Comparison-Contrast Essay Jimmy Carrasco ENG/220 June 28, 20

Comparison-contrast essay Jimmy Carrasco ENG/220 JUNE 28, 2017 Prof. Katherine Kleier

The assignment requires a comparison-contrast essay analyzing multiple topics, including interpersonal communication, cultural differences between Japan and the Philippines, and the advantages and disadvantages of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) versus organic foods. The essay should explore similarities and differences among these topics, integrating examples and scholarly references to support the analysis. It should be structured with a clear introduction, body paragraphs for each comparison and contrast point, and a conclusion summarizing the findings.

Specifically, the essay must compare and contrast how interpersonal communication barriers can hinder understanding, examine cultural greeting customs and gestures used in Japan and the Philippines, and analyze the benefits and risks associated with GMOs compared to organic foods, highlighting their impacts on food security, taste, and health risks. The discussion should include practical examples, cultural insights, and scientific considerations, supported by credible academic sources.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective communication, cultural norms, and agricultural innovations are pivotal aspects that shape human interactions, societal development, and food security. This essay critically compares and contrasts these themes, drawing insights from scholarly research to highlight their similarities, differences, and implications for contemporary society.

Introduction

Human society is defined by complex interactions fostered through communication, cultural practices, and technological advances. Understanding and appreciating these elements is essential in navigating personal relationships, intercultural exchanges, and food sustainability. This essay explores the multifaceted nature of interpersonal communication barriers, cultural greeting customs in Japan and the Philippines, and the contrasting advantages and disadvantages of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) versus organic foods. By analyzing these topics, the essay underscores their significance in promoting effective interaction, cultural understanding, and sustainable agriculture, which are fundamental to societal progress.

Comparison of Communication Barriers and Cultural Greetings

Interpersonal communication forms the bedrock of human interaction and understanding. However, various barriers such as physical disabilities, language differences, and lack of interest can impede effective communication. Beebe et al. (2009) highlight that hearing impairments or speech difficulties, such as stammering, hinder message transmission, requiring alternative methods like sign language or visual cues. Language barriers further complicate understanding when individuals do not share a common linguistic repertoire, reducing interpersonal efficacy (Beebe et al., 2009). Additionally, disinterest or irrelevance diminishes message reception, making communication ineffective.

Contrastingly, cultural greetings exemplify the diversity and commonality in respectful interactions across societies. The Japanese traditionally bow as a sign of respect, especially toward elders, and call each other by last names with honorifics, emphasizing humility and formality (Espiritu, 2005). In contrast, Filipinos greet with smiles, hugs, or handshakes, reflecting warmth and familial closeness. They also address others with titles like Mrs., Mr., or Ms., followed by surnames until familiarity is established (Espiritu, 2005). Despite differences, both cultures value gestures—bowing and smiling—that convey respect and appreciation, highlighting the universal importance of respectful communication beyond linguistic barriers.

Analysis of GMOs Versus Organic Foods

The debate over genetically modified organisms versus organic foods underscores contrasting priorities in agriculture: productivity and sustainability versus natural purity and health. GMO crops, as discussed in the week three research, offer advantages such as pest resistance, tolerance to harsh climatic conditions, and reduced need for chemical pesticides (Kuntz & Davis, 2018). These traits lead to increased yields, lower production costs, and enhanced food security, especially in regions facing climate challenges (Gruère & Sengupta, 2013). The ability of GMO crops to withstand drought or heavy rainfall contributes significantly to global food stability.

On the other hand, organic foods are prized for their natural flavors and absence of synthetic pesticides and genetically engineered genes. They are believed to pose fewer health risks, such as severe illnesses or fatalities associated with pesticide residues (Smith et al., 2015). Nonetheless, concerns about GMO foods include potential gene transfer to pests or weeds, creating pesticide-resistant superweeds, and reduced natural taste due to genetic engineering processes (Pew Charitable Trusts, 2017). While GMOs promote agricultural efficiency, critics emphasize precaution due to environmental and health uncertainties.

Contrast of Disadvantages and Barriers

Despite their benefits, GMOs face criticism for possible unintended consequences, including gene transfer that might exacerbate ecological issues, and the loss of natural flavors and nutrients. Organic foods avoid these problems but present limitations such as lower yields and higher costs, which can hinder widespread adoption and accessibility (Willer et al., 2018). Similarly, communication barriers can lead to misunderstandings and inefficiencies in social interactions, emphasizing the importance of cultural sensitivity and adaptability.

For example, physical barriers like hearing impairments or speech difficulties prevent effective interpersonal exchanges, necessitating alternative communication methods (Beebe et al., 2009). Language differences also restrict mutual understanding in multicultural settings, requiring language education or translation services. Such barriers can impede progress in diverse societies, just as environmental or health concerns serve as barriers to GMO acceptance despite their potential benefits (Willer et al., 2018). Recognizing and addressing these barriers is crucial for fostering harmony and innovation across societal sectors.

Conclusion

In sum, effective communication, cultural understanding, and sustainable agriculture are interconnected facets that influence societal well-being. While communication barriers challenge human interaction, recognizing universal gestures of respect—such as bowing or smiling—can bridge cultural divides. Similarly, the push for GMO crops exemplifies technological progress aimed at securing food supplies, yet it necessitates careful assessment of health and environmental risks. Balancing benefits and drawbacks in these domains is essential for fostering a more inclusive and sustainable future. Through acknowledgment, adaptation, and innovation, societies can overcome barriers and harness advancements for collective growth.

References

• Beebe, S. A., Beebe, S. J., & Redmond, M. V. (2009). Interpersonal communication. Pearson Custom Publishers.
• Espiritu, A. (2005). Five faces of exile: the Nation and Filipino American Intellectuals. Stanford University Press.
• Gruère, G., & Sengupta, R. (2013). International acceptance of genetically modified foods: A survey. Food Policy, 40, 119-130.
• Kuntz, A., & Davis, G. (2018). The benefits and risks of GMO crops: A review. AgroFood Industry Hi-Tech, 29(5), 10-15.
• Pew Charitable Trusts. (2017). Genetically engineered crops and environmental risks. Pew Trusts Report.
• Smith, L., et al. (2015). Health and nutritional benefits of organic versus conventional foods. Public Health Nutrition, 18(8), 1437–1447.
• Willer, H., et al. (2018). The world of organic agriculture: Statistics and emerging trends 2018. IFOAM - Organics International.
• Narangoa, R. (2010). Imperial Japan and National Identities in Asia. Routledge.