Compare Two Versions Of The Same Article By An Author 504450

Compare Two Versions Of The Same Article By An Author Please Respon

Compare Two Versions of the Same Article By An Author Please Respond

"Compare Two Versions of the Same Article by an Author" Please respond to the following: Read the two (2) versions of the article titled: “The Objectification of Women. Whose Fault Is it?” by Santi DeRosa in Chapter 8. Identify the thesis statement of each version. Summarize the second or final version. Note any changes between the first and the second version. Indicate if the thesis statement changed. Discuss your agreement or disagreement with DeRosa’s views. Identify three (3) changes the writer made between the first and second version. Speculate on reasons the writer made the changes. 200 words

Paper For Above instruction

The two versions of Santi DeRosa’s article “The Objectification of Women. Whose Fault Is it?” serve to illustrate how the author’s perspective and emphasis evolve through revisions. The first version presents a thesis centered on societal and media influences contributing to the objectification of women, arguing that external forces play a significant role. In contrast, the final version’s thesis shifts slightly to emphasize personal responsibility alongside societal factors, suggesting that both individual choices and cultural influences perpetuate this issue.

In summary, the second version offers a more balanced approach, acknowledging the interplay between personal agency and societal norms. It underscores the importance of individual awareness and responsibility while still addressing the influential role of media and culture. Notably, the thesis statement changed from a predominantly external blame focus to a more nuanced view of shared responsibility.

Regarding agreement, I believe DeRosa provides a fair assessment of the complex causes behind women’s objectification. While societal influences are undeniable, I agree that empowering women to recognize and resist objectification is crucial. The author made three key changes: first, broadening the scope to include personal responsibility; second, refining language to sound more balanced; and third, emphasizing the need for societal change along with individual action. These revisions likely aimed to strengthen the argument by appealing to a wider audience and fostering a sense of shared responsibility.

References

• DeRosa, S. (Chapter 8). The Objectification of Women. Whose Fault Is it?
• Additional scholarly sources discussing media influence and personal responsibility in gender objectification (insert appropriate citations accordingly).