Compare This Definition To That Of The Standard Model

Compare this definition to that of the standard model based

Compare this definition to that of the standard model-based

Homework 9 answer The Following Questions 10 Point Each1 Consider

Homework 9answer The Following Questions 10 Point Each1 Consider

Homework 9 Answer the following questions: (10 point each) 1. Consider the following definition of an anomaly: An anomaly is an object that is unusually influential in the creation of a data model. a. Compare this definition to that of the standard model-based definition of an anomaly. b. For what sizes of data sets (small, medium, or large) is this definition appropriate? 2.

In one approach to anomaly detection, objects are represented as points in a multidimensional space, and the points are grouped into successive shells, where each shell represents a layer around a grouping of points, such as a convex hull. An object is an anomaly if it lies in one of the outer shells. a. To which of the definitions of an anomaly in Section 9.2 is this definition most closely related? b. Name two problems with this definition of an anomaly. 3.

Consider the (relative distance) K-means scheme for outlier detection described in Section 9.5 and the accompanying figure, Figure 9.10. a. The points at the bottom of the compact cluster shown in Figure 9.10 have a somewhat higher outlier score than those points at the top of the compact cluster. Why? b. Suppose that we choose the number of clusters to be much larger, e.g., 10. Would the proposed technique still be effective in finding the most extreme outlier at the top of the figure?

Why or why not? c. The use of relative distance adjusts for differences in density. Give an example of where such an approach might lead to the wrong conclusion. 4. Compare the following two measures of the extent to which an object belongs to a cluster: (1) distance of an object from the centroid of its closest cluster and (2) the silhouette coefficient described in Section 7.5.2.

5. Consider a set of points that are uniformly distributed on the interval [0,1]. Is the statistical notion of an outlier as an infrequently observed value meaningful for this data? 1 What you should know about adult depression The Joint Commission is the largest health care accrediting body in the United States that promotes quality and safety. Helping health care organizations help patients What you should know about adult depression was developed in collaboration with SpeakUPTM Everybody feels blue or sad sometimes.

Depression is more than just feeling sad. When you are depressed you lose interest in activities, and you may feel overwhelmed, agitated or isolated. You may feel like things will never get better. If you have these feelings for two weeks or longer, you may be depressed. Depression is a common, but serious condition.

The good news is that you are not alone and you can get better and feel like yourself again. This brochure gives you information about depression, questions to ask a doctor or therapist, and advice on how to speak up if you or a loved one needs help. What are the warning signs of depression? q Feeling sad, down, irritable, nervous, or out of sorts q Loss of interest or pleasure in almost all activities q Feeling worthless, guilty, hopeless, or helpless q Eating more or less than usual q Difficulty thinking or making decisions q Little or no interest in sex q Low energy, tiredness q Feeling restless or agitated q Sleeping more or less than usual q Withdrawal from others q Talking about or having thoughts of death or suicide American Psychiatric Association Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance Mental Health America NAMI: National Alliance on Mental Illness National Association of Psychiatric Health Systems National Association of Social Workers National Suicide Prevention Lifeline National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors National Institute of Mental Health Get help now if you are thinking about suicide!

Call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at -TALK(8255) or go to You can also call 911 or go to an emergency room. The goal of the Speak Up™ program is to help patients become more informed and involved in their health care. Who can be affected by depression? Depression can affect anyone at any age. The following may put you at risk: q Family history of depression, bipolar disorder, or substance abuse q Having another mental health condition, such as: • Previous episode of depression • Post traumatic stress disorder • Anxiety disorder • Alcohol and other substance abuse q Stressful life events, such as divorce, job loss or the death or illness of someone close to you; even positive events such as a baby, marriage, graduation, or new job q Trauma, such as childhood neglect or abuse, experiencing or witnessing violence, or surviving disasters q Some prescription medicines q Health issues, such as: • Thyroid disease and other hormone disorders • Cancer • Diabetes, heart disease, kidney failure, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, stroke • Serious injury needing extensive rehabilitation How can you get help?

Where do you start? The important thing is to speak up and ask for help. Talk to a friend, family member, doctor, or reach out to someone in your faith community. A doctor can help determine what is going on, why it is happening, and how to help. See if there is an employee assistance program, known as an EAP, at your job.

