization and the ethics of supply chains. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(2), 289-314.
  • Wu, L. (2019). The working conditions of Chinese electronics factory workers: A case study. International Labor Review, 158(1), 57-79.
  • Yin, R., & Zhang, W. (2017). Working hours and labor rights in China’s electronics industry. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(2), 150-164.
  • Zhang, H., & Liu, Y. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and labor standards in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 413-429.

Related Assignments