You can also call the local community mental health center, a therapist, or a help line. What are your treatment options? Your options may include talk therapy or counseling, medicines, support groups, and other help. The treatments often work better when they are used together. Can you get better without treatment?

Depression can be damaging when left untreated. It can lead to relationship problems, unemployment, and even suicide. Do not wait and hope that the symptoms will go away. Drugs or alcohol may seem like a quick fix, but they can make your depression worse. Do not be ashamed or embarrassed to seek treatment.

You deserve treatment. Treatment works. What should you know about therapy? Talk therapy is an effective way to treat your depression. Therapy can help you learn about your depression and find ways to manage it.

You should feel safe and comfortable discussing your thoughts and feelings with your therapist. If you feel therapy is not working, it is OK to ask for a referral to someone else. You should also ask: q How will therapy help you? q What kind of therapy do they recommend? q Have they treated someone with symptoms like yours? q How long should treatment last? q How do they develop a treatment plan? The plan should be based on your needs, strengths, preferences, and goals. q Is treatment confidential? q What is their availability after hours? On weekends?

In case of emergency? What should you know about medicines? You may be prescribed medicine for your depression. Work with your doctor to find one that works well for you. Make sure you provide a list of your current medicines and supplements. q You should know: • There are different medicines that are used to treat depression. • You may have to try more than one. • It may take a while to get the right dose. q You should ask: • Why is the medicine right for you? • What are the side effects? • What if you miss a dose? • What if you are pregnant or thinking of getting pregnant? • What should you do if the medicine makes you feel worse?

Can a family member or friend help you? Depression can make it hard to reach out to people for help. However, isolating yourself can make your depression worse. It may be good to have a family member or friend, also called an advocate, be a partner in your care. Your advocate can: q Help you make and get to appointments q Write down instructions and ask questions q Motivate you and help you focus on your strengths and goals for treatment q Recognize changes in your condition q Ask for help if you are not getting what you need What can you do to feel better?

Feeling better takes time. There are many things you can do to help your treatment be successful. Your doctor or therapist can give you advice on where to start. You should: q Follow your treatment plan. Talk to your doctor or therapist if you need to change something. • DO NOT abruptly stop treatment or medicines if things are not working.

Be patient. It may take time to see improvements. • DO NOT abruptly stop treatment or medicines if you are feeling better. This could cause the depression to return. q Stick to your daily routine. Go to work. Go to school.

Get out of the house. See other people. q Exercise and eat a healthy diet q Get enough sleep q Reduce stress and practice relaxation techniques q Spend time outdoors q Join a support group q Be good to yourself. Depression is not your fault. Where can you find more information? Information and referrals, -NAMI (6264) or NAMI HelpLine, Locate a treatment program, Mental Health First Aid, Mood disorder information and referrals, , Help in paying for medicines,

Paper For Above instruction

In this comprehensive examination of anomaly detection and mental health awareness, we explore multiple facets of identifying irregular patterns in data and understanding depression, a prevalent mental health condition. Initially, the analysis compares the definition of an anomaly as an object unusually influential in data modeling with the standard model-based definitions. While the influence-based definition emphasizes the impact of specific data points on the model's formation, the traditional statistical or density-based models focus on outliers that deviate significantly from the majority distribution (Barnett & Lewis, 1994). The influence-based perspective is especially relevant for small datasets where individual points can disproportionately sway the model, such as in clinical diagnostics with limited samples (Hodge & Austin, 2004). For large datasets, the influence of individual points diminishes, making influence-based definitions less practical and more susceptible to noise.

The shell-based approach to anomaly detection in multidimensional space involves grouping objects into layers, with anomalies identified as objects in outer shells. This methodology aligns most closely with the model-based definition where anomalies are outliers that deviate from normative data patterns (Chandola et al., 2009). However, problems arise when such outer shell boundaries do not account for the true data distribution complexities, possibly leading to false identification of outliers in regions with high variance or underlying structures not captured by convex hulls (Rousseeuw & Van Driessen, 1999). Additionally, objects near the boundary may be misclassified, and the method can be computationally expensive in high dimensions due to the curse of dimensionality.

The relative-distance K-means technique assesses outliers by measuring their distance relative to cluster centers, adjusting for density variations. In the community illustrated by Figure 9.10, outliers at the bottom of the cluster exhibit higher outlier scores because their relative distance from the cluster centroid is larger in comparison to the more central points. When expanding the number of clusters, the technique's effectiveness diminishes because the notion of an "extreme outlier" becomes less defined across multiple smaller clusters, which can fragment the data and obscure truly isolated anomalies. This approach could also give misleading conclusions in cases where density variations are non-uniform due to clustering heterogeneity, leading to potential falsely identified outliers in dense regions or overlooking outliers in sparse areas.

Comparing two measures of cluster membership—distance from the centroid versus silhouette coefficient—offers different insights. The distance measures proximity to the center of a cluster, providing a straightforward numeric indicator of belongingness (Rousseeuw, 1987). Conversely, the silhouette coefficient considers both intra-cluster cohesion and inter-cluster separation, offering a normalized measure that captures how well an object fits within its cluster compared to others (Meng et al., 2014). The silhouette score generally provides a more comprehensive assessment of cluster validity and object membership than simple distance calculations.

Considering uniformly distributed points over the interval [0,1], the concept of an outlier as an infrequent observation becomes less meaningful statistically. In uniform distributions, all points are equally probable, and the expected frequency of any specific value is consistent, rendering the notion of outliers based on rarity inappropriate (Huber & Ronchetti, 2009). Instead, outlier detection in such scenarios might focus on measurement errors or anomalies outside the uniform assumption.

This understanding underscores the importance of selecting appropriate anomaly detection methods based on the data context and distribution characteristics (Ahmed et al., 2016). Transitioning to mental health, specifically depression, emphasizes the multifaceted nature of health awareness campaigns. Depression affects individuals worldwide across ages and backgrounds, often exacerbated by genetic predispositions, environmental stressors, or biological factors like hormonal disorders and chronic illnesses (Kessler et al., 2003). The brochure's information highlights signs, risk factors, and treatment options, aligning with clinical guidelines for early intervention (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

Effective treatment involves counseling, medication, and support systems, including family or friends who can act as advocates (Cuijpers et al., 2014). Encouraging individuals to seek help underscores the importance of removing stigma and promoting mental health literacy (Corrigan & Watson, 2002). Lifestyle changes, like exercise and social engagement, complement clinical treatment, emphasizing holistic approaches to mental health recovery (Figueroa et al., 2018). Accessible sources of information, community programs, and crisis helplines are critical components in managing depression and reducing suicide risk.

Overall, understanding anomaly detection methods allows for better scrutiny of data irregularities, crucial in fields such as fraud detection, network security, or medical diagnostics. Concurrently, increasing awareness of depression and the importance of timely intervention can significantly improve health outcomes and save lives. Both topics highlight the importance of precise, context-aware approaches—whether in data science or mental health—to address complex challenges effectively.

References

  • Ahmed, M., Mahmood, A. N., & Hu, J. (2016). A survey of anomaly detection techniques in financial domain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 55, 278-288.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). APA Publishing.
  • Barnett, V., & Lewis, T. (1994). Outliers in Statistical Data. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 15.
  • Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., Reijnders, M., et al. (2014). The effects of psychotherapies for depression in adults on remission, recovery and improvement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 44(12), 2457-2469.
  • Figueroa, C. A., et al. (2018). Lifestyle interventions for depression: A review of the literature. Current Psychiatry Reports, 20(12), 114.
  • Hodge, V. J., & Austin, J. (2004). A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artificial Intelligence Review, 22(2), 85–126.
  • Huber, P. J., & Ronchetti, E. M. (2009). Robust Statistics (2nd ed.). Wiley.
  • Kessler, R. C., et al. (2003). The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA, 289(23), 3095-3105.
  • Meng, X., et al. (2014). Evaluating clustering validity in unsupervised learning: A review. Pattern Recognition Letters, 35, 1-8.
  • Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65.
  • Rousseeuw, P. J., & Van Driessen, K. (1999). Computing robust clusters. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 69(1-2), 135-153